· Private foundation
Sss Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $96k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+3 grants · $950k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SRI SATHYA SAI CENTRAL TRUST | $350,000 |
| SRI SATHYA SAI CENTRAL TRUST | $300,300 |
| SRI SATHYA SAI CENTRAL TRUST | $300,000 |
| SRI SATHYA SAI TRUST KARNATAKA | $50,050 |
| JSS MEDICAL COLLEGE | $41,025 |
| SRI SATHYA SAI TRUST KARNATAKA | $25,030 |
| SRI SATHYA SAI TRUST KARNATAKA | $20,050 |
| ISHWARAMBA TRUST | $10,050 |
| MYSORE MEDICAL COLLEGE GRAD ASSN | $5,500 |
| SRI SATHYA SAI TRUST KARNATAKA | $5,050 |
| ISHWARAMBA TRUST | $5,050 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SRI SATHYA SAI GLOBAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL CARES | $3,700 |
| HOMELESS EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $309k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against -51% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSSRI SATHYA SAI CENTRAL TRUST4× · 2021–2024 · $3.6M
- SSSRI SAYTHA SAI CENTRAL TRUST2× · 2019–2020 · $1.3M
- SSSRI SATHYA SAI TRUST KARNATAKA4× · 2021–2024 · $360k
Funded once
- JAJSS ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATIONone grant, 2023 · $42k
- SSSRI SAYTHA SAI TRUSTone grant, 2019 · $20k
- SSSRI SATHYA SAI TRUSTone grant, 2023 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Assist low income individuals by offering second hand items at a low cost as well as providing shelter assistance to those in need.
Provide individual assistance, free clinic, and other outreach services
To recognize and respond to the demands of the needy.
Dispense clothing, payment vouchers for food, shelter, medical, transportation on a non-sectarian basis to any resident of miami county where there is a need.
To provide food,clothing and other assistance including living and medical for the poor and needy
The society of st vincent de paul (svp) charity is a christian voluntary organization working with poor and disadvantaged people. inspired by our principal founder, frederic ozanam, and our patron, st vincent de paul, we seek to respond to…
We offer understanding, hope, and immediate relief to those in need without regard to race, religion, or national origin. we aid with emergency food, rent, utilities, and other basic necessities in time of crisis.
We provide assistance to the poor and needy. We help with utility bills, lodging, food, prescriptions, and furniture. We also provide sack meals to children in need over the weekend.
To extend our compassion to the needy in society by participating in charitable events and community services.To promote the philosophy and teachings of Shirdi Sai Baba to achieve human ideals of equality, coexistence and selflessness.To…
Charity
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Emergency Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sai Seva Sadan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SRI SATHYA SAI GLOBAL COUNCIL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELLAS INC ↗
- Who funds St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds SAI SEVA SADAN ↗
- Who funds MYSORE MEDICAL COLLEGE GRADUATES ASSOCIATION OF N AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS EMERGENCY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ST PETERSBURG LIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sss Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Homeless Emergency Project Inc — 15% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.