Skip to content
St Baldrick's Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

St Baldrick's Foundation Inc

The st.

$15M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
27
States reached
$3.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$158M
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $3.4M
  • $250k+16 grants · $12M
$85,573
Median grant
27
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION$3,310,713
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE$1,292,044
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$1,072,500
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$1,068,135
RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$955,896
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$660,000
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE$526,822
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$525,000
MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$450,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$407,500
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER$335,000
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$334,991
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$334,934
TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY$330,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$330,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THERE WITH CARE: $16k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $8k → 12%There With Care: $5k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$142M · 112 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

112 repeat relationships: 50 still active in FY2025, 62 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

112
41

Total granted

$142M
$3.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+36%

Still filing today

56%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38M · revenue +12% · 65% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +88%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.0M · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • PH
    Prisma Health-Midlandsgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $330k · revenue +30%
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY
    one grant, 2018 · $324k
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2022 · $220k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
6
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
7
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
10
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
11
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
12
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/100
Grantees still filing
85/100
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $37,835,460 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,880,450 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIADana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $6,969,242 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc+53 more: $15,496,525 · Health+53 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5,952,906 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $5,420,086 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCI…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $3,623,507 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELESNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC: $2,772,943 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $2,612,914 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO: $2,231,485 · OtherCINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2,125,784 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $1,687,054 · Other+63 more: $23,530,368 · Other+63 moreBaylor College of Medicine: $6,540,784 · EducationBaylor College of Med…University of Chicago: $4,002,952 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoEmory University: $3,833,643 · EducationEmory UniversityJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,126,584 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERS…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,380,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE …New York University: $1,451,977 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,225,220 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,027,308 · Education+23 more: $6,799,464 · Education+23 moreENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $8,000,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $681,824 · PhilanthropyNorthwestern University: $300,000 · Recreation & SportsAdventist Health International: $298,630 · InternationalTHERE WITH CARE: $30,594 · Human Services
Health$68,181,677Other$49,957,047Education$30,387,932Philanthropy$8,681,824Recreation & Sports$300,000International$298,630Human Services$30,594

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $37,835,460 over 9y, 65% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $8,000,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,880,450 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $6,969,242 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $6,540,784 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $4,002,952 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $3,833,643 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,126,584 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,380,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKEATON'S CHILD CANCER ALLIANCE: $1,583,687 over 9y, 35% of budgetNew York University: $1,451,977 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE: $1,450,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM: $1,400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1,287,448 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,225,220 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,181,653 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,027,308 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $845,207 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $700,832 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $681,824 over 9y, 7.8% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $678,260 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $674,477 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $615,534 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $610,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University: $609,707 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $545,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $478,366 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $449,060 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $421,110 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSt Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s: $403,980 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $400,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $396,350 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $391,464 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYale University: $367,083 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $357,131 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $349,113 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $333,014 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPrisma Health-Midlands: $330,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $330,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $327,896 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $320,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $313,892 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $308,360 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOrlando Health Inc: $300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAdventist Health International: $298,630 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLAND: $291,422 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $275,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KEATON'S CHILD CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cystic Fibrosis Found…The Children's Hospit…The Children's Oncolo…Public Health Institu…American Heart Associ…American Cancer Socie…Hyundai Hope on WheelsAmerican Thrombosis a…Gamers Outreach Found…Muscular Dystrophy As…Alexs Lemonade Stand …Mayo Clinic
Cystic Fibrosis FoundationMD56.9× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · The Children's Oncology Group Foundation Inc · Public Health Institute · American Heart Association Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Hyundai Hope on Wheels · American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc · Gamers Outreach Foundation Inc · Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc · Alexs Lemonade Stand Foundation · Mayo Clinic

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Baldrick's Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Baldrick's Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: 44% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center: 5% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Orlando Health Inc: 0% of income from government
  • St Joseph's Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on St Baldrick's’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home