Skip to content

California · Public charity

Southern California Tennis Association

Scta is a non-profit organization, composed of member clubs, that gets and keeps southern californians engaged in tennis.

$402k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$63,865
Largest grant, FY2024
$129,768
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$11M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations Southern California Tennis Association funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $482k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’23
PhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$402k25%
FY20236$482k100%
FY20211$79k100%
FY20204$40k100%
FY20183$18k33%
FY20175$76kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.0MPhilanthropy$71k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Southern California Tennis Association by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Youth Tennis San Diego$218,91722%
Candid$134,73820%
United States Tennis Association Incorporated$79,12910%
San Diego District Tennis Association$52,250222%
Southern California Tennis Association Foundation$25,000114%
Parent Booster USA Inc$13,7501n/a
Neighborhood Junior Tennis Program Inc$10,5002n/a
Tga Sports Foundation$7,000117%
Tennis Patrons Assoc of Santa Barbara$5,00015%
Orange County Community Tennis Association$5,000111%
Greater San Diego City Tennis Counc$5,00014%
Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Los Angeles$5,00010%
Sloane Stephens Foundation Inc$5,0001n/a

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($531k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Southern California Tennis Association supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYouth Tennis San Diego: $218,917 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCandid: $134,738 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUnited States Tennis Association Incorporated: $79,129 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Diego District Tennis Association: $52,250 over 2y, 22% of budgetSouthern California Tennis Association Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTga Sports Foundation: $7,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetTennis Patrons Assoc of Santa Barbara: $5,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetOrange County Community Tennis Association: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetGreater San Diego City Tennis Counc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Los Angeles: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Southern California Tennis Association with peer funders

About Southern California Tennis Association

How much does Southern California Tennis Association give?
Southern California Tennis Association reported 6 grants totaling $402,408 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Southern California Tennis Association fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (94%), Philanthropy (6%).
Who are Southern California Tennis Association's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Youth Tennis San Diego ($219k), Candid ($135k), United States Tennis Association Incorporated ($79k).
Does Southern California Tennis Association fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Southern California Tennis Association?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The San Diego Foundation, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Southern California Tennis Association based?
Southern California Tennis Association is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Southern California Tennis Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph