Skip to content

· Public charity

Snowshoe Foundation Inc

The mission of the snowshoe foundation is to seek to enhance the quality of life in our local communities through assisting local organizaitons and/or individuals in areas of health, human services, education, recreation, the arts,

$378k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$540kRecreation & Sports$93kHealth$45kEnvironment$35kCommunity Improvement$35kFood & Nutrition$33kYouth Development$27kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $170,704, the rows itemized in this filing. The $377,655 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $206,951 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $131k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$230k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POCAHONTAS COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL$20,700
TYGART VALLEY MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOL$15,500
WEBSTER COUNTY 4-H LEADERS ASSOCIATION$15,000
ELKINS HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
DAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE$14,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY$11,000
TYGARTS VALLEY HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION$10,000
HILLSBORO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
COWEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$10,000
RANDOLPH COUNTY TECHNICAL CENTER$10,000
WEST VIRGINIA WOOD TECHNOLOGY CENTER$8,000
TYRAND COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES$7,500
POCAHONTAS COUNTY 4-H$7,500
MIDLAND ELEMENTARY$5,604
CHALLENGED ATHLETES OF WV$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $7k → 18%CHILD YOUTH AND ADVOCACY CENTER: $6k → 18%TYRAND COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $8k → 17%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $10k → 20%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$572k · 14 repeat orgs$321k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
25

Total granted

$572k
$265k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+3%

Still filing today

36%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterHealthEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DISABLED SPORTS USA-CHALLENGED ATHLETES OF WV
    4× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +38%
  • TV
    Tygart Valley Homestead Association Inc
    2× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • PC
    Pocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc
    2× · 2020–2023 · $16k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ELKINS ROTARY CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • TO
    TOWN OF MARLINTON
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • PG
    PHIL GAINER COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tyler County Family Resource Network Inc

To serve as the primary planning and coordinating body to promote

Human Services
2
Romney Volunteer Fire Company

Local volunteer fire department providing fire protection and rescue services to the citizens of romney wv and surrounding areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
4
Buckingham County Vol Fire Department Dba Dillwyn Fire Department

The purpose of the Buckingham County Vol. Fire Dept. is to provide fire protection to the citizens of Buckingham County and surrounding counties if needed. We also respond to automobile accidents as well as any other request for assistance.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Moorefield Volunteer Fire Company

Volunteer fire company providing fire protection and emergency rescue services to hardy county, wv

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Harman Volunteer Fire Department Inc

None

—
7
Grandview Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

Providing public fire protection and emergency rescue services.

—
8
Burnsville Volunteer Fire Department

Mission for burnsville vfd burnsville wv the burnsville vfd provides fire protection fire safety and emergency rescue services to the citizens in its designated area. bvfd serves in a safe efficient manner serving all stakeholders.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
East Roane County Volunteer Fire Dept

The department provides volunteer fire and EMS service to approximately 3800 residents (and those passing through on I-40) in East Roane County Tennessee.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Wilderness Volunteer Fire Department Inc

WVFD provides fire suppression and rescue services to the communities of Nicholas County, WV and surrounding areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Lewisburg Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Fire protection for the City of Lewisburg, WV and surrounding areas

—
12
Elkton Emergency Squad Inc

To provide emergency medical services to the citizens of Elkton, McGaheysville and Massanutten Village and the surrounding areas of Rockingham County. These services are provided by an all volunteer agency who responded to more than 3,000…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Refuge Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rotary International Elkins Rotary Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
9/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELKINS HIGH SCHOOL: $162,179 · OtherELKINS HIGH SCHOOLTYGART VALLEY MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOL: $84,000 · OtherTYGART VALLEY MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOLPOCAHONTAS COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $76,840 · OtherPOCAHONTAS COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLSTATE OF WEST VIRGINIA WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $38,100 · OtherLINWOOD ALIVE: $27,000 · OtherDISABLED SPORTS USA-CHALLENGED ATHLETES OF WV: $26,430 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA WOOD TECHNOLOGY CENTER: $25,500 · Other+26 more: $310,651 · Other+26 moreTygart Valley Homestead Association Inc: $20,000 · Community ImprovementPOCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $12,050 · Community ImprovementRandolph County Family Resource Network Inc: $10,000 · Community ImprovementPocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc: $16,000 · Human ServicesTyrand Cooperative Ministries Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesChild and Youth Advocacy Center: $6,000 · Human ServicesNATURES MOUNTAIN CLASSROOM: $20,000 · HealthCOWEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWebster Springs VFD Inc: $9,000 · Public Safety & DisasterDAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE: $14,000 · EducationMEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $11,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$750,700Community Improvement$42,050Human Services$36,000Health$20,000Public Safety & Disaster$19,000Education$14,000Food & Nutrition$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDISABLED SPORTS USA-CHALLENGED ATHLETES OF WV: $26,430 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetTygart Valley Homestead Association Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetPocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc: $16,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMOUNTAIN STATE FOREST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $15,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetDAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $12,050 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $11,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetCOWEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $9,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OLD BRICK PLAYHOUSE COMPANY: $7,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTyrand Cooperative Ministries Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetChild and Youth Advocacy Center: $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELKINS INC: $5,775 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTYGART VALLEY LIONS CLUB: $5,400 over 1y, 6.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DISABLED SPORTS USA-CHALLENGED ATHLETES OF WV ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ELKINS ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds NATURES MOUNTAIN CLASSROOM ↗
  • Who funds Tygart Valley Homestead Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds 4-H CLUBS ASSOCIATION OF WEBSTER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Pocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN STATE FOREST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds POCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COWEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT ↗
  • Who funds Randolph County Family Resource Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Webster Springs VFD Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE OLD BRICK PLAYHOUSE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Tyrand Cooperative Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Child and Youth Advocacy Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Greenbrier Valley IncWV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Buckhannon West Virginia · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Snowshoe Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Snowshoe Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Snowshoe Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Snowshoe Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Snowshoe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph