How much did SOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of SOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

sciencesresearch

2020

research

2021

—

2022

—

2023

case studyrisk assessmentresearch

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k8 grants · $58k
$10k–50k6 grants · $74k

$9,000

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER$15,000
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ$14,808
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$12,200
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY$11,834
KING UNIVERSITY$10,500
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$10,000
KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC$9,000
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA$8,500
THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY$8,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR TOXICOLOGY RESEARCH$7,600
GORDON RESERCH CONFERENCES$7,500
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$6,196
TOXICOLOGY EXCELLENCE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT$6,079
THE PROGRAM EVALUATION GROUP LLC$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 66% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$738k · 14 repeat orgs$317k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$738k

$296k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%

+48%

Still filing today

50%

36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHealthScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
3× · 2019–2022 · $124k · revenue +45%
KR
KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
6× · 2018–2023 · $51k · revenue +54%
IU
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY
5× · 2018–2023 · $49k · revenue +83%

Funded once

BA
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL INC
one grant, 2020 · $44k
BI
BETH ISRAEL DEACONNES MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +64%
UO
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON
one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

National Council of University Research

To serve all members by advancing expertise in the profession of research administration.

—

Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

To improve the wellness of all people through innovative, interprofessional education of health and biomedical professionals and the discovery and implementation of knowledge.

—

Society of Toxicology

Create a safer & healthier world by advancing the science and increasing the impact of toxicology

—

University of New Orleans Research and

To support any and all programs, facilities, research, and educational opportunities offered by the University of New Orleans and the University of Louisiana System.

Health

Institute for Biomedical Sciences

Research and development with goal of defining a microvascular index for non-invasive monitoring of vascular health and for early diagnosis of vascular related diseases. stem cell differentiation study to optimize selection of scaffolds,…

Health

New York Academy of Sciences

To advance scientific knowledge and to increase the number of scientifically informed individuals.

—

Indiana University Research & Technology

The indiana university research and technology corporation (iurtc) serves indiana university, the state of indiana, and the nation through creation and application of the university developed technologies and services, and the expanded…

Education

Frontiers in Bioscience

Frontiers in bioscience ia an organizatioj dedicated to fostering science, research and teaching. fbs has been invo;ve in these activities since jan. 1 1996. fbs has published ober 4000 scholarly scientific articles in medicine and biology…

Science & Tech

University of Kansas School of Medicine-

Patient care and research are offered to provide education to members and students and to offer quality care to individuals without regard to the patients ability to pay.

Human Services

Medical University of South Carolina

The medical university of south carolina foundation (the "foundation") was incorporated in july 1966 under the laws of south carolina as an educational, charitable, eleemosynary foundation to promote educational, research, clinical, and…

Health

Research Triangle Institute

Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated(see Sch O) to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 5,300 provides research and technical expertise…

Science & Tech

New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is American Society for Microbiology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

11/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$605,791Education$215,750Health$173,400Science & Tech$60,279

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

University of PittsburghPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: University of Pittsburgh · Johns Hopkins University · American Heart Association Inc · Muscular Dystrophy Association · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · Cornell University · President and Fellows of Harvard College · Washington University · Emory University · National Collegiate Athletic Association · The Nature Conservancy · Folds of Honor Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +83% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 222532651 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on INTERNATIONAL UNION OF TOXICOLOGY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Society of Toxicology?

Find your warmest path to Society of Toxicology through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Society of Toxicology?

More from the funding graph

SOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Society of Toxicology?

More from the funding graph