Skip to content
South Pacific County Community Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

South Pacific County Community Foundation

To foster a dynamic, thriving community: the foundation achieved this by hosting educational or informative events for nonprofit organizations and donors; providing networking opportunities; highlighting nonprofits mission and projects through social media and giving catalog; and by managing its own, agency, and donor-directed funds.

$217k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$74k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$81kHealth$79kYouth Development$43kFood & Nutrition$38kRecreation & Sports$25kAnimals$12kEducation$11kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $109,526, the rows itemized in this filing. The $217,385 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $107,859 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $74k
$10,746
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OCEAN BEACH HOSPITAL FOUNDATI$73,732
OCEAN PARK FOOD BANK$11,211
PACIFIC STEM ROBOTICS CLUB$10,746
DYLAN JUDE HARREL COMM CTR$7,761
FOOD 4 KIDS BACKBACK PROGRAM$6,076
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOOD 4 KIDS BACKBACK PROGRAM: $6k → 9%PENNINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE: $9k → 14%PENNINSUAL POVERTY RESPONSE: $7k → 14%PENINSUAL POVERTY RESPONSE: $6k → 14%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL AT ST MARY'S PARISH: $7k → 14%PACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT: $16k → 14%DYLAN JUDE HARRELL COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 14%PACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT: $13k → 14%PACIFIC CO IMMIGRANT SUPPORT: $8k → 14%DYLAN JUDE HARREL COMM CTR: $8k → 14%PACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT: $8k → 14%PACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$148k · 5 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$148k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+32%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT
    5× · 2019–2023 · $51k · revenue +52%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC COUNTY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $27k · revenue +7%
  • BE
    BPO ELKS LODGE 1937
    2× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CA
    COASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -96% · 90% of their budget
  • SP
    SOUTH PACIFIC COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +24%
  • OP
    OCEAN PARK FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Pacific County Food Bank

As a faith based organization it is the mission of North Pacific County Food Bank to alleviate hunger and poverty by gathering and distributing food donations without cost to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
2
Oceanside Homeless Resource

Provide community resources for homeless

Human Services
3
Particular Council of Santa Cruz County Society of St Vincent De

Provides a food pantry service to homeless and low income families. Also provides in-home person-to-person financial assistance to families in financial crisis who may lack housing or food or health care.

Human Services
4
Shoreline Community Care

The purpose of Shoreline Community Care is to offer hope by providing financial, spiritual and practical resources for residents of Shoreline while helping them achieve a healthy budget and attain freedom from indebtedness. And to reduce…

Human Services
5
South Bay Seniors-People Helping People

South Bay Seniors-People Helping People (PHP) is an organization that collects, warehouses, and distributes bread, fruits, vegetables, and frozen foods to the elderly, needy and homeless. PHP also lends medical equipment such as walkers…

Community Improvement
6
Seattle Homeless Outreach

We provide emergency and humanitarian outreach services to our neighbors living outside. Our mission is to meet people where they are, without expectation or judgment

Human Services
7
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
8
Humboldt County Food Pantry

Provide a community food pantry to low-income residents in Humboldt County.

Food & Nutrition
9
Sisters Cold Weather Shelter

SCWS' mission is to unite the Sisters area community in a shared commitment to supporting our most vulnerable neighbors. We strive to ensure that every individual has access to life's essentials - from food and shelter to vital resources…

Housing & Shelter
10
Sunshine for Humanity Inc

Homeless Shelter

Health
11
Puget Sound Veterans Hope Center

To end Veteran homelessness by providing encouragement, resources and one-on-one support by Veterans helping Veterans.

Human Services
12
Willapa Harbor Helping Hands

Willapa Harbor Helping Hands was formed to financially assist local Pacific County Resident Cancer Patients and their families. For the patients not in need of financial assistance, the organization prepare and deliver meals and assist…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebuilding Together Pacific County; the most unlike its peers is Djh Kids and Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT: $51,351 · Human ServicesPACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORTDJH Kids and Community Center: $22,761 · Human ServicesDJH Kids and Community CenterPENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPR: $22,319 · Human ServicesPENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPRSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MARYS CONFERENCE: $7,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MARYS CON…FOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS: $6,076 · Human ServicesFOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDSOCEAN BEACH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $73,732 · HealthOCEAN BEACH HOSPITAL FOUNDAT…BPO ELKS LODGE 1937: $24,730 · OtherBPO ELKS LODGE 1937COASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH: $20,000 · OtherCOASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YO…PACIFIC STEM ROBOTICS CLUB: $10,746 · OtherPACIFIC STEM ROBOTICS C…EUGENE HEALTH & PERFORMANCE FOUNDATION: $5,269 · OtherEUGENE HEALTH & PERFORM…REBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC COUNTY: $26,901 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING…SOUTH PACIFIC COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $11,874 · AnimalsOCEAN PARK FOOD BANK: $9,934 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$109,507Health$73,732Other$60,745Housing & Shelter$26,901Animals$11,874Food & Nutrition$9,934

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOCEAN BEACH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $73,732 over 1y, 78% of budgetPACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT: $51,351 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC COUNTY: $26,901 over 2y, 17% of budgetDJH Kids and Community Center: $22,761 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPR: $22,319 over 3y, 10% of budgetCOASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH: $20,000 over 1y, 90% of budgetSOUTH PACIFIC COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $11,874 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetOCEAN PARK FOOD BANK: $9,934 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetFOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS: $6,076 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert M Zahl Founda…Amazonsmile Foundation
Herbert M Zahl FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert M Zahl Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization South Pacific County Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from South Pacific County Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on South Pacific County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home