Skip to content
Sourcepoint at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Sourcepoint

The mission of SOURCEPOINT is to help our community set a course to live well after 55.

$430k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.3MEmployment$1.7MHuman Services$848kCrime & Legal$55kEducation$40kAnimals$36kArts & Culture$32kHousing & Shelter$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $307k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $84k
$14,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DELAWARE SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER$84,000
HELPLINE OF DELAWARE & MORROW COUNTIES INC-CONNECTIONS$49,500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO$47,000
HELPLINE OF DELAWARE & MORROW COUNTIES INC-SENIOR COMPANION$41,250
GRACE CLINIC$35,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR MENTAL ILLNESS (NAMI) DELAWARE AND MORROW COUNTIES$25,000
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES (SR COMP)$24,000
OHIOHEALTH FOUNDATION DRIVE PROGRAM$23,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES$18,000
COMMON GROUND FREE STORE$14,300
CENTRAL OHIO AREA AGENCY ON AGING$10,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF DELAWARE COUNTY$10,000
DELAWARE GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES BOARD$7,500
OHIO WESLEYAN- LIFELONG LEARNING$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $576k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%United Church Homes: $8k → 17%United Church Homes: $6k → 17%Catholic Social Services: $37k → 15%Catholic Social Services: $35k → 15%Catholic Social Services: $35k → 15%Catholic Social Services: $30k → 15%Catholic Social Services: $30k → 15%Catholic Social Services: $24k → 15%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES (SR COMP): $24k → 15%People in Need: $30k → 5%People in Need: $26k → 5%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR MENTAL ILLNESS (NAMI) DELAWARE AND MORROW COUNTIES: $25k → 5%NAMI Delaware & Morrow counties: $25k → 5%NAMI Delaware & Morrow counties: $25k → 5%People in Need: $22k → 5%People in Need: $21k → 5%People in Need: $20k → 5%People in Need: $20k → 5%NAMI Delaware & Morrow counties: $20k → 5%NAMI Delaware & Morrow counties: $20k → 5%COMMON GROUND FREE STORE: $14k → 5%Common Ground Free Store: $14k → 5%People in Need: $14k → 5%Common Ground Free Store: $13k → 5%Common Ground Free Store: $10k → 5%Common Ground Free Store: $10k → 5%Common Ground Free Store: $10k → 5%Common Ground Free Store: $7k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 20 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$4.9M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+85%

Still filing today

85%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HELPLINE OF DELAWARE AND MORROW COUNTIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $706k · revenue +122%
  • DS
    Delaware Speech and Hearing Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $667k · revenue +11%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $392k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CS
    CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES - SENIOR COMPANION
    one grant, 2017 · $55k
  • MS
    MAIN STREET DELAWARE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -42%
  • TL
    THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF COLUMBUSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +85%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

—
2
Legal Services Corp of Delaware

Provision of legal services.

Crime & Legal
3
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
4
Delaware Center for Justice

The delaware center for justice, inc. seeks to ensure an effective, efficient, and equitable system of justice in delaware through advocacy, direct services, research and public education.

Crime & Legal
5
Lutheran Senior Services of Dover Inc

Provide safe, secure housing for eligible persons of limited income in an atmosphere of peace and dignity, with a sense of reponsible community and to provide such support services from management, staff and volunteers.

Human Services
6
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
7
United Church Residences of Delaware

To Provide Safe and Affordable Housing for Low-Income Persons.

—
8
Family and Community Service of Delaware County Inc

Family & community service of delaware county (fcsdc) is a private, nonprofit, multi-service organization. our services include outpatient mental health counseling for adults, adolescents, and children; medical case management for…

Human Services
9
Catholic Charities Corporation

Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.

Human Services
10
Handson Central Ohio Inc

To align community resources and generate insights that strengthen central ohio.

—
11
Delaware Center for Health Innovation Inc

The organization develops, facilitates, and oversees the implementation of collaborative efforts aimed at transforming the delivery of health care services in delaware.

—
12
Aids Delaware Inc

To eliminate the spread and stigma of hiv/aids, improve the lives of those living with hiv/aids, and promote community health through comprehensive and culturally-sensitive services, education programs and advocacy.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Willow Brook Christian Communities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Delaware Area Transit Agency: $1,709,464 · OtherDelaware Area Transit AgencyDelaware Speech and Hearing Center: $666,563 · OtherDelaware Speech and Hearing CenterOHIOHEALTH CORPORATION: $183,859 · OtherOHIOHEALTH CORPORATIONLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO: $118,324 · Other+8 more: $222,879 · Other+8 moreHELPLINE OF DELAWARE AND MORROW COUNTIES: $706,141 · HealthHELPLINE OF DELAWARE AND MORROW…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $392,494 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED D…GRACE CLINICS OF OHIO INC: $248,169 · HealthGRACE CLINICS OF OHIO INC+1 more: $32,700 · HealthCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $214,647 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC SOCI…PEOPLE IN NEED INC OF DELAWARE COUNTY OHIO: $153,535 · Human ServicesPEOPLE IN NEE…NAMI MID-OHIO: $114,750 · Human ServicesNAMI MID-OHIOCOMMON GROUND FREE STORE: $78,600 · Human ServicesCOMMON GROUND…+1 more: $14,203 · Human ServicesOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $39,588 · EducationTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF DELAWARE COUNTY: $35,614 · AnimalsVOICECORPS READING SERVICES INC: $31,565 · Arts & CultureSECOND WARD COMMUNITY INITIATIVE: $16,000 · Recreation & SportsMAIN STREET DELAWARE INC: $7,500 · Community Improvement
Other$2,901,089Health$1,379,504Human Services$575,735Education$39,588Animals$35,614Arts & Culture$31,565Recreation & Sports$16,000Community Improvement$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHELPLINE OF DELAWARE AND MORROW COUNTIES: $706,141 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetDelaware Speech and Hearing Center: $666,563 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $392,494 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE CLINICS OF OHIO INC: $248,169 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $214,647 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetPEOPLE IN NEED INC OF DELAWARE COUNTY OHIO: $153,535 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO: $118,324 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI MID-OHIO: $114,750 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetCOMMON GROUND FREE STORE: $78,600 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetWILLOW BROOK CHRISTIAN COMMUNITIES: $41,288 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $39,588 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF DELAWARE COUNTY: $35,614 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY CENTRAL OHIO: $32,700 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetVOICECORPS READING SERVICES INC: $31,565 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetMATUREWORKS INC: $16,728 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetSECOND WARD COMMUNITY INITIATIVE: $16,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetUNITED CHURCH HOMES INC: $14,203 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET DELAWARE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF COLUMBUS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HELPLINE OF DELAWARE AND MORROW COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds Delaware Speech and Hearing Center ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CLINICS OF OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE IN NEED INC OF DELAWARE COUNTY OHIO ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds NAMI MID-OHIO ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND FREE STORE ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW BROOK CHRISTIAN COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF DELAWARE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds VOICECORPS READING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MATUREWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND WARD COMMUNITY INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CHURCH HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF COLUMBUS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationDelaware County Found…Harry C Moores Founda…United Way of Delawar…United Way of Central…Cardinal Health Found…American Electric Pow…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Verizon FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…
Columbus FoundationOH31.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Delaware County Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · United Way of Delaware County · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Cardinal Health Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sourcepoint funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sourcepoint. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sourcepoint’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home