Skip to content
St Francis Hospital Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

St Francis Hospital Inc

The Mission of St.

$682k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$171MHousing & Shelter$305kHuman Services$213kArts & Culture$142kEducation$133kCommunity Improvement$104kPhilanthropy$93kReligion$88kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $443,943, the rows itemized in this filing. The $682,423 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $238,480 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $315k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$13,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$587M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Habitat for Humanity of Greenville County$80,000
Greenville Free Medical Clinic$45,833
Cancer Society of Greenville$40,000
South Carolina Childrens Theatre$34,837
Meyer Center for Special Children$33,573
YMCA of Greenville$33,500
American Heart Association$20,417
Dabos All In Team Foundation$18,333
St Anthony of Padua$15,000
St Mary's Catholic School$15,000
County of Greenville$13,500
United Ministries$12,500
Mill Community Ministries$12,500
Alianza Hispana-Hispanic Alliance$10,000
Jasmine Road Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Camp Kesem National: $8k → 14%Upstate Circle of Friends: $10k → 10%Mill Community Ministries: $10k → 10%Mill Community Ministries: $10k → 10%YMCA of Greenville: $35k → 10%YMCA of Greenville: $13k → 10%Urban League Of The Upstate: $13k → 10%Phillis Wheatley Association: $10k → 10%Urban League of the Upstate: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of St Francis Hospital Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in SC; by stated purpose, 81%.

St Francis Hospital Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$172M · 21 repeat orgs$306k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
19

Total granted

$172M
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+22%

Still filing today

95%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterReligionArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $230k · revenue +3%
  • MC
    MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $115k · revenue +31%
  • GF
    GREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $110k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • GG
    GREATER GREENVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    one grant, 2022 · $43k · revenue -1%
  • CB
    CHARITY BALL BOARD OF GREENVILLE
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +4%
  • CG
    COLUMBUS GROVE SAINT ANTHONY OF PADUA PARISH
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alliance for a Healthier South Carolina

Convene and connect diverse stakeholders to align and catalyze efforts to improve health and well-being for communities across South Carolina.

—
2
Greater Greenville Association of Realtors Inc

Providing standards, guidelines, and procedures to those members engaged in practice of the real estate profession

—
3
United Way of Greenville County Inc

We mobilize people and resources to improve lives, strengthen the community and advance equity for the benefit of all.

—
4
Bon Secours Medical Group Greenville Specialty Care Llc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good help to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.…

Health
5
Greenville Area Development Corporation

Promoting and enhancing the economic growth and development of greenville county south carolina; gadc was formed by greenville county council.

Community Improvement
6
Foundation for a Greater Greenwood County Inc

Providing leadership to enhance the quality of life in greenwood through strategic long-term vision and collaborative community development initiatives.

Philanthropy
7
Granville Health Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to engage in charitable efforts and to support granville health system in providing healthcare and related services to the citizens and residents of granville county and the surrounding community.

Health
8
United Housing Connections

We connect people at-risk for or experiencing homlessness with safe, sustainable, and affordable homes. we work to promote and preserve the dignity and quality of life for all citizens in upstate south carolina.

Community Improvement
9
Meals on Wheels of Greenville Endowment Fund Inc

To set aside funds for the future growth and support of meals on wheels of greenville, inc (an affiliated organization).

Philanthropy
10
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
11
Greater Greenville Housing & Revitalizat

Develop, provide, and promote safe, affordable, and decent housing and design, research, and/or promote revitalization activities and facilitate the coordination of various service and support activities for the greater Greenville…

Community Improvement
12
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity of Greenville County Sc Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
27/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Francis Physician Services Inc: $168,489,391 · HealthSt Francis Physician Services Inc+5 more: $138,417 · HealthBon Secours - St Francis Health System Foundation Inc: $2,500,734 · OtherMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $114,671 · OtherGREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $110,250 · Other+17 more: $435,397 · OtherYMCA OF GREENVILLE: $80,554 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY: $55,000 · Human ServicesMILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES: $32,500 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF THE UPSTATE: $30,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesUPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $10,400 · Human ServicesPHILLIS WHEATLEY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Human Services+4 more: $28,700 · Human ServicesHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC: $230,000 · Housing & ShelterFIRST IMPRESSION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $134,837 · Arts & CultureGREENVILLE ARTS FESTIVAL: $7,500 · Arts & CultureGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC: $107,500 · EducationCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationREBUILD UPSTATE: $60,000 · ReligionUNITED MINISTRIES: $42,500 · ReligionBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $7,500 · Religion
Health$168,627,808Other$3,161,052Human Services$272,154Housing & Shelter$247,500Arts & Culture$142,337Education$117,500Religion$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSt Francis Physician Services Inc: $168,489,391 over 3y, 30% of budgetBon Secours - St Francis Health System Foundation Inc: $2,500,734 over 3y, 62% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC: $230,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $134,837 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $114,671 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $110,250 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC: $107,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $105,417 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF GREENVILLE: $80,554 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CANCER CONNECTION: $60,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetREBUILD UPSTATE: $60,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetDABO'S ALL IN TEAM FOUNDATION: $58,333 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY: $55,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetJASMINE ROAD INC: $51,314 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetUNITED MINISTRIES: $42,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER GREENVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $42,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $34,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES: $32,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF THE UPSTATE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLIVEWELL GREENVILLE: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetPROJECT HOST INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $10,400 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIS WHEATLEY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetGreenville Area Parkinsons Society: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetFIRST IMPRESSION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $7,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENVILLE ARTS FESTIVAL: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSERVANTS FOR SIGHT: $7,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES OF HOPE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION: $6,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scsymmes FoundationThe Jolley FoundationDaniel-Mickel Foundat…Dabo's All in Team Fo…United Way of Greenvi…Scansource Charitable…Charles Timmons Found…Hollingsworth Funds I…Sisters of Charity Fo…United Community Bank…Sisk Foundation Bunco…Charity Ball Board of…
Scsymmes FoundationMO53.7× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scsymmes Foundation · The Jolley Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Charles Timmons Foundation · Hollingsworth Funds Inc · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · United Community Bank Foundation · Sisk Foundation Buncombe St Methodist Church · Charity Ball Board of Greenville

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Francis Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Francis Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Francis Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home