Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Social Venture Partners Boulder County Inc

To harness the collective power of nonprofits and philanthropic changemakers to accelerate community impact.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$73kEducation$48kEnvironment$41kHuman Services$37kFood & Nutrition$27kHealth$24kCivil Rights$11kOther$113k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$305k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMEN'S WILDERNESS INSTITUTE$12,000
RISE AGAINST SUICIDE$12,000
EL COMITE DE LONGMONT$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WOMEN'S WILDERNESS INSTITUTE: $14k → 12%WOMEN'S WILDERNESS INSTITUTE: $12k → 12%ATTENTION HOMES: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$351k · 10 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$351k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+210%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TEACHING PEACE INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $48k · revenue +11%
  • BC
    BOULDER COMMUNITY BROADCAST ASSOC INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $43k · revenue +62%
  • WILD BEAR NATURE CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $41k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • AI
    ATTENTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +133%
  • VF
    VOICES FOR CHILDREN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +210%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
2
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
3
Boulder County Arts Alliance Inc

Since 1966, BCAA acts as a catalyst to incubate, stimulate and sustain a thriving arts community in Boulder County. BCAA commits to championing policies and practices of cultural equity that empower a just, inclusive and equitable Boulder…

Arts & Culture
4
Boulder County Injured and Fallen Officer Foundation
Public Safety & Disaster
5
Colorado Child Advocacy Alliance

To support the missions of child advocacy centers in colorado to help children and their families heal from abuse and neglect via training, technical assistance, collaboration and strategic partnerships.

Crime & Legal
6
Child and Family Advocacy Program

Blue sky bridge is a child advocacy center dedicated to creating lasting positive change in the lives of children affected by abuse in boulder county and beyond. its vision is to be a beacon of strength, leadership, hope and resilience…

Crime & Legal
7
Colorado Lawyers Committee

To provide legal assistance and increase opportunities for children and other disadvantaged communities through advocacy, negotiation and litigation. Volunteer attorneys dedicate time to improve the quality of life for these causes while…

Crime & Legal
8
Boulder Carshare

To provide and promote alternatives to individual car ownership, thereby reducing the environmental and social impacts associated with motor vehicle use.

Environment
9
Colorado Access to Justice Commission

The mission of the colorado access to justice commission is to expand access, quality, and fairness in the justice system for all coloradans.

Crime & Legal
10
Womens Comm Leadership Initiative

WCLI empowers women in Colorado Springs to realize their full leadership potential, breakdown barriers to advancement, create a more inclusive and equitable community for all.

Employment
11
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
12
Colorado Council On Economic Education

Our mission is to empower colorado students to achieve a lifetime of economic understanding and financial freedom. how will we achieve this mission? by providing economic and personal financial education to students through training…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca Boulder County and the most unlike its peers is Rise Against Suicide. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC — $41,000 · OtherIMPACT ON EDUCATION INCYWCA BOULDER COUNTY — $38,000 · OtherYWCA BOULDER COUNTYEL COMITE DE LONGMONT — $34,000 · OtherEL COMITE DE LONGMONTBOULDER COMMUNITY BROADCAST ASSOC INC — $43,000 · Arts & CultureBOULDER COMMUNITY BROA…WOW CHILDREN'S MUSEUM WORLD OF WONDER — $29,500 · Arts & CultureWOW CHILDREN'S MUSEUM …TEACHING PEACE INC — $48,000 · EducationTEACHING PEACE…WILD BEAR NATURE CENTER — $41,000 · EnvironmentWILD BEAR NA…WOMEN'S WILDERNESS INSTITUTE — $25,500 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S WIL…ATTENTION INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesATTENTION I…COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $26,500 · Food & NutritionRise Against Suicide — $24,000 · HealthVOICES FOR CHILDREN INC — $11,000 · Civil Rights
Other$113,000Arts & Culture$72,500Education$48,000Environment$41,000Human Services$36,500Food & Nutrition$26,500Health$24,000Civil Rights$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEACHING PEACE INC — $48,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetBOULDER COMMUNITY BROADCAST ASSOC INC — $43,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWILD BEAR NATURE CENTER — $41,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetIMPACT ON EDUCATION INC — $41,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYWCA BOULDER COUNTY — $38,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetEL COMITE DE LONGMONT — $34,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetWOW CHILDREN'S MUSEUM WORLD OF WONDER — $29,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetWOMEN'S WILDERNESS INSTITUTE — $25,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetRise Against Suicide — $24,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetATTENTION INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN INC — $11,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Denver Foundation · AEC Trust · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Edmund T & Eleanor Quick Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Ray Lanyon Fund · Collins Foundation · Braly Family Foundation · Lynn & Helen N Clark Crt · Emsa Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Social Venture Partners Boulder County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph