Skip to content

· Public charity

St Louis Blues Alumni Assn

To support amateur hockey.

$770k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.7MHealth$428kPublic Safety & Disaster$57kYouth Development$25kEducation$14kPhilanthropy$8k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $501,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $769,989 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $268,489 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $94k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$94,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$214k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The V Foundation$400,000
St Louis AAA Blues$94,000
St Louis Prospects Hockey Club$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NHL Alumni Association: $25k → 16%The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Inc: $10k → 9%TPH Impact Player Foundation: $8k → 13%St Louis Blues Warriors Hockey: $10k → 5%Youth Bridge Community Foundation: $85k → 11%Thompson Foundation for Autism: $5k → 17%The V Foundation: $400k → 8%St Louis Prospects Hockey Club: $8k → 6%St Louis Blues Warriors Hockey: $7k → 5%Maryville University: $14k → 11%St Louis Prospects Hockey Club: $8k → 6%St Louis Blues Warriors Inc: $6k → 5%St Louis Prospects Hockey Club: $10k → 11%Lindenwood University: $14k → 5%St Louis Prospects Hockey Club: $8k → 11%Disabled Athlete Sports Association: $24k → 5%St Louis Police Foundation: $43k → 11%Responder Rescue Inc: $7k → 5%St Louis Police Foundation: $8k → 11%Legacy Ice Foundation: $800k → 11%Legacy Ice Foundation: $20k → 11%SSM Cardinal Glennon Childrens Hospital: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of St Louis Blues Alumni Assn’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

St Louis Blues Alumni Assnlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 6 repeat orgs$519k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$1.7M
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+28%

Still filing today

100%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHealthPublic Safety & DisasterEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LOUIS LEGACY ICE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2020 · $820k · revenue +3% · 29% of their budget
  • SL
    St Louis Blues Warriors Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $488k · revenue +235% · 49% of their budget
  • CH
    CHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2018–2021 · $187k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • NA
    NHL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -111%
  • DA
    DISABLED ATHLETE SPORTS ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $24k · revenue +28%
  • LE
    LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Youth Hockey Foundation
Recreation & Sports
2
Missouri Amateur Ice Hockey

Hockey, at all levels of play. this includes education in the playing skills of ice hockey for the benefits of health and welfare of individual players and the community, including such advanced programs that possibly may assist individual…

Recreation & Sports
3
American Collegiate Hockey Association

The american collegiate hockey association is the national governing body for the sport of ice hockey at the collegiate level throughout the united states. the overall objective is to maintain the highest possible standards for the sport…

Recreation & Sports
4
Hat Trick Hockey Corp

To promote the personal character and athletic development of players by providing on-ice and off-ice training and opportunities that allow each player to maximize their potential as a person and as a hockey player. the sioux falls power…

Recreation & Sports
5
Music City Marauders Hockey Assoc
Recreation & Sports
6
St Louis Blues Alumni Assn

To support amateur hockey.

Education
7
St Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

To enhance the student-athletes' educational process through intercollegiate competitive activity encompassing the rules of fairness based on the highest standards of integrity and sportsmanlike conduct.

Recreation & Sports
8
The Greater St Louis Amateur Hockey Hall of Fame

To recognize and honor individuals that have demonstrated excellence in St. Louis Amateur Hockey

Arts & Culture
9
St Louis Youth Hockey Association

To be the leader in the growth and advocacy for girls hockey in the St. Louis region by providing a safe, player focused and fun environment for female athletes. Offering programs for female athletes aged 4-19.

Recreation & Sports
10
The Hyland Hills Junior Hockey Association

Become ambassadors of youth hockey while developing players to reach their maximum potential. have respect and love for the game while acting with integrity, fairness, and honesty.

—
11
Kansas City Youth Hockey Associatio

The kcyha provides a fun developmental and competitive athletic experience to its players and their families.

Recreation & Sports
12
St Paul Capitals Hockey Association

The st. paul capitals hockey association, a community built around a common respect for the game of hockey, strives to consistently develop players and coaches to their full potential in a fun and safe hockey environment. spcha members…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Legacy Ice Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LOUIS LEGACY ICE FOUNDATION: $820,000 · Recreation & SportsST LOUIS LEGACY ICE FOUNDATIONSt Louis Blues Warriors Inc: $488,039 · Recreation & SportsSt Louis Blues Warriors IncCHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $187,145 · Recreation & SportsCHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION+2 more: $56,745 · Recreation & SportsTHE V FOUNDATION: $400,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION+3 more: $27,630 · Health+3 moreAMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI: $98,563 · OtherSt Louis Police Foundation: $50,974 · Public Safety & DisasterRESPONDER RESCUE INC: $6,500 · Public Safety & DisasterLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $14,000 · EducationMaryville University - St Louis: $13,979 · EducationNHL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTph Impact Player Foundation: $7,500 · Philanthropy
Recreation & Sports$1,551,929Health$427,630Other$98,563Public Safety & Disaster$57,474Education$27,979Youth Development$25,000Philanthropy$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST LOUIS LEGACY ICE FOUNDATION: $820,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetSt Louis Blues Warriors Inc: $488,039 over 5y, 49% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $187,145 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetAMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI: $98,563 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetSt Louis Police Foundation: $50,974 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetST LOUIS PROSPECTS HOCKEY CLUB: $32,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetDISABLED ATHLETE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $24,245 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaryville University - St Louis: $13,979 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESPONDER RESCUE INC: $6,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHOMPSON FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM & NEURODEVELOPMENT: $5,130 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

World Wide Technology FoundationMO19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: World Wide Technology Foundation · Blues for Kids · Wsdc Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Louis Blues Alumni Assn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Louis Blues Alumni Assn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to St Louis Blues Alumni Assn?

    Find your warmest path to St Louis Blues Alumni Assn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Louis Blues Alumni Assn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph