Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Spatt Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$165kReligion$43kArts & Culture$5kEducation$5kHuman Services$886Membership Benefit$760Food & Nutrition$480Health$400Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$460k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHESTER SPATT DONOR ADVISED FUND$61,178
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$5,784
SEC HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$500
BETH HAMEDRASH HAGODOL-BETH JACOB CONG$360
412 FRIENDS OF ZAHAL$180
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $150) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $150 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$214k · 17 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against -34% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$214k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-34%

Still filing today

35%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +13%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    4× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +51%
  • NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $400 · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH - ISRAEL RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • BS
    BETH SHALOM SISTERHOOD TORAH FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $300
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF SEC ALUMNI INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
2
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
4
University of Judaism Foundation
5
Jewish Federation of Greater Clifton-Passaic
6
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
7
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

The society is a multidisciplinary professional medical organization dedicated to improving human health by advancing nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy.

Health
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
10
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

The jewish federation of greater philadelphia mobilizes financial and volunteer resources to create a bright future for jewish people everywhere. the jewish federation cares for those in need, combats antisemitism and global crises, and…

Philanthropy
12
Hebrew Free Loan Association of Tucson Inc

The hebrew free loan association of tucson dba tucson jewish free loan provides interest-free financial assistance empowering people to promote self-sufficiency with dignity.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Association On Aging and the most unlike its peers is New Centerville & Rural Volunteer Fire Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CHESTER SPATT DONOR ADVISED FUND — $158,994 · OtherTHE CHESTER SPATT DONOR ADVISED FUNDCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM — $40,585 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM+20 more — $6,837 · OtherSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $4,750 · Arts & CultureThe Trustees of Princeton University — $4,500 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $3,600 · PhilanthropyHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH — $350 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $400 · HealthJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING — $150 · Human ServicesNEW CENTERVILLE & RURAL VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY — $100 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$206,416Arts & Culture$4,750Education$4,500Philanthropy$3,950Health$400Human Services$150Public Safety & Disaster$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $4,750 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND dba JEWISH ASSISTANCE FUND — $436 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH — $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW CENTERVILLE & RURAL VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND dba JEWISH ASSISTANCE FUND
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING
  • Who funds NEW CENTERVILLE & RURAL VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic Foundation · David S Shapira Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Spatt Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph