Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Southern Bank Community Foundation for Phelps County

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$128kCommunity Improvement$47kHealth$37kCrime & Legal$32kHuman Services$30kFood & Nutrition$16kHousing & Shelter$10kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$817k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROLLA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
PHELPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI$9,000
NEWBURG R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
ROLLA REGIONAL ECONOMIC COMMISSION$4,100
PHELPS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$3,500
ST JAMES PARKS DEPARTMENT$2,400
HOPE ALLIANCE OF MISSOURI$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 16%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI: $10k → 16%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI: $9k → 16%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $6k → 16%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI: $4k → 16%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI: $3k → 16%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI: $3k → 16%GREATER ROLLA AREA CHARITABLE ENTERPRISE: $3k → 16%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $3k → 16%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$274k · 12 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
21

Total granted

$274k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
+67%

Still filing today

58%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
    2× · 2018–2019 · $35k · revenue +789%
  • CO
    CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI
    6× · 2019–2025 · $32k · revenue +14%
  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
    3× · 2022–2024 · $18k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • AR
    ARTS ROLLAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +109%
  • MP
    Missouri Patriot Pawsgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue ×19
  • RH
    RUSSELL HOUSE RESPONSE TO DOMESTICgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +147%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Ozarks Private Industry Council

Central Ozarks Private Industry Council, Incorporated (COPIC) strives to provide all customers with access to professional, high-quality workforce development services, resulting in sustainable employment and contributing to positive…

Employment
2
Franklin County Children & Families Comm Unity Resource Board Association

To encourage development and full utilization of community resources to build and sustain a comprehensive mental health system of care for children and families in Franklin County, MO.

Human Services
3
Perry County Services Inc

Provide support services to developmentally disabled individuals of perry county,missouri through areas of community employment, job preparation, day programs, transportation and personal assistance.

Human Services
4
Gibson Center for Behavioral Change

The Gibson Center for Behavorial Change is committed to providing comprehensive services which promote new behaviors for a healthy lifestyle.

Health
5
Palouse River Counseling Center Inc

To provide mental health and chemical dependency prevention and treatment programs in Whitman County, Washington.

Health
6
Crisis Center of Russell County

The Crisis Center of Russell County was organized to provide assistance and temporary housing to victims of domestic abuse through secured temporary housing and education with job placement to transition them back into society. In…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Help Services of Carroll County

Provide services, food commodities, utility payment funds, cancer treatment funds to low-income residents of the carroll county, missouri area.

Human Services
8
West Plains Regional Animal Shelter

To Provide a safe place for animals and unite them with permanent homes

Animals
9
Copiah County Human Resource Agency

To provide a safe and customer friendly service to the citizens in a manner consistent with the agencys Steaerdship of the communities trust and resources.

Philanthropy
10
Rural Prosperity Center

To advance the socioeconomic and environmental well-being of rural communities.

Human Services
11
St Charles County Economic Development Council

To help build a stronger, thriving, and self-supporting economy for st. charles county.

12
Missouri Coalition of Recovery Support Providers

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to support organizations providing recovery programs.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Rolla Area Charitable Enter and the most unlike its peers is Fine Linen Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROLLA PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $93,115 · OtherROLLA PUBLIC SCHOOLSIndividual grant recipient — $10,095 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPHELPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherPHELPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONRUSSELL HOUSE — $8,000 · OtherPHELPS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $6,500 · Other+19 more — $53,537 · Other+19 moreCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI — $31,675 · Human ServicesCASA OF SOUTH CENTR…THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $18,300 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY PARTN…RUSSELL HOUSE RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC — $5,000 · Human ServicesRUSSELL HOUSE RESPO…GREATER ROLLA AREA CHARITABLE ENTER — $3,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $35,000 · HealthSOUTH CENTR…Rolla Regional Economic Commission — $24,600 · Community ImprovementRolla Reg…PHELPS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $4,100 · Community ImprovementPHELPS CO…HOPE ALLIANCE OF MISSOURI — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST CHARLES COUNTY — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentPhelps County Dream Center — $16,000 · Food & NutritionMissouri Patriot Paws — $5,000 · Animals
Other$181,247Human Services$57,975Health$35,000Community Improvement$28,700Youth Development$21,000Food & Nutrition$16,000Animals$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI — $31,675 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetRolla Regional Economic Commission — $24,600 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetHOPE ALLIANCE OF MISSOURI — $20,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $18,300 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPhelps County Dream Center — $16,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetPHELPS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $6,500 over 2y, 56% of budgetRUSSELL HOUSE RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPHELPS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $4,100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER ROLLA AREA CHARITABLE ENTER — $3,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFine Linen Theatre — $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPREVENTION CONSULTANTS OF MISSOURI — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST CHARLES COUNTY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI
  • Who funds Rolla Regional Economic Commission
  • Who funds HOPE ALLIANCE OF MISSOURI
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds Phelps County Dream Center
  • Who funds PHELPS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds ARTS ROLLA
  • Who funds Missouri Patriot Paws
  • Who funds RUSSELL HOUSE RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC
  • Who funds PHELPS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORP
  • Who funds GREATER ROLLA AREA CHARITABLE ENTER
  • Who funds Fine Linen Theatre
  • Who funds PREVENTION CONSULTANTS OF MISSOURI
  • Who funds GREAT CIRCLE
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST CHARLES COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Southern Bank Community Foundation for Phelps County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Southern Bank Community Foundation for Phelps County?

    Find your warmest path to Southern Bank Community Foundation for Phelps County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph