Skip to content
Soroptimist International of Anacortes at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Soroptimist International of Anacortes

SIA strives to advance human rights and the advancement of women by funding various community projects and awarding scholarships and awards.

$279k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$61kYouth Development$38kHousing & Shelter$32kHuman Services$24kInternational$16kRecreation & Sports$16kFood & Nutrition$11kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $49,448, the rows itemized in this filing. The $279,419 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $229,971 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Island Health Foundation$16,448
Skagit Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Center$7,000
Sunflower FUND$5,500
Skagit Valley YMCA$5,500
Food To Go$5,000
Anacortes Middle School$5,000
STEPS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%STEPS: $5k → 7%Skagit Domestic Violence of Mount Vernon: $7k → 11%Skagit Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Center: $7k → 11%Skagit Valley YMCA: $6k → 11%Community Action of Skagit Count: $5k → 11%CCS Farmworker Center: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$79k · 4 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$79k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+21%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ANACORTES FAMILY CENTER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $32k · revenue -22%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Skagit Valley
    2× · 2021–2022 · $18k
  • SF
    Sunflower Fund
    2× · 2024–2025 · $16k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • ST
    SOROPTIMIST THRIFT SHOP OF ANACORTES
    one grant, 2023 · $34k · revenue +18%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • AP
    ANACORTES PARKS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +116%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
2
The Skagit Community Foundation

To connect people who care with causes that matter.

Philanthropy
3
United Way of Skagit County

United Way of Skagit County's mission is to build a positive and sustainable quality of life for all.

Philanthropy
4
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
5
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
6
Sustainable Path Foundation

Sustainable Path Foundation promotes sustainability and health in the Puget Sound region through collaborative approaches informed by scientific understanding and systems thinking.

Social Science
7
Spokane Parks Foundation

The Spokane Parks Foundation cultivates the health, growth, and continued enjoyment of our communities by inspiring giving and passion for our parks.

—
8
Kitsap Community Foundation

: a catalyst for the greater good. we partner with donors and others to invest in our region's nonprofit organizations to foster a more vibrant kitsap peninsula for the benefit of all.

Philanthropy
9
Kodiak Womens Resource and Cri Center

Provide support services to persons in crisis as a result of domestic violence or sexual assault. Maintain a shelter building.

Human Services
10
The Sophia Way

The sophia way is a place of hope and change for women. we support them on their journey from homelessness to safe and stable living.

Human Services
11
Soroptimist International of Anacortes

SIA strives to advance human rights and the advancement of women by funding various community projects and awarding scholarships and awards. All programs are funded by donations made to our club.

Crime & Legal
12
Skagit Habitat for Humanity

The organization partners with hard working people in need of affordable housing, by building and renovating houses in an effort to develop permanent, affordable homes for low income families within Skagit County. We also provide volunteer…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action of Skagit County; the most unlike its peers is Steps. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOROPTIMIST THRIFT SHOP OF ANACORTES: $34,000 · OtherSOROPTIMIST THRIFT SHOP OF ANACORTESBoys & Girls Club of Skagit Valley: $17,500 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of Skagit ValleyISLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $16,448 · OtherISLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONANACORTES MIDDLE SCHOOL PTSA: $5,000 · OtherANACORTES MIDDLE SCHOOL PTSAWESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherWESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHSKAGIT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $14,157 · Human ServicesSKAGIT DOMESTIC VI…The Skagit Valley Family YMCA: $5,500 · Human ServicesThe Skagit Valley …STEPS: $5,000 · Human ServicesSTEPSCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION O…CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $5,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC COMMUNITY…ANACORTES FAMILY CENTER: $32,000 · Housing & ShelterANACORTES FAMILY …Sunflower Fund: $15,800 · InternationalSunflower F…THE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE: $6,000 · InternationalTHE SALVATI…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIR…ANACORTES PARKS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSKAGIT HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF WPC NEPAL: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$77,948Human Services$34,657Housing & Shelter$32,000International$21,800Youth Development$20,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Health$6,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOROPTIMIST THRIFT SHOP OF ANACORTES: $34,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetANACORTES FAMILY CENTER: $32,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSunflower Fund: $15,800 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetSKAGIT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $14,157 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetANACORTES PARKS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetSKAGIT HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Skagit Valley Family YMCA: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF WPC NEPAL: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Skagit Community …Puget Sound Energy Fo…Shell USA Company Fou…Medina FoundationKiwanis Club of Anaco…United Way of Skagit …Jerry H Walton Founda…The Norcliffe Foundat…Jeff and Linda Hendri…Milton & Miriam Waldb…NW Childrens Foundati…Bnsf Railway Foundati…
The Skagit Community FoundationWA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Skagit Community Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Medina Foundation · Kiwanis Club of Anacortes Wa Foundation · United Way of Skagit County · Jerry H Walton Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Jeff and Linda Hendricks Family Foundation · Milton & Miriam Waldbaum Family Foundation · NW Childrens Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Soroptimist International of Anacortes funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Soroptimist International of Anacortes. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Soroptimist International of Anacortes?

    Find your warmest path to Soroptimist International of Anacortes through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Soroptimist International of Anacortes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home