· Public charity
Southeast Rural Community Assistance Project Inc
Southeast rural community assistance project, inc.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $315k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $245k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TOWN OF WHITE STONE | $125,250 |
| FALWELL CORPORATION | $69,715 |
| TOWN OF GRETNA | $50,000 |
| TOWN OF WYTHEVILLE | $47,820 |
| COUNTY OF ACCOMACK | $44,100 |
| TOWN OF FRIES | $40,275 |
| TOWN OF GLEN LYN | $34,562 |
| GILES COUNTY PSA | $27,500 |
| L & M CONSTRUCTION | $24,500 |
| OAK HILL ACADEMY | $24,382 |
| MILLER & MILLER CONSTRUCTION INC | $21,560 |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD | $19,363 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,357 |
| TAZEWELL COUNTY PSA | $14,601 |
| RAPPAHANNOCK EDUCATION FARM | $7,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $354k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TOTOWN OF WHITE STONE2× · 2023–2025 · $204k
- TOTOWN OF VICTORIA2× · 2022–2024 · $160k
- COCITY OF GALAX2× · 2022–2023 · $100k
Funded once
- TOTOWN OF SOUTH BOSTONone grant, 2023 · $200k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $121k
- CBCHESAPEAKE BAY HOUSING INCone grant, 2022 · $104k · revenue -94%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rappahannock elder housing corporation owns and operates leaflin lane apartments. these subsidized one-bedroom units in culpeper, va are available for rent to persons age 62 and older who meet the low income criteria established by hud.
Build affordable housing for low wage earner families of middlesex county, virginia.
Housing loans to lower income persons
Habitat for Humanity Virginia provides support to Virginia affiliates so that they can build or facilitate affordable housing by offering advocacy, organizational development, funding, and resource development
In response to housing needs in our communities, we champion policies, developments, and programs for quality affordable housing in the Richmond region.
To provide modest, decent homes for low income families.
Central virginia housing coalition improves the regional quality of life by providing affordable housing opportunities to low income families through coalition, education, counseling, and financial assistance.
Provide housing to low-income families.
This organization is an affiliate of Habitat for Humanity International Inc. Their mission is to eliminate substandard housing within the counties of Gloucester and Mathews Virginia.
To provide housing for low-income elderly or handicapped tenants under section 202 of the national housing act.
Housing Resources Bainbridge is a community land trust, conserving land for permanently affordable housing. By making it possible for people of diverse backgrounds and incomes to live on Bainbridge, we are building a more equitable,…
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Southeast Rural Community Assistance Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southeast Rural Community Assistance Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Southeast Rural Community Assistance Project’s filings →