Skip to content

· Private foundation

Solid Rock Foundation for Children

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$953kReligion$118kInternational$115kHousing & Shelter$21kHealth$15kYouth Development$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY OVERSEAS CHILD PROGRAM$50,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF WEST SACRAMENTS (GRACE CHILDREN'S HOME MINISTRIES)$30,000
SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION$11,465
FRIENDS OF PRADO 40$10,000
ANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA$5,000
FAR REACHING MINISTRIES$5,000
FREEDOM 4 YOUTH$5,000
FIGHTING BACK SANTA MARIA VALLEY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$1.1M
$3k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterInternationalEnvironmentReligionHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FR
    Far Reaching Ministries
    9× · 2017–2025 · $76k · revenue +70%
  • FB
    FIGHTING BACK SANTA MARIA VALLEY
    3× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +180%
  • BT
    Bridges to the Nations
    3× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SA
    Salvation Army - Santa Maria Corp
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rescue Mission Alliance

The rescue mission alliance's primary purpose is to establish and operate rescue missions to reach the less fortunate with the gospel of jesus christ and to assist in the feeding, clothing, and lodging of those who are destitute or…

Human Services
2
Good News Rescue Mission

To bring Good News to the poor, homeless, or needy of Shasta County by sharing the love of God exemplified by the life and ministry of Jesus Christ, providing emergency subsistence services, and providing long term recovery services.

Human Services
3
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
4
Domestic Violence Solutions for Santa Barbara County

Domestic violence solutions of santa barbara county is dedicated to providing safe harbor to all victims of domestic violence and their children throughout santa barbara county.

Human Services
5
Impact Ministry Socal

Impact Ministry is dedicated to supporting marginalized individuals as they successfully transition into society, with a focus on lifestyle changes, education, and a strong spiritual foundation.

Human Services
6
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
7
Long Beach Rescue Mission

Provide temporary housing, clothing, counseling services, food and financial assistance for homeless individuals.

Housing & Shelter
8
Transition House

Transition House is dedicated to the solution of family homelessness in the Santa Barbara community. Capable and motivated families with children are offered life tools and respectful, non-sectarian residential services designed to…

Housing & Shelter
9
Baja Bound Ministries Fka National Youth Innovations Inc

Baja bound ministries seeks to deliver the gospel through the construction of homes among the working poor and through creative and engaging ministry and food programs for the children in these communities.

Religion
10
Oxnard Homeless Prevntion
Human Services
11
Pathway Family Services Inc

None

Human Services
12
Fellowship Southwest

Fellowship Southwest is an ecumenical regional network of Christians and partner ministries promoting compassion, justice and connection throughout the Southwest US. Our ministry includes a network of pastors serving migrants on both sides…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fighting Back Santa Maria Valley; the most unlike its peers is Bridges to the Nations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $560,438 · OtherSALVATION ARMYGRACE CHILDREN'S HOME MINISTRIES: $335,000 · OtherGRACE CHILDREN'S HOME MINISTRIESLifewater International: $60,000 · OtherLifewater InternationalSALVATION ARMY OVERSEAS CHILD PROGRAM: $50,000 · Other+2 more: $33,000 · OtherFar Reaching Ministries: $75,886 · InternationalLIFEWATER INC: $55,000 · EnvironmentSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $11,465 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDS OF 40PRADO: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterFIGHTING BACK SANTA MARIA VALLEY: $15,000 · HealthBridges to the Nations: $12,000 · ReligionANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA: $5,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM 4 YOUTH: $5,000 · Education
Other$1,038,438International$75,886Environment$55,000Housing & Shelter$21,465Health$15,000Religion$12,000Human Services$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFar Reaching Ministries: $75,886 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLIFEWATER INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFIGHTING BACK SANTA MARIA VALLEY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBridges to the Nations: $12,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $11,465 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF 40PRADO: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFREEDOM 4 YOUTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Far Reaching Ministries ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWATER INC ↗
  • Who funds FIGHTING BACK SANTA MARIA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Bridges to the Nations ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF 40PRADO ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM 4 YOUTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Solid Rock Foundation for Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Solid Rock Foundation for Children. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Solid Rock Foundation for Children?

    Find your warmest path to Solid Rock Foundation for Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Solid Rock Foundation for Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph