Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Snowshoe Foundation Inc

The mission of the snowshoe foundation is to seek to enhance the quality of life in our local communities through assisting local organizaitons and/or individuals in areas of health, human services, education, recreation, the arts,

$378k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$540kRecreation & Sports$93kHealth$45kEnvironment$35kCommunity Improvement$35kFood & Nutrition$33kYouth Development$27kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $170,704 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $377,655 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $206,951 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $131k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$230k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POCAHONTAS COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL$20,700
TYGART VALLEY MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOL$15,500
ELKINS HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
WEBSTER COUNTY 4-H LEADERS ASSOCIATION$15,000
DAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE$14,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY$11,000
RANDOLPH COUNTY TECHNICAL CENTER$10,000
COWEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$10,000
TYGARTS VALLEY HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION$10,000
HILLSBORO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
WEST VIRGINIA WOOD TECHNOLOGY CENTER$8,000
TYRAND COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES$7,500
POCAHONTAS COUNTY 4-H$7,500
MIDLAND ELEMENTARY$5,604
CHALLENGED ATHLETES OF WV$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $7k → 18%CHILD YOUTH AND ADVOCACY CENTER: $6k → 18%TYRAND COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $8k → 17%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $10k → 20%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$572k · 14 repeat orgs$321k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
25

Total granted

$572k
$265k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+3%

Still filing today

29%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DISABLED SPORTS USA-CHALLENGED ATHLETES OF WV
    4× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +38%
  • TV
    Tygart Valley Homestead Association Inc
    2× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • PC
    Pocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc
    2× · 2020–2023 · $16k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ELKINS ROTARY CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • TO
    TOWN OF MARLINTON
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • PG
    PHIL GAINER COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tyler County Family Resource Network Inc

To serve as the primary planning and coordinating body to promote

Human Services
2
Romney Volunteer Fire Company

Local volunteer fire department providing fire protection and rescue services to the citizens of romney wv and surrounding areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
4
Buckingham County Vol Fire Department Dba Dillwyn Fire Department

The purpose of the Buckingham County Vol. Fire Dept. is to provide fire protection to the citizens of Buckingham County and surrounding counties if needed. We also respond to automobile accidents as well as any other request for assistance.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Moorefield Volunteer Fire Company

Volunteer fire company providing fire protection and emergency rescue services to hardy county, wv

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Harman Volunteer Fire Department Inc

None

7
Grandview Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

Providing public fire protection and emergency rescue services.

8
Burnsville Volunteer Fire Department

Mission for burnsville vfd burnsville wv the burnsville vfd provides fire protection fire safety and emergency rescue services to the citizens in its designated area. bvfd serves in a safe efficient manner serving all stakeholders.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
East Roane County Volunteer Fire Dept

The department provides volunteer fire and EMS service to approximately 3800 residents (and those passing through on I-40) in East Roane County Tennessee.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Wilderness Volunteer Fire Department Inc

WVFD provides fire suppression and rescue services to the communities of Nicholas County, WV and surrounding areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Lewisburg Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Fire protection for the City of Lewisburg, WV and surrounding areas

12
Elkton Emergency Squad Inc

To provide emergency medical services to the citizens of Elkton, McGaheysville and Massanutten Village and the surrounding areas of Rockingham County. These services are provided by an all volunteer agency who responded to more than 3,000…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Refuge Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rotary International Elkins Rotary Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%10%<5yr11%10%5–10yr23%32%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr16%13%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%9%<5yr11%10%5–10yr23%32%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr16%17%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
7%
23/342

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ELKINS HIGH SCHOOL — $162,179 · OtherELKINS HIGH SCHOOLTYGART VALLEY MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOL — $84,000 · OtherTYGART VALLEY MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOLPOCAHONTAS COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL — $76,840 · OtherPOCAHONTAS COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLSTATE OF WEST VIRGINIA WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY — $38,100 · OtherLINWOOD ALIVE — $27,000 · OtherDISABLED SPORTS USA-CHALLENGED ATHLETES OF WV — $26,430 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA WOOD TECHNOLOGY CENTER — $25,500 · Other+25 more — $314,151 · Other+25 moreTygart Valley Homestead Association Inc — $20,000 · Community ImprovementPOCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK — $12,050 · Community ImprovementRandolph County Family Resource Network Inc — $10,000 · Community ImprovementPocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc — $16,000 · Human ServicesTyrand Cooperative Ministries Inc — $7,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC — $6,500 · Human ServicesChild and Youth Advocacy Center — $6,000 · Human ServicesCOWEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWebster Springs VFD Inc — $9,000 · Public Safety & DisasterDAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE — $14,000 · EducationMEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC — $11,000 · Food & NutritionTHE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION — $9,000 · EmploymentTHE OLD BRICK PLAYHOUSE COMPANY — $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$754,200Community Improvement$42,050Human Services$36,000Public Safety & Disaster$19,000Education$14,000Food & Nutrition$11,000Employment$9,000Arts & Culture$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDISABLED SPORTS USA-CHALLENGED ATHLETES OF WV — $26,430 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetTygart Valley Homestead Association Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetPocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc — $16,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMOUNTAIN STATE FOREST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC — $15,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetDAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK — $12,050 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC — $11,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetCOWEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION — $9,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OLD BRICK PLAYHOUSE COMPANY — $7,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTyrand Cooperative Ministries Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetChild and Youth Advocacy Center — $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELKINS INC — $5,775 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTYGART VALLEY LIONS CLUB — $5,400 over 1y, 6.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DISABLED SPORTS USA-CHALLENGED ATHLETES OF WV
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ELKINS ROTARY CLUB
  • Who funds Tygart Valley Homestead Association Inc
  • Who funds 4-H CLUBS ASSOCIATION OF WEBSTER COUNTY
  • Who funds Pocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN STATE FOREST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds DAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE
  • Who funds POCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds COWEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
  • Who funds Randolph County Family Resource Network Inc
  • Who funds THE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION
  • Who funds Webster Springs VFD Inc
  • Who funds THE OLD BRICK PLAYHOUSE COMPANY
  • Who funds Tyrand Cooperative Ministries Inc
  • Who funds FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC
  • Who funds Child and Youth Advocacy Center

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Greenbrier Valley IncWV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Buckhannon West Virginia · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Snowshoe Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Snowshoe Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Snowshoe Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph