Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

St Anthony Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$2.4MHealth$1.2MRecreation & Sports$305kReligion$279kHousing & Shelter$223kPhilanthropy$35kEducation$26kFood & Nutrition$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $1,129,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,685,250 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,556,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sjogren's Foundation$1,000,000
St. Joseph Catholic Church$50,000
First United Methodist Church$50,000
Jr. Achievement of Lincoln$10,000
Friends of the Children$5,000
I've Got a Name$5,000
The White Cane Foundation$5,000
Community Action (Gathering Place)$1,000
Bryan Foundation$1,000
Wyuka Historical Foundation$1,000
Lincoln Rotary Club$1,000
Sheridan Lutheran Church$250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 12 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
30

Total granted

$3.5M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MALONE COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2.0M · revenue +317% · 29% of their budget
  • SF
    SJOGREN'S FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +79% · 29% of their budget
  • BF
    Bryan Foundation
    2× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • MT
    MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACHgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +60%
  • LS
    LINCOLN SPORTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -4% · 34% of their budget
  • SA
    Salvation Army
    one grant, 2022 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Health Foundation
Health
2
Food Bank of Lincoln Foundation

The foundation is dedicated to the development and implementation of the food bank, an organization exempt under code section 501(c)(3).

Food & Nutrition
3
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
4
Lincoln County Medical Center Foundation Inc
Health
5
Lutheran Family Services of Ne Inc

Lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.'s (lfs) mission is to express god's love for all people by providing quality human care services that build and strengthen individual, family and community life. our vision is saftey, hope and…

Human Services
6
Lincoln Medical Education Partnership

To provide family practice training and, in support of that end, relevant healthcare education and services.

7
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
8
Lincoln Chamber of Commerce

Community development in lincoln, ne

9
Jefferson Community Health Center Inc

Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.

Health
10
Lindsborg Community Health Care Foundation Inc

The purpose of the Lindsborg Community Health Care Foundation is to coordinate and collaborate: Community health care entities, Health related philanthropic activities, Assessment of need for and the recruitment of professional medical…

11
Downtown Lincoln Foundation

The foundation supports the city of lincoln and downtown lincoln, nebraska by providing opportunities for obtaining gifts, grants or other funds to be used for special projects benefitting downtown lincoln, nebraska.

Community Improvement
12
Friendship Home of Lincoln Inc

To provide emergency shelter

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lincoln Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ive Got a Name. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChildhood Cancer SupportDomestic Violence and Sexua…College Foundation SupportChristian Outreach Ministri…Asian American Civic & Cult…Food Pantries and AssistanceAddiction & Mental Health T…Community Hospital SystemsFaith-Based Homeless Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number15%0%<5yr10%7%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr17%33%35–55yr24%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value15%0%<5yr10%3%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr15%29%20–35yr17%55%35–55yr24%11%55yr+

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
8%
1,067/14,083

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MALONE COMMUNITY CENTER — $2,005,000 · OtherMALONE COMMUNITY CENTERSt. Joseph Catholic Church — $135,000 · OtherSt. Joseph Catholic Church+28 more — $375,500 · Other+28 moreSJOGREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,005,000 · HealthSJOGREN'S FOUNDATION INCTEAM JACK FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Health+4 more — $76,000 · Health+4 moreMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH — $300,000 · Human Services+2 more — $5,500 · Human ServicesLINCOLN SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 · Recreation & SportsPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION — $172,500 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyFITTING FUTURES — $25,000 · PhilanthropyLincoln Community Foundation Inc — $5,000 · PhilanthropyASHLAND AREA FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyASIAN COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER — $20,000 · Arts & CultureWYUKA HISTORICAL FOUNDATION — $5,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,515,500Health$1,131,000Human Services$305,500Recreation & Sports$300,000Housing & Shelter$222,500Philanthropy$85,000Arts & Culture$25,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMALONE COMMUNITY CENTER — $2,005,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetSJOGREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,005,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH — $300,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetLINCOLN SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION — $172,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTEAM JACK FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY — $35,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetBryan Foundation — $26,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFITTING FUTURES — $25,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetASIAN COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHOPESPOKE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWYUKA HISTORICAL FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION FOR FAMILIES — $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIVE GOT A NAME — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFriends of the Children — $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetLincoln Community Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND AREA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGOTHENBURG SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE41.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Abel Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · Acklie Charitable Foundation · Cooper Foundation · United Way of Lincoln and Lancaster County · Olsson Family Foundation · Duncan Family Trust · Theresa Farnsworth Wittmann Charitable Foundation · The Hampton Family Foundation · James Stuart III Family Foundation · Kinder Porter Scott Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to St Anthony Foundation?

Find your warmest path to St Anthony Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $3.6M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph