Skip to content

· Private foundation

Solomon Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$291kPhilanthropy$22kEducation$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kHuman Services$8kAnimals$8kInternational$6kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$52,941
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS$52,941
WEST SUBURBAN TEMPLE$9,036
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MIRA FOUNDATION USA: $6k → 10%SHALVA: $1k → 14%SHALVA: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
VA
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$534k · 11 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$534k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+17%

Still filing today

55%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthPublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    5× · 2017–2021 · $14k · revenue +13%
  • IU
    ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $7k · revenue +65%
  • GM
    GOTTLIEB MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • MF
    Mira Foundation USA Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +66%
  • IG
    IRC GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
3
Friends of United Hatzalah Inc

Friends of united hatzalah, inc .(fouh) raises and provides funding to not-for-profit organizations that provide medical and trauma-related first responder services in israel and around the world. fouh focuses the majority of its support…

Arts & Culture
4
World Jewish Relief Usa Inc

World jewish relief usa inc supports life-saving and life-changing action to assist and empower people in crisis around the world.

Religion
5
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
6
American Friends of Migdal Ohr

Migdal Ohr means "tower of light" in Hebrew and serves as a beacon of hope to thousands of orphaned and neglected children. We serve over 10,000 children every year and raise them to become thriving, successful adults. Migdal Ohr gives…

Youth Development
7
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
8
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
9
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
10
University of Judaism Foundation
—
11
Jewish Relief Network Ukraine

During the past year we provided humanitarian aid to more than 50,000 people in communities across Ukraine. We provided food, medicine, medical care, programs for children, lodging, counseling and much more. These efforts were carried out…

International
12
Israeli-American Council

The organization's mission is to build an engaged and united israeli-american community that strengthens the israeli and jewish identity of our next generation, the american-jewish community and the bond between the peoples of the united…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The 100 Club of Illinois; the most unlike its peers is World Wildlife Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST SUBURBAN TEMPLE: $288,011 · OtherWEST SUBURBAN TEMPLEVARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS: $157,201 · OtherVARIOUS SMALL DONATIONSVARIOUS SMALL DOANTIONS: $39,459 · OtherVARIOUS SMALL DOANTIONS+12 more: $45,350 · Other+12 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $14,300 · PhilanthropyUNITED CHARITABLE: $4,000 · PhilanthropyMira Foundation USA Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesSHALVA INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $7,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGOTTLIEB MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $3,500 · HealthWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentAnimal Aid Unlimited: $2,500 · Animals
Other$530,021Philanthropy$18,300Human Services$8,000Public Safety & Disaster$7,000Health$3,500Environment$2,500Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $14,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMira Foundation USA Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetUNITED CHARITABLE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOTTLIEB MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Aid Unlimited: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHALVA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mira Foundation USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CHARITABLE ↗
  • Who funds GOTTLIEB MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Animal Aid Unlimited ↗
  • Who funds THE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Solomon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Solomon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Solomon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph