Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sports Complex Special Services District

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$170kPublic Benefit$128kHealth$126kRecreation & Sports$64kEnvironment$60kCommunity Improvement$51kYouth Development$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PHILADELPHIA CITY FUND$100,000
EAGLES AUTISM FOUNDATION$10,000
FLYERS CHARITIES$10,000
PHILLIES CHARITIES INC$10,000
PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION$10,000
DELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$7,287
HERO THRILL SHOW INC CO 3RD POLICE DISTRICT$5,000
ST RICHARD CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%PHILLIES CHARITIES INC CO THE ALS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 7%PHILLIES CHARITIES INC CO THE ALS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 7%HERO THRILL SHOW INC CO 3RD POLICE DISTRICT: $5k → 22%PHILLIES CHARITIES INC CO THE ALS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 7%HERO THRILL SHOW INC CO 3RD POLICE DISTRICT: $5k → 22%PHILLIES CHARITIES INC CO THE ALS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%HERO THRILL SHOW INC CO 3RD POLICE DISTRICT: $3k → 22%HERO THRILL SHOW INC CO 3RD POLICE DISTRICT: $3k → 22%CITY OF PHILADELPHIA: $128k → 22%FRIENDS OF FDR PARK: $55k → 22%EAGLES AUTISM FOUNDATION: $18k → 22%PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $10k → 22%EAGLES AUTISM FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $10k → 22%DELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $8k → 22%DELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $8k → 22%PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $8k → 22%PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $8k → 22%EAGLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8k → 22%EAGLES AUTISM FOUNDATION: $8k → 22%EAGLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8k → 22%EAGLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8k → 22%FLYERS CHARITIES: $13k → 22%EAGLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8k → 22%FLYERS CHARITIES: $10k → 22%DELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $7k → 22%PHILLIES CHARITIES INC: $10k → 22%DELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $7k → 22%FLYERS CHARITIES: $10k → 22%DELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $7k → 22%PHILLIES CHARITIES INC: $10k → 22%DELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $6k → 22%PHILLIES CHARITIES INC: $8k → 22%DELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $6k → 22%PHILLIES CHARITIES INC: $8k → 22%DELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $6k → 22%FLYERS CHARITIES: $8k → 22%PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $5k → 22%FLYERS CHARITIES: $8k → 22%EAGLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%FLYERS CHARITIES: $8k → 22%PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $5k → 22%FLYERS CHARITIES: $8k → 22%FRIENDS OF FDR PARK: $4k → 22%PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $4k → 22%ST RICHARD CHURCH: $2k → 22%THE PHILADELPHIA CITY FUND: $100k → 22%CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT: $9k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$379k · 11 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$379k
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
-3%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Comcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives
    7× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +77%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT PARK
    3× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue ×79 · 65% of their budget
  • PP
    PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $49k · revenue +58% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2020 · $128k
  • CO
    CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • PA
    Police Athletic League Of Philadelphia
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Police Athletic League of Philadelphia
Youth Development
2
Philadelphia Fund Alliance

The philadelphia fund alliance is a group of philadelphia-based asset management industry professionals formed to hold an annual fundraiser to benefit one or more charities in the greater philadelphia area. our motto and mission is "making…

Philanthropy
3
Philadelphia Police Foundation

The philadelphia police foundation was established to receive and administer grants and contributions to provide important support and resources to the philadelphia police department to assist the department in ensuring the safety and…

Crime & Legal
4
Golf Association of Philadelphia Foundation
Recreation & Sports
5
Philadelphia Green Capital Corp

The philadelphia green capital corp. connects projects to capital (public, private and philanthropic) to drive a robust, equitable clean energy market in the greater philadelphia region, support the philadelphia energy authority, and…

Community Improvement
6
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
7
The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc

The philadelphia cultural fund was established by the city of philadelphia to conduct grant making activity and provide assistance to local arts organizations.

Arts & Culture
8
Philly Races Inc

Philly races, inc. is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes, and specifically to be a collaborative advocate for the city of philadelphia parks and recreation department (ppr).

Recreation & Sports
9
Philadelphia Activities Fund Inc

Philadelphia activities fund is a nonprofit corporation organized for the purpose of providing funds to support, enhance and serve community and recreation organizations and activities within the city of philadelphia (including, without…

Recreation & Sports
10
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
11
Parkway Council Foundation

Works to accelerate the transformation of philadelphia's benjamin franklin parkway into a great urban park for all.

Recreation & Sports
12
Golf Association of Philadelphia

To preserve, protect, and promote the game of golf.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Eagles Charitable Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Packer Park Civic Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA: $128,008 · OtherCITY OF PHILADELPHIAComcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives: $62,500 · OtherComcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For LivesFRIENDS OF FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT PARK: $59,700 · OtherFRIENDS OF FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT PARKDELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSO CIATION INC: $55,396 · OtherDELAWARE VALLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSO CIATION INCPHILLIES CHARITIES INC CO THE ALS ASSOCIATION: $28,000 · OtherPHILLIES CHARITIES INC CO THE ALS ASSOCIATIONHERO THRILL SHOW INC CO 3RD POLICE DISTRICT: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $14,532 · OtherPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INCPACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $48,750 · Community ImprovementPACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATI…PHILLIES CHARITIES INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyPHILLIES CHA…THE EAGLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHE EAGLES C…EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC: $35,000 · HealthPolice Athletic League Of Philadelphia: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$363,136Community Improvement$148,750Philanthropy$70,000Health$35,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetComcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives: $62,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT PARK: $59,700 over 3y, 65% of budgetPACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $48,750 over 7y, 33% of budgetPHILLIES CHARITIES INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EAGLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetPolice Athletic League Of Philadelphia: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Comcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT PARK ↗
  • Who funds PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIES CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EAGLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Police Athletic League Of Philadelphia ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sports Complex Special Services District funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sports Complex Special Services District. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sports Complex Special Services District?

    Find your warmest path to Sports Complex Special Services District through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sports Complex Special Services District’s filings →

    More from the funding graph