Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Southern New Jersey Perinatal Cooperative

Founded in 1982, the cooperative works to improve the system of care, maximize resources, address gaps in care and identify regional needs.

$649k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$436k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.5MHuman Services$979kEducation$832kYouth Development$373kReligion$312kCommunity Improvement$149kEmployment$50kOther$1.5M
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $629,108 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $649,108 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $111k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $436k
$24,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREEN HEALTHY HOMES$436,088
CITY OF VINELAND$74,750
PRAC$36,620
COMMUNITY DOULAS OF SOUTH JERSEY$24,000
KENNEDY MEDICAL GROUP$20,000
NAZARENE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$20,000
VIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
THE LEADERSHIP STUDIO$7,650
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $979k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPTS: $25k → 6%SISTERHOOD INC: $102k → 7%SISTERHOOD INC: $97k → 7%ACENDA: $119k → 8%BURLINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION: $6k → 7%ACENDA: $46k → 8%PRAC: $37k → 11%PRAC: $208k → 11%PRAC: $188k → 11%PRAC: $152k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.2M · 21 repeat orgs$612k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
16

Total granted

$5.2M
$582k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+39%

Still filing today

67%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CAMDEN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $706k · revenue +76%
  • GH
    GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $630k · revenue +31%
  • PR
    Puerto Rican Action Committe of Southern NJ Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $585k · revenue +208%

Funded once

  • EC
    ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $102k · revenue -1%
  • MP
    MISSION PARTNERS GROUP
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $61k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Camcare Health Corporation

Camcare health corp provides high quality comprehensive primary health care services to families served in and around the city of camden, new jersey, as well as camden and gloucester counties

Health
2
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
3
New Jersey Health Care Quality Institute Inc

The Organization's mission is to improve the safety, quality, and affordability of healthcare for everyone.

4
Central Jersey Medical Center Inc

The central jersey medical center is first and foremost a community health center. the needs of our community govern the programs and partnerships we build and the services we offer to the public.

Health
5
Nj Center for the Healing Arts Inc

Preventive mental health services

6
Healthcare Quality Strategies Inc

Improve the quality of healthcare in new jersey.

Health
7
Trenton Health Team Inc

Trenton Health Team's mission is to improve community health and well-being in the community of greater Trenton, New Jersey.

Health
8
Healthcare Institute of New Jersey Inc

To provide advocacy, research, analysis, communication and publication of information concerning healthcare products, r & d, their manufacture and marketing as they pertain to new jersey's pharmaceutical and medical technology industry.

9
Care Plus Nj Inc

This agency is dedicated to excellence in mental healthcare and has commitment to life- long support needed by individuals and their families to ensure that they achieve their full potential to improve the quality of their lives.

Health
10
Metropolitan Family Health Network

Metropolitan family health network, inc operates a healthcare center in jersey city, new jersey to provide a broad range of health services to a largely underserved population.

Health
11
New Jersey Primary Care Association Inc

The mission of the new jersey primary care association is to plan, promote and facilitate equal access to quality health care for individuals and families through organized primary care centers and center networks that seek to maintain…

12
New Jersey Mental Health Institute Inc

New jersey mental health institute, inc. aims to promote quality mental health and substance use services through training, technical assistance, research and policy development.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camden Area Health Education Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Leadership Studio Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersCommunity Health and Social…Youth Development and Suppo…Regional Healthcare SystemsPrivate Charitable Foundati…Early Childhood Care and Ed…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr15%12%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr15%19%35–55yr12%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr15%14%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr15%38%35–55yr12%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
14%
2,835/20,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF VINELAND — $450,261 · OtherCITY OF VINELANDCOMMUNITY DOULAS OF SOUTH JERSEY — $355,616 · OtherCOMMUNITY DOULAS OF SOUTH JERS…HEALING WINGS PENTECOSTAL TEMPLE OF GLASSBORO INC — $235,862 · OtherHEALING WINGS PENTECOSTAL TEMP…CAMDEN COUNTY COLLEGE — $163,400 · OtherCAMDEN COUNTY COLLEGEMISSION PARTNERS GROUP — $75,301 · OtherSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $61,237 · OtherBLUEWIRE MEDIA — $55,300 · Other+7 more — $148,652 · Other+7 moreGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC — $629,984 · HealthGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATI…Cherry Hill Free Clinic Inc — $499,774 · HealthCherry Hill Free Clinic IncPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $99,328 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN…CAPE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC — $92,764 · HealthCAPE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE IN…TRUTH INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $81,000 · Health+6 more — $138,424 · Health+6 morePuerto Rican Action Committe of Southern NJ Inc — $584,799 · Human ServicesPuerto Rican Action…SISTERHOOD INC — $198,428 · Human ServicesSISTERHOOD INCACENDA INC DBA ACENDA INTEGRATED HEALTH — $164,774 · Human ServicesACENDA INC DBA ACEN…+2 more — $30,753 · Human ServicesCAMDEN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $706,497 · EducationCAMDEN AREA HEAL…ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE — $102,168 · EducationESSEX COUNTY COL…+1 more — $22,899 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ATLANTIC CITY INC — $339,014 · Youth DevelopmentRISING LEADERS GLOBAL — $33,701 · Youth DevelopmentNAZARENE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $312,144 · ReligionThe Leadership Studio Inc — $123,717 · Community ImprovementSTAND UP FOR SALEM — $25,050 · Community ImprovementMID-ATLANTIC STATES CAREER & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $50,000 · Employment
Other$1,545,629Health$1,541,274Human Services$978,754Education$831,564Youth Development$372,715Religion$312,144Community Improvement$148,767Employment$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMDEN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $706,497 over 4y, 15% of budgetGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC — $629,984 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetPuerto Rican Action Committe of Southern NJ Inc — $584,799 over 4y, 17% of budgetCherry Hill Free Clinic Inc — $499,774 over 3y, 43% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ATLANTIC CITY INC — $339,014 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetNAZARENE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $312,144 over 5y, 12% of budgetACENDA INC DBA ACENDA INTEGRATED HEALTH — $164,774 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Leadership Studio Inc — $123,717 over 6y, 20% of budgetESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE — $102,168 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $99,328 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAPE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC — $92,764 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetTRUTH INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $81,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $61,237 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamden Coalition Inc — $51,127 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMID-ATLANTIC STATES CAREER & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetRISING LEADERS GLOBAL — $33,701 over 2y, 15% of budgetFAMCARE INC — $32,570 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSTAND UP FOR SALEM — $25,050 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF TEEN SUICIDE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS OF WHITESBORO INC — $22,899 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetKENNEDY MEDICAL GROUP PRACTICE PC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERINATAL HEALTH EQUITY FOUNDATION — $14,727 over 1y, 16% of budgetChildren's Futures Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW JERSEY ASSOCIATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH — $9,179 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBURLINGTON COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $5,753 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ30.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Oceanfirst Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Central Jersey Family Health Consortium Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Southern New Jersey Perinatal Cooperative funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc100% of income from government
  • Acenda Inc Dba Acenda Integrated Health69% of income from government
  • Children's Futures Inc46% of income from government
  • Stand Up for Salem23% of income from government
  • Famcare Inc22% of income from government
  • Rising Leaders Global2% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph