· Private foundation
Sogamott Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION | $22,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATIO | $11,000 |
| NORTHSIDE METHODIST CHURCH | $8,200 |
| ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN | $3,000 |
| SKYLAND TRAIL | $2,000 |
| FIRST TEE OF ATLANTA | $2,000 |
| ASCENSA HEALTH | $2,000 |
| NATIONAL FOOTBALL FOUNDATION | $1,200 |
| ATLANTA MISSION | $1,000 |
| LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA | $1,000 |
| GREATER YELLOWSTON COALITION | $1,000 |
| MERCY CHEFS | $1,000 |
| ST JUDE'S RECOVERY CENTER | $750 |
| CHRIST THE KING SCHOOL | $625 |
| CHRIST THE KING | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $156k · revenue +112%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +57%
- AHASCENSA HEALTH INC6× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- TATHE ATLANTA OPERA INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +201%
- ADALPHA DELTA HOUSEone grant, 2023 · $3k
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSEone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
The mission of piedmont athens regional medical center is to improve the lives and health of those we touch.
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…
To partner with patients and communities to support wellness through compassionate, quality healthcare.
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Empowering georgia physicians to lead healthcare for the betterment of our communities.to be the collective voice of physicians while making georgia the best place to practice medicine in the united states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASCENSA HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCHENCK SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Good Golfers Better People of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTA OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN RETREAT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EAST TENNESSEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds PHI MU FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARCHBOLD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEENA MAGOWITZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY CHEFS INC ↗
- Who funds ROAD SAFE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BROOKWOOD SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHEROKEE CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Thalia & Michael C Carlos Foundation In · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · Hertz Douglas J Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sogamott Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sogamott Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Sogamott Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.