Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Texas · Public charity

Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council

To reduce death/disability related to trauma, disaster and acute illness through implementation of a well-planned and coordinated regional emergency response system.

$4.9M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
33
Itemized grants FY2024
25
Organizations funded FY2023
8%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$453k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$10,765
Largest grant, FY2024
$47,575
Organizations funded a year
20 to 58
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$23M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 8% of the organizations Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council funded were first-time grantees, receiving 7% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving33$453k45%
FY202325$341k8%
FY202223$335k4%
FY202158$17M57%
FY202030$9.0M13%
FY201925$5.0M24%
FY201828$3.6M39%
FY201720$805kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$29MPublic Safety & Disaster$5.9MHousing & Shelter$987k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Crosspoint Inc$3,462,886420%
Clarity Child Guidance Center$1,051,60023%
Haven for Hope of Bexar County$987,18141%
Community EMS Inc$75,45453%
Christus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation$19,85010%
Canyon Lake Fireems$17,683159%
EMS of Nueces Canyon$13,92523%
Harper Volunteer Fire Department Inc$9,33615%
Lone Star Ambulance 1 LLC$9,0271n/a
Frio Canyon EMS Inc$7,03013%

Plus 82 recipients with no EIN on record ($30M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 9 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCrosspoint Inc: $3,462,886 over 4y, 20% of budgetClarity Child Guidance Center: $1,051,600 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $987,181 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCommunity EMS Inc: $75,454 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetChristus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation: $19,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanyon Lake Fireems: $17,683 over 1y, 59% of budgetEMS of Nueces Canyon: $13,925 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetHarper Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $9,336 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetFrio Canyon EMS Inc: $7,030 over 1y, 3.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council with peer funders

About Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council

How much does Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council give?
Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council reported 33 itemized grants totaling $452,560, out of $4,945,647 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 20 and 58 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (81%), Public Safety & Disaster (16%), Housing & Shelter (3%).
Who are Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Crosspoint Inc ($3.5M), Clarity Child Guidance Center ($1.1M), Haven for Hope of Bexar County ($987k).
Does Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council based?
Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home