· Community foundation
South Pacific County Community Foundation
To foster a dynamic, thriving community: the foundation achieved this by hosting educational or informative events for nonprofit organizations and donors; providing networking opportunities; highlighting nonprofits mission and projects through social media and giving catalog; and by managing its own, agency, and donor-directed funds.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $109,526 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $217,385 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $107,859 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $74k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OCEAN BEACH HOSPITAL FOUNDATI | $73,732 |
| OCEAN PARK FOOD BANK | $11,211 |
| PACIFIC STEM ROBOTICS CLUB | $10,746 |
| DYLAN JUDE HARREL COMM CTR | $7,761 |
| FOOD 4 KIDS BACKBACK PROGRAM | $6,076 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT5× · 2019–2023 · $51k · revenue +52%
- RTREBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC COUNTY2× · 2023–2024 · $27k · revenue +7%
- BEBPO ELKS LODGE 19372× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- CACOASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTHone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -96% · 90% of their budget
- SPSOUTH PACIFIC COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYone grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +24%
- OPOCEAN PARK FOOD BANKgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +83%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a faith based organization it is the mission of North Pacific County Food Bank to alleviate hunger and poverty by gathering and distributing food donations without cost to those in need.
Provide community resources for homeless
Provides a food pantry service to homeless and low income families. Also provides in-home person-to-person financial assistance to families in financial crisis who may lack housing or food or health care.
The purpose of Shoreline Community Care is to offer hope by providing financial, spiritual and practical resources for residents of Shoreline while helping them achieve a healthy budget and attain freedom from indebtedness. And to reduce…
South Bay Seniors-People Helping People (PHP) is an organization that collects, warehouses, and distributes bread, fruits, vegetables, and frozen foods to the elderly, needy and homeless. PHP also lends medical equipment such as walkers…
We provide emergency and humanitarian outreach services to our neighbors living outside. Our mission is to meet people where they are, without expectation or judgment
To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.
Provide a community food pantry to low-income residents in Humboldt County.
SCWS' mission is to unite the Sisters area community in a shared commitment to supporting our most vulnerable neighbors. We strive to ensure that every individual has access to life's essentials - from food and shelter to vital resources…
Homeless Shelter
To end Veteran homelessness by providing encouragement, resources and one-on-one support by Veterans helping Veterans.
Willapa Harbor Helping Hands was formed to financially assist local Pacific County Resident Cancer Patients and their families. For the patients not in need of financial assistance, the organization prepare and deliver meals and assist…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebuilding Together Pacific County and the most unlike its peers is Djh Kids and Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OCEAN BEACH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BPO ELKS LODGE 1937 ↗
- Who funds DJH Kids and Community Center ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPR ↗
- Who funds COASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds SOUTH PACIFIC COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OCEAN PARK FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MARYS CONFERENCE ↗
- Who funds FOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Herbert M Zahl Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization South Pacific County Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.