Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sneed Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$176kHousing & Shelter$159kEducation$123kArts & Culture$80kYouth Development$75kFood & Nutrition$39kHuman Services$15kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$50,000
L'ARCHE JACKSONVILLE$28,000
THE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM$25,000
MARTIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$15,000
VISION CASHIERS INC$12,500
EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VISION CASHIERS INC: $13k → 18%VISION CASHIERS INC: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$571k · 10 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$571k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+31%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LJ
    L'ARCHE JACKSONVILLE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $159k · revenue +30%
  • MC
    MARTIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +75%
  • FL
    FISHES & LOAVES FOOD PANTRY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $29k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • B
    BEAM
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • FN
    FEEDING NORTHEAST FLORIDA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • HC
    Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charlotte Community Health Clinic Inc

Provide the highest quality, patient-centered health care services for low-income and other underserved individuals.

Health
2
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
3
First Choice Community Health Ctrs

Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.

Health
4
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
5
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
6
Virginia B Andes Volunteer Community Clinic Inc

Provide no-cost volunteer medical, pharmacy and wellness services to the under-served in charlotte county

Health
7
Township Seven Ems Inc

Provide emergency medical services to residents and businesses of township 7 and the surrounding areas of craven county, north carolina

Education
8
Chillicothe Ross Chamber of Commerce

To advance area businesses and facilitate action on local issues of concern.

—
9
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

—
10
Lake Superior Community Health Center

To improve access to quality health care for all.

Health
11
Granville Health Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to engage in charitable efforts and to support granville health system in providing healthcare and related services to the citizens and residents of granville county and the surrounding community.

Health
12
Sawtooth Mountain Clinic Inc

To provide access to high quality, comprehensive, primary healthcare in cook county to all users, regardless of financial ability to pay for service.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is L'arche Jacksonville Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDABROOKS HEALTH REHABILITATION: $90,000 · OtherBROOKS HEALTH REHABILITATIONTHE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM: $25,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUMBEAM: $10,000 · OtherFEEDING NORTHEAST FLORIDA: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $7,000 · OtherL'ARCHE JACKSONVILLE INC: $158,500 · Housing & ShelterL'ARCHE JACKSONVILLE INCBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc: $75,000 · EducationBoys & Girls Clu…MARTIN COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL: $21,600 · EducationMARTIN COUNTY VE…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationMAYO CLINIC: $50,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC: $26,000 · HealthBLUE RIDGE MOU…Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $10,000 · HealthHighlands Cash…MARTIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $55,000 · Arts & CultureMARTIN CO…FISHES & LOAVES FOOD PANTRY INC: $29,000 · Food & NutritionVISION CASHIERS INC: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$242,000Housing & Shelter$158,500Education$97,600Health$86,000Arts & Culture$55,000Food & Nutrition$29,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetL'ARCHE JACKSONVILLE INC: $158,500 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMARTIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $55,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetFISHES & LOAVES FOOD PANTRY INC: $29,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC: $26,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetMARTIN COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL: $21,600 over 3y, 23% of budgetVISION CASHIERS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGLENVILLE-CASHIERS RESCUE SQUAD INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSummit Charter School: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Leadership Legacy Life Foundation · The Double Eagle Foundation 4191-06-43 · Florence Mauboules Charitable Trust · The Marvin and Helene Gralnick Foundation Inc · Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc · Brighton Foundation Trust Robert D Markley Trustee · The Billi Marcus Foundation Inc · Redstone Summit Foundation · Tickle Family Foundation · Steven and Sheila Miller Foundation · Hindman Family Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sneed Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sneed Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sneed Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph