Skip to content

· Public charity

St Cloud Youth Hockey Association Inc

St cloud youth hockey association will strive toward providing all members with a positive growing environment, which enhances a competitive spirit defining sportsmanship and respect for others through the sport of hockey.

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$246kYouth Development$58kHuman Services$13kHealth$10kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $133,658, the rows itemized in this filing. The $154,304 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,646 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $73k
$10,450
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SARTELL YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$72,928
ST CLOUD GIRLS HOCKEY$12,470
ST CLOUD TECH HOCKEY BOOSTERS$10,470
CATHEDRAL HOCKEY$10,450
SCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL$9,405
JUST FOR KIXBOWL GAME$7,215
TANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION$5,560
APOLLO FOOTBALL$5,160
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION: $7k → 9%TANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$265k · 3 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$265k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+641%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SY
    SARTELL YOUTH HOCKEY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $194k · revenue +11%
  • SB
    SCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL
    5× · 2020–2025 · $58k
  • TT
    TANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue -9%

Funded once

  • SI
    SMILE IN MY HEART FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • NC
    NORTH CREST ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +641%
  • CM
    CENTRAL MINNESOTA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SARTELL YOUTH HOCKEY: $194,243 · Recreation & SportsSARTELL YOUTH HOCKEY+1 more: $6,595 · Recreation & SportsSCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL: $57,690 · OtherSCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALLST CLOUD GIRLS HOCKEY: $12,470 · OtherST CLOUD GIRLS HOCKEYCATHEDRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $10,450 · OtherCATHEDRAL HIGH SCHOOLSMILE IN MY HEART FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherSMILE IN MY HEART FOUNDATIONJUST FOR KIXBOWL GAME: $7,215 · OtherJUST FOR KIXBOWL GAMEST CLOUD TECH BOYS HOCKEY BOOSTERS: $10,470 · EducationCENTRAL MINNESOTA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION: $5,015 · EducationTANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION: $12,755 · Human ServicesDISTRICT 742 LOCAL EDUCATION ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION: $5,160 · Community Improvement
Recreation & Sports$200,838Other$97,825Education$15,485Human Services$12,755Community Improvement$5,160

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSARTELL YOUTH HOCKEY: $194,243 over 3y, 10% of budgetTANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION: $12,755 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetST CLOUD TECH BOYS HOCKEY BOOSTERS: $10,470 over 1y, 12% of budgetDISTRICT 742 LOCAL EDUCATION ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION: $5,160 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Cloud Youth Hockey Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Cloud Youth Hockey Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Cloud Youth Hockey Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph