· Public charity
Southeast Rural Community Assistance Project Inc
Southeast rural community assistance project, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $323,655 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $387,969 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $64,314 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $83k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $240k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TOWN OF VICTORIA | $140,319 |
| PEOPLE INC | $50,000 |
| SUSSEX SERVICE AUTHORITY | $50,000 |
| TOWN OF NARROWS INC | $40,000 |
| EASTERN SHORE OF VIRGINIA | $17,800 |
| TOWN OF PAMPLIN | $13,860 |
| MID-ATLANTIC EPISCOPAL DISTRICT AME ZION CHURCH | $11,676 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $172k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TOTOWN OF VICTORIA2× · 2022–2024 · $160k
- COCITY OF GALAX2× · 2022–2023 · $100k
- TBTHOMAS BRIDGE WATER CORPORATION2× · 2021–2022 · $45k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- TOTOWN OF SOUTH BOSTONone grant, 2023 · $200k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $121k
- CBCHESAPEAKE BAY HOUSING INCone grant, 2022 · $104k · revenue -94%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Build affordable housing for low wage earner families of middlesex county, virginia.
Habitat for Humanity Virginia provides support to Virginia affiliates so that they can build or facilitate affordable housing by offering advocacy, organizational development, funding, and resource development
Central virginia housing coalition improves the regional quality of life by providing affordable housing opportunities to low income families through coalition, education, counseling, and financial assistance.
To provide modest, decent homes for low income families.
To assist the city of Virginia Beach by partnering with the public and private sectors to provide quality affordable housing opportunities to low and moderate income people.
In response to housing needs in our communities, we champion policies, developments, and programs for quality affordable housing in the Richmond region.
Rappahannock elder housing corporation owns and operates leaflin lane apartments. these subsidized one-bedroom units in culpeper, va are available for rent to persons age 62 and older who meet the low income criteria established by hud.
Provide housing to low-income families.
This organization is an affiliate of Habitat for Humanity International Inc. Their mission is to eliminate substandard housing within the counties of Gloucester and Mathews Virginia.
Housing Resources Bainbridge is a community land trust, conserving land for permanently affordable housing. By making it possible for people of diverse backgrounds and incomes to live on Bainbridge, we are building a more equitable,…
VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fluvannalouisa Housing Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Davis Center Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds THOMAS BRIDGE WATER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ROCKBRIDGE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds DAVIS CENTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLUVANNALOUISA HOUSING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BAY AGING ↗
- Who funds EASTERN SHORE OF VIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Southeast Rural Community Assistance Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.