Skip to content
Society of Toxicology at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Society of Toxicology

To promote the acquisition and utilization of knowledge in toxicology and to facilitate the exchange of information among its members as well as among investigators of other scientific disciplines.

$623k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$752kHealth$365kScience & Tech$220kYouth Development$190kFood & Nutrition$15k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $138,827, the rows itemized in this filing. The $622,656 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $483,829 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
$12,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE$33,000
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ$12,494
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY$12,333
KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC$12,000
KING UNIVERSITY$12,000
THE TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY$12,000
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL$11,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$10,000
NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA$8,000
STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BROAD INSTITUTE INC: $15k → 8%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL INC: $44k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $9k → 9%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $15k → 11%TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER: $15k → 20%TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH: $15k → 22%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $52k → 16%KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $12k → 16%KING UNIVERSITY: $12k → 15%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $33k → 17%SCITOVATION LLC: $33k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $12k → 7%THE TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON: $40k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $10k → 9%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ: $53k → 8%INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY: $15k → 6%SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AND A&M COLLEGE: $10k → 19%NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES: $33k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $44k → 19%BETH ISRAEL DEACONNES MEDICAL CENTER INC: $40k → 16%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $15k → 22%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $19k → 16%KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $9k → 16%KING UNIVERSITY: $11k → 15%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11k → 17%RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL: $44k → 11%GORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES: $15k → 7%THE TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 19%RUTGERS STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ: $48k → 8%INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY: $12k → 6%NAT'L CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES: $11k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40k → 19%KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $11k → 22%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 16%KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $9k → 16%RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL: $11k → 11%GORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES: $12k → 7%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ: $15k → 8%INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY: $12k → 6%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40k → 19%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 16%KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $9k → 16%GORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES: $11k → 7%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ: $10k → 8%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%GORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES: $11k → 7%INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY: $9k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
NJ
RI
CA
KY
VA
MD
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 22 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
14

Total granted

$1.2M
$300k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+27%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2022 · $124k · revenue +25%
  • IU
    INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY INCORPORATED
    8× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +83%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $71k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $44k
  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +47%
  • UO
    University of Daytongraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
7
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
11
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
12
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $190,389 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITYMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $128,996 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $93,800 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $56,900 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANAMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $44,000 · OtherNIHNIA: $44,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $40,000 · OtherHHS US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION: $35,900 · OtherScitoVation LLC: $33,000 · OtherOregon Health & Science University: $30,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH: $30,000 · Other+13 more: $170,962 · Other+13 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $124,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVE…KING UNIVERSITY: $45,750 · EducationKING UNIVERSITYUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation: $43,000 · EducationUniversity of Louis…University of Dayton: $40,000 · EducationUniversity of Dayto…The Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $16,000 · EducationThe Research Founda…INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY INCORPORATED: $78,250 · HealthINTERNATIONAL UNIO…UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $71,150 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF KANS…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $44,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S…BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $40,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACON…The Broad Institute Inc: $15,000 · HealthThe Broad Institut…GORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC: $55,900 · Science & TechGORDON RE…Research Triangle Institute: $55,000 · Science & TechResearch …AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY: $10,000 · Science & TechAMERICAN …TOXICOLOGY EXCELLENCE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT: $6,079 · Science & Tech
Other$897,947Education$268,750Health$248,400Science & Tech$126,979

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $124,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY INCORPORATED: $78,250 over 8y, 14% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $71,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC: $55,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKING UNIVERSITY: $45,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $44,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation: $43,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAgricultural Research Foundation: $12,756 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOXICOLOGY EXCELLENCE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT: $6,079 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
  • Who funds KING UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Louisville Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Agricultural Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds TOXICOLOGY EXCELLENCE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johns Hopkins Univers…American Heart Associ…Cystic Fibrosis Found…Muscular Dystrophy As…Cornell UniversityPresident and Fellows…Washington UniversityUniversity of Pittsbu…National Collegiate A…Folds of Honor Founda…Fidelity Investments …
Johns Hopkins UniversityMD14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins University · American Heart Association Inc · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc · Cornell University · President and Fellows of Harvard College · Washington University · University of Pittsburgh · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Society of Toxicology funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Society of Toxicology. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Society of Toxicology’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home