Skip to content
St Luke's Health Care Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

St Luke's Health Care Foundation

To support st.

$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$15MHuman Services$1.7MEducation$25kCommunity Improvement$12kPhilanthropy$7k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $229k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.3M
$228,696
Median grant
1
States reached
$69M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LUKE'S METHODIST HOSPITAL$2,693,627
HELEN G NASSIF COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER$302,269
ABBE AGING SERVICES (1044)$257,251
UNITYPOINT AT HOME$228,696
UNITYPOINT CLINICS$21,548
ABBE CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH (1041)$13,654
ABBE MANAGEMENT CORP (1045)$12,207
ABBE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH INC (1040)$6,947
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HELEN G NASSIF COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER: $404k → 9%JONES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $22k → 11%HELEN G NASSIF COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER: $302k → 9%JONES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%HELEN G NASSIF COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER: $296k → 9%HELEN G NASSIF COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER: $260k → 9%HELEN G NASSIF COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER: $255k → 9%HELEN G NASSIF COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER: $190k → 9%AGING SERVICES INC: $426k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 8 repeat orgs$723k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$16M
$433k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+38%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $290k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LUKE'S METHODIST HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $13M · revenue +27%
  • UA
    UNITYPOINT AT HOME
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +63%
  • IP
    IOWA PHYSICIANS CLINIC MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $285k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • AS
    AGING SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $426k · revenue +38%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Iowa Hospital Corporation

Improving the health of the community through healing, caring and teaching.

Health
2
Central Iowa Health System

Improving the health of the community through healing, caring and teaching.

Health
3
Iowa Health System

To improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
4
Unitypoint Health At Work

Unitypoint health at work provides onsite health and wellness services designed for improved patient experience, reduced healthcare cost and improved population health.

Health
5
Abbehealth Inc

A not for profit, integrated health services company providing community education, awareness, advocacy and outreach while managing the coordination of services for older adults and psychologically and/or physically challenged individuals.

Health
6
Northwest Iowa Hospital Corporation

The mission of northwest iowa hospital corporation, d/b/a st. luke's regional medical center, is to improve the health of the people and the communities we serve.

Health
7
Unity Healthcare

The mission of trinity-muscatine is to improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
8
Iowa Health Foundation

Improving the health of our communities through philanthropy, service and volunteerism.

Health
9
Unity Healthcare Foundation

To provide financial assistance to unity healthcare to help enable it to carry out its exempt function of providing health care to the community.

Philanthropy
10
St Luke'sjones Regional Medical Center

To provide quality services in an efficient, cost-effective manner and to promote healthy lifestyles to our customers.

Education
11
Grinnell Regional Medical Center

Grinnell regional medical center's mission is dedication to health care for life through genuine care and compassion for the health and well-being of patients, families and the communities grinnell regional medical center is privileged to…

Health
12
Trinity Medical Center

The mission of trinity medical center is to improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iowa Physicians Clinic Medical Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Coe College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LUKE'S METHODIST HOSPITAL: $13,032,068 · HealthST LUKE'S METHODIST HOSPITAL+3 more: $337,645 · HealthCEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,707,590 · Human ServicesCEDAR RAPIDS C…AGING SERVICES INC: $425,517 · Human ServicesAGING SERVICES…+1 more: $37,273 · Human ServicesUNITYPOINT AT HOME: $1,052,634 · OtherUNITYPOIN…ABBE AGING SERVICES (1044): $257,251 · OtherABBE AGIN…+2 more: $36,971 · OtherCOE COLLEGE: $25,057 · EducationUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA: $7,474 · Philanthropy
Health$13,369,713Human Services$2,170,380Other$1,346,856Education$25,057Philanthropy$7,474

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST LUKE'S METHODIST HOSPITAL: $13,032,068 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,707,590 over 8y, 84% of budgetUNITYPOINT AT HOME: $1,052,634 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAGING SERVICES INC: $425,517 over 1y, 16% of budgetIOWA PHYSICIANS CLINIC MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $285,126 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJONES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $37,273 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS: $31,918 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCOE COLLEGE: $25,057 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA: $24,764 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetABBE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $20,601 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA: $7,474 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Cedar Rapids …Alliant Energy Founda…United Way of East Ce…GreenState Credit Uni…Community Foundation …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Cedar Rapids Community FoundationIA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · United Way of East Central Iowa · GreenState Credit Union · Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Luke's Health Care Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Luke's Health Care Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Luke's Health Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home