Skip to content

· Public charity

South Carolina United Methodist Foundation Inc

Provide endowment for united methodist institutions.

$689k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$909kHuman Services$869kReligion$266k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $635,720, the rows itemized in this filing. The $689,230 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,510 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $532k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESLEY COMMONS$103,428
EPWORTH CHILDRENS HOME$82,298
WOFFORD COLLEGE$76,241
SPARTANBURG METHODIST COLLEGE$72,994
COLUMBIA COLLEGE$67,920
CLAFLIN UNIVERSITY$65,830
UM MANOR OF THE PEE DEE$63,347
PICKENS HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
LIBERTY HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$12,000
LATIMER MEMORIAL UMC$10,724
INDIA HOOK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$9,733
PENDLETON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$9,303
SAMPIT UMC$6,000
SC CONFERENCE OF THE UMC$5,780
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $792k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%EPWORTH CHILDRENS HOME: $82k → 16%WESLEY COMMONS: $103k → 18%UM MANOR OF THE PEE DEE: $63k → 20%EPWORTH CHILDRENS HOME: $52k → 16%WESLEY COMMONS: $68k → 18%UM MANOR OF THE PEE DEE: $45k → 20%EPWORTH CHILDRENS HOME: $49k → 16%WESLEY COMMONS: $62k → 18%UM MANOR OF THE PEE DEE: $36k → 20%EPWORTH CHILDRENS HOME: $37k → 16%WESLEY COMMONS: $35k → 18%UM MANOR OF THE PEE DEE: $20k → 20%EPWORTH CHILDRENS HOME: $29k → 16%WESLEY COMMONS: $28k → 18%UM MANOR OF THE PEE DEE: $15k → 20%EPWORTH CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 16%WESLEY COMMONS: $24k → 18%UM MANOR OF THE PEE DEE: $14k → 20%EPWORTH CHILDRENS HOME: $9k → 16%WESLEY COMMONS: $9k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 14 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$2.0M
$16k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WESLEY COMMONS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $330k · revenue +44%
  • EC
    EPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME
    7× · 2019–2025 · $269k · revenue +42%
  • WOFFORD COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $241k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SC
    SC CONFERENCE OF THE UMC
    one grant, 2025 · $6k
  • OG
    OAK GROVE UMC
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
  • JU
    JORDAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
2
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
3
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
4
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
5
Erskine College and Theological Seminary

Erskine College exists to glorify God as a Christian academic community where students are equipped to flourish as whole persons for lives of service through the pursuit of undergraduate liberal arts and graduate theological education.

Education
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
8
Barclay College

The mission of barclay college is to prepare students in a bible-centered environment for effective christian life, service, and leadership.

Education
9
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
10
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
11
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
12
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wofford College; the most unlike its peers is United Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESLEY COMMONS: $330,065 · Human ServicesWESLEY COMMONSEPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME: $269,200 · Human ServicesEPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOMEUnited Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee: $192,261 · Human ServicesUnited Methodist Manor of the Pee DeeTHE METHODIST OAKS: $77,458 · Human ServicesTHE METHODIST OAKSSPARTANBURG METHODIST COLLEGE: $218,500 · EducationSPARTANBURG METHODIST COLLEGECOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $201,203 · EducationCOLUMBIA COLLEGECLAFLIN UNIVERSITY: $193,102 · EducationCLAFLIN UNIVERSITYWOFFORD COLLEGE: $241,464 · OtherWOFFORD COLLEGEFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $84,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHSCHOOL DISTRICT OF PICKENS COUNTY: $54,236 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT OF PICKENS COUN…INDIA HOOK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $50,509 · OtherINDIA HOOK UNITED METHODIST CHU…PENDLETON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $48,320 · OtherPENDLETON UNITED METHODIST CHUR…SAMPIT UMC: $36,000 · OtherSAMPIT UMCLATIMER MEMORIAL UMC: $31,151 · OtherLATIMER MEMORIAL UMC+3 more: $15,902 · Other
Human Services$868,984Education$612,805Other$561,582

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESLEY COMMONS: $330,065 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetEPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME: $269,200 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetWOFFORD COLLEGE: $241,464 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSPARTANBURG METHODIST COLLEGE: $218,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $201,203 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCLAFLIN UNIVERSITY: $193,102 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee: $192,261 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE METHODIST OAKS: $77,458 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESLEY COMMONS ↗
  • Who funds EPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds WOFFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SPARTANBURG METHODIST COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CLAFLIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds United Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee ↗
  • Who funds THE METHODIST OAKS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC5.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization South Carolina United Methodist Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from South Carolina United Methodist Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to South Carolina United Methodist Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to South Carolina United Methodist Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on South Carolina United Methodist’s filings →

    More from the funding graph