Skip to content

· Public charity

St Joseph's Area Health Services

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$103kPublic Benefit$23kHuman Services$21kCommunity Improvement$17kYouth Development$10kHousing & Shelter$10kEducation$7k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $35,616, the rows itemized in this filing. The $72,462 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $36,846 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$130M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC$15,116
LIVING AT HOME OF THE PARK RAPIDS AREA$10,500
YOUTH EMERGENCY SHELTER & SUPPORTS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $10k → 14%LIVING AT HOME OF THE PARK RAPIDS AREA: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$131k · 3 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$131k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-19%
+4%

Still filing today

33%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $103k · revenue -19%
  • CO
    CITY OF PARK RAPIDS
    3× · 2017–2023 · $17k
  • HC
    HUBBARD COUNTY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $11k

Funded once

  • KO
    KINSHIP OF THE PARK RAPIDS AREA
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -29%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • PR
    Park Rapids Area High School #309
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elk Rapids Community Cupboard

Provide food for needy local families

Food & Nutrition
2
Prairie Ridge Food Pantry

tohelpfightfoodinsecurity.wereviveandgivedonatedfooditemstothoselessfortunate.

Food & Nutrition
3
Park Ridge Chamber of Commerce

The park ridge chamber of commerce is a non-profit non-partisan organization whose mission is to provide support and leadership to the business and professional community within the city of park ridge.the chamber will work toward…

—
4
Friends of the Cedar Rapids Public Library

Friends supports the cedar rapids public library services and programs, promotes literacy through outreach programs that encourage and enhancereading throughout the community and conducts fundraising activities to assist with library and…

Education
5
Long Prairie Emergency Food Pantry

Furnish needy famililes food

—
6
Rock Rapids Development Corporation Inc

To retain and develop industrial, commercial and retail businesses in rock rapids, iowa. to promote our community as a great place to live, work, play and conduct business

Membership Benefit
7
Rapid City Police Officers Activity League
—
8
Minnewaska Rotary Club

Donate to worthy causes in the world. promote peace and understanding in our local business community

—
9
Grand Rapids Kiwanis Foundation
—
10
Rotary Club of Davenport

Service club. supporting non profits in davenport, iowa and the surrounding communities.

—
11
Alex Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce

Promote commerce & industry in alexandria, mn.

Community Improvement
12
Lake Mills Area Chamber of Commerce

Community & economic development of Lake Mills area

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living At Home of the Park Rapids a; the most unlike its peers is Youth Emergency Shelter and Supports. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $103,233 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INCCITY OF PARK RAPIDS: $17,050 · OtherCITY OF PARK RAPIDSHUBBARD COUNTY: $11,000 · OtherHUBBARD COUNTYPark Rapids Area High School #309: $7,150 · OtherPARK RAPIDS LAKES AREA CHAMBER: $6,250 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL PARK RAPIDS ROTARY CLUB: $6,150 · OtherLIVING AT HOME OF THE PARK RAPIDS A: $10,500 · Human ServicesLIVING AT HO…LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $10,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOC…KINSHIP OF THE PARK RAPIDS AREA: $10,073 · Crime & LegalYouth Emergency Shelter and Supports: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$150,833Human Services$20,500Crime & Legal$10,073Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $103,233 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLIVING AT HOME OF THE PARK RAPIDS A: $10,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKINSHIP OF THE PARK RAPIDS AREA: $10,073 over 1y, 11% of budgetYouth Emergency Shelter and Supports: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL PARK RAPIDS ROTARY CLUB: $6,150 over 1y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Minnesota FoundationMN19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Minnesota Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Joseph's Area Health Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Joseph's Area Health Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Joseph's Area Health Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph