· Public charity
Southern Rivers Energy Trust
To provide financial assistance for charitable and educational projects within the communities of southern rivers energy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $64,439 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $162,475 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $98,036 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MONROE COUNTY KINGDOM BUILDERS | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF DISABLED ADULTS | $10,000 |
| UNITED IN PINK | $10,000 |
| KATOM RESTAURANT SUPPLY INC | $8,582 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS OF CENTRAL MIDWE | $7,500 |
| MERIWETHER COUNTY FAMILY CONNECTION | $7,000 |
| MAKE A WISH GA | $6,157 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC2× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue -28%
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC2× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +69%
- GEGEORGIA EXTENSION 4-H FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2024 · $15k
Funded once
- GKGODS KINGDOM BUILDERS CHURCH OF JESUS CHRISTone grant, 2020 · $17k
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +1%- WBWOODBURY BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice.
To enable all young people to realize their full potential
Gwinnett medical group, inc., (gmgi),was formed for the purpose of establishing and operating certain hospital based and clinical outreach physician services with our service community. gmgi employs specialty physicians that serve patients…
Georgia alliance for breast cancer mission is to engage with georgia's breast cancer community to increase access to care and reduce disparities in cancer outcomes.
To partner with patients and communities to support wellness through compassionate, quality healthcare.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
To provide high quality, cost effective health care and to promote wellness throughout our community.
Girl Scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a better place.
Childrens cancer partners' mission is to provide resources, community, and compassion to children with cancer and their families.
Building girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.
To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.
The Carroll County Child Advocacy Center exists to champion the needs of sexually, physically, and emotionally abused children in Carroll, Haralson and Heard counties through prevention, intervention and collaboration.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Georgia Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rebuild Lamar Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 21% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds REBUILD LAMAR INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCESINC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF DISABLED ADULTS & CHILDREN TOO INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED IN PINK INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH CENTRAL GEORGIA ↗
- Who funds ADVENTURE BAGS INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL GEORGIA ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Southern Crescent Technical College Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds KATLYN'S PROMISE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Southern Rivers Energy Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.