Skip to content

· Public charity

Southern Center for Human Rights

The Southern Center for Human Rights is working for equality, dignity, and justice for people impacted by the criminal legal system in the Deep South.

$99k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

68% of Southern Center for Human Rights’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Global Impact, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Southern Center for Human Rights named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $99k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’20
2
’21
3
’22
1
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Civil Rights$98kCrime & Legal$94kInternational$47kYouth Development$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kEnvironment$16k
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,740
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEEP CENTER$20,000
NATIONAL INCARCERATION ASSOCI$15,740
GACDL$15,740
WOMEN ON THE RISE$15,740
SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC$15,740
MOTHERHOOD BEYOND BARS$15,740
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOMEN ON THE RISE: $16k → 14%RestoreHer USAmerica Inc: $23k → 6%NAACP-GA: $50k → 13%GACDL: $16k → 14%Global Impact: $47k → 9%RESTOREHER US AMERICA: $23k → 13%SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $16k → 13%RESTOREHER US AMERICA: $10k → 13%NATIONAL INCARCERATION ASSOCI: $16k → 13%GEORGIA JUSTICE PROJECT: $40k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Center for Human Rights

The Southern Center for Human Rights is working for equality, dignity, and justice for people impacted by the criminal legal system in the Deep South. SCHR fights for a world free from mass incarceration, the death penalty, the…

Civil Rights
2
Georgia Innocence Project Inc

Georgia innocence project (gip) is an independent organization that works holistically to free innocent people from georgia prisons, to assist exonerees with rebuilding their lives in freedom, and mitigate the causes and consequences of…

Crime & Legal
3
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
4
Prison Policy Initiative

The Organization challenges over-criminalizationand mass incarceration through research, advocacyand organizing.

Civil Rights
5
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
6
National Police Accountability Project Inc

To promote the accountability of law enforcement officers and their employers for violations of the Constitution or laws of the United States.

Crime & Legal
7
The Weldon Project

The Weldon Project (TWP) is a non-profit organization that advocates on behalf of currently or formerly incarcerated drug offenders who were sentenced to prison for nonviolent drug offenses. TWP has adopted a multifaceted approach to…

Crime & Legal
8
Root & Rebound

Root & rebound's mission is to restore power and resources to the families and communities most harmed by mass incarceration through legal advocacy, public education, policy reform and litigation model rooted in the needs and expertise of…

Crime & Legal
9
National Black Womens Justice Institite Inc
—
10
Daughters Beyond Incarceration

DBI vision is for every daughter with an incarcerated parent to live a healthy stable life and have a strong, positive, relationship with her parent during and after incarceration.

Youth Development
11
Georgia Asylum & Immigration Network Inc

To protect and empower immigrant survivors of crime and persecution.

Crime & Legal
12
Network on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children

LSPC organizes communities impacted by the criminal justice system and advocates to release incarcerated people, to restore human and civil rights and to reunify families and communities. We build public awareness of structural racism in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Justice Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Restoreher Usamerica Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGIA JUSTICE PROJECT INC: $40,000 · Crime & LegalGEORGIA JUSTICE PROJECT …National Incarceration Assoc Inc: $15,740 · Crime & LegalNational Incarceration A…MOTHERHOOD BEYOND BARS INC: $15,740 · Crime & LegalMOTHERHOOD BEYOND BARS I…RESTOREHER USAMERICA INC: $55,000 · Civil RightsRESTOREHER USAMERICA INCSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $15,740 · Civil RightsSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUN…NAACP GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE: $50,000 · OtherNAACP GEORGIA STATE CO…GEORGIA ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS INC: $15,740 · OtherGEORGIA ASSOCIATION OF…DEEP CENTER INCORPORATED: $60,000 · Arts & CultureDEEP CENTER INCORPOR…Global Impact: $47,466 · InternationalGlobal ImpactSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $15,740 · Environment
Crime & Legal$71,480Civil Rights$70,740Other$65,740Arts & Culture$60,000International$47,466Environment$15,740

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEEP CENTER INCORPORATED: $60,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetRESTOREHER USAMERICA INC: $55,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetGlobal Impact: $47,466 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA JUSTICE PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNational Incarceration Assoc Inc: $15,740 over 1y, 11% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $15,740 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $15,740 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERHOOD BEYOND BARS INC: $15,740 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetGEORGIA ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS INC: $15,740 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southern Center for Human Rights funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southern Center for Human Rights. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southern Center for Human Rights’ filings →

    More from the funding graph