Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sous Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$466k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$161k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$2.0MInternational$506kCivil Rights$118kHealth$100kPhilanthropy$81kHuman Services$58kFood & Nutrition$28kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $241k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $161k
$5,149
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIOUS PROJECTS$160,849
UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL$46,629
BASMAH$35,793
MATW PROJECT USA$32,612
ORPHANS IN NEED USA$29,685
YEMEN AID$27,158
UNITED HANDS INC$21,954
HIDAYA FOUNDATION$20,300
AMOUD FOUNDATION$15,460
KHAN OHANA FOUNDATION$11,815
SOUND VISION FOUNDATION$8,000
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA$7,457
BAITULMAAL$6,618
OKLAHOMA ISLAMIC ACADEMY$5,149
Individual grant recipient$5,113
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INDIAN MUSLIM RELIEF CHARITIES: $6k → 8%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 21%MATW PROJECT USA: $33k → 9%INDIAN MUSLIM RELIEF CHARITIES: $6k → 8%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 21%INDIAN MUSLIM RELIEF CHARITIES: $515 → 8%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 24 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
12

Total granted

$2.8M
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+110%

Still filing today

71%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UP
    UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $193k · revenue +252%
  • UH
    UNITED HANDS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $86k · revenue +74%
  • HF
    HIDAYA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $81k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • OF
    OKLAHOMA FAITH NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • AM
    AL MAKASSED HOSPITAL - EAST JERUSAL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SR
    SAINT RITA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
2
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
3
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Zakah Aid and Charity Assisting Humanity

Zakat, aid and charity assisting humanity (zacah) is a minnesota-based grassroots organization dedicated to the collection and re-distribution of wealth, including zakat (mandatory charitable tax for all muslims) and sadaqah (any…

Religion
5
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
6
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
7
United Humanitarian Foundation

To provide humanitarian relief and programs to help, assist, and empower citizens in their communities for sustainability and human development.

Human Services
8
Islamic Medical Association of North America

Imana fosters health promotion, disease prevention, and health maintenance in communities around the world through direct patient care, health programs, and advocacy.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Muslim Response Usa for Relief and Development

To provide material and financial assistance to relieve the sufferings of any and all persons affected by disasters. conflicts, disease. and hunger, irrespective of race. creed or ethnicity. To support schools and other learning centers…

International
10
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
11
Hikmah Relief

Hikmah relief is a non-profit corporation and operates exclusively for educational, humanitarian, and charitable purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)3 of the internal revenue code, or the corresponding section of any future…

Education
12
Saaf Paani

Providing clean water to poor people living in Pakistan.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Palestinian Appeal Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cambodian Islamic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Christian Missionary Organi…Muslim Community Organizati…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Jewish Community FederationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Senior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%9%<5yr13%27%5–10yr18%18%10–20yr15%27%20–35yr14%15%35–55yr22%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%4%<5yr13%30%5–10yr18%13%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr22%1%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,323

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PIOUS PROJECTS — $1,739,740 · OtherPIOUS PROJECTS+16 more — $248,527 · Other+16 moreUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC — $193,441 · InternationalUNITED PALEST…PENNY APPEAL USA INC — $57,115 · InternationalPENNY APPEAL …THE JERUSALEM FUND FOR EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $42,865 · InternationalTHE JERUSALEM…YEMEN AID INC — $41,088 · InternationalYEMEN AID INC+6 more — $21,831 · International+6 moreHIDAYA FOUNDATION — $80,600 · PhilanthropyBANGLADESH AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MUSLIM AID FOR HUMA — $68,238 · PhilanthropyORPHANS IN NEED USA — $49,185 · PhilanthropyAMOUD FOUNDATION — $15,460 · PhilanthropyKhan Ohana Foundation — $57,115 · Human ServicesMATW PROJECT USA — $32,612 · Human ServicesSURAYYA ANNE FOUNDATION INC — $27,354 · Human ServicesZAMAN INTERNATIONAL — $13,090 · Human ServicesIndian Muslim Relief and Charities — $12,165 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $7,457 · Human ServicesUNITED HANDS — $86,469 · EducationCAMBODIAN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Education+2 more — $2,573 · EducationMuslim Community Center of Charlotte — $29,538 · ReligionOKLAHOMA ISLAMIC ACADEMY LLC — $15,035 · ReligionJUSTICE FOR ALL — $29,331 · Civil RightsCAIR-FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Civil RightsMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $17,311 · Food & NutritionMUSLIMS GIVING BACK INC — $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,988,267International$356,340Philanthropy$213,483Human Services$149,793Education$94,042Religion$44,573Civil Rights$31,331Food & Nutrition$20,311

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC — $193,441 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED HANDS — $86,469 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetHIDAYA FOUNDATION — $80,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBANGLADESH AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MUSLIM AID FOR HUMA — $68,238 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPENNY APPEAL USA INC — $57,115 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetKhan Ohana Foundation — $57,115 over 5y, 19% of budgetORPHANS IN NEED USA — $49,185 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JERUSALEM FUND FOR EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $42,865 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetYEMEN AID INC — $41,088 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADC RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $35,245 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetMuslim Community Center of Charlotte — $29,538 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetJUSTICE FOR ALL — $29,331 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSURAYYA ANNE FOUNDATION INC — $27,354 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $17,311 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA ISLAMIC ACADEMY LLC — $15,035 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetZAMAN INTERNATIONAL — $13,090 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIndian Muslim Relief and Charities — $12,165 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT RITA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $7,457 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBODIAN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetMUSLIMS GIVING BACK INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC — $2,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYAN — $523 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC
  • Who funds UNITED HANDS
  • Who funds HIDAYA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BANGLADESH AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MUSLIM AID FOR HUMA
  • Who funds PENNY APPEAL USA INC
  • Who funds Khan Ohana Foundation
  • Who funds ORPHANS IN NEED USA
  • Who funds THE JERUSALEM FUND FOR EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds YEMEN AID INC
  • Who funds ADC RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds MATW PROJECT USA
  • Who funds Muslim Community Center of Charlotte
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR ALL
  • Who funds SURAYYA ANNE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc
  • Who funds AMOUD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA ISLAMIC ACADEMY LLC
  • Who funds ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds Indian Muslim Relief and Charities
  • Who funds SAINT RITA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds BAITULMAAL INC
  • Who funds CAMBODIAN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MUSLIMS GIVING BACK INC
  • Who funds HUMANITY INCREASED
  • Who funds HUMAN APPEAL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Muslim Community FoundationCA23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Amin & Rubina Chikhalia Foundation · Darul Sadaqa786 · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Noor Munshi Foundation · Arab Community Center for Economic and S · Islamic Relief USA · Ge Aerospace Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sous Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph