Skip to content

· Private foundation

Smith Family Foundation Fred M Smith Co-Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$405k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$463kReligion$362kHuman Services$163kHealth$141kPublic Safety & Disaster$121kArts & Culture$78kCrime & Legal$61kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $397k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER OF HOPE POLK COUNTY$40,000
WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS$30,000
POLK COUNTY CARES$24,700
SANCTUARY OF HOPE$15,500
SAAFE HOUSE$15,500
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF LIVINGSTON$15,000
BRIAN PERRY MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FD$11,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY$11,000
MENTAL HEALTH ADVANCEMENT FDN$11,000
ISERVE365$11,000
SPCA OF POLK COUNTY$11,000
POLK COUNTY COMMERCE CENTER$11,000
FAITH MILITARY SUPPORT GROUP$10,000
POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE$10,000
MAKING SPORTS POSSIBLE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $1k → 19%POLK COUNTY CARES: $25k → 18%POLK COUNTY CARES: $7k → 18%POLK COUNTY CARES: $6k → 18%POLK COUNTY CARES: $1k → 18%WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS: $30k → 19%HOUSE OF MARY: $10k → 19%WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS: $10k → 19%HOUSE OF MARY: $3k → 19%COMMUNITY ACTION: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 44 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
15

Total granted

$1.3M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+27%

Still filing today

20%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsEducationPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GRACE PREGNANCY OUTREACH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue +23%
  • WF
    WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +3%
  • SH
    SAAFE HOUSE
    5× · 2017–2024 · $39k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • BW
    BIBLE WAY CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • PC
    POLK COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY LIVINGSTON
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
2
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
3
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
4
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
5
Homeless Outreach Mitigation and Emergency Center

to reach functional zero homelessness in Hays County through outreach case management direct aid and emergency response while maintaining the dignity of the people we serve

Human Services
6
Atx Helps

ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
7
Pregnancy Care Center of Southeast Texas

Confidential pregnancy testing; counseling in pregnancy options; classes in prenatal care, parenting and job skills; referrals; providing baby items and clothing.

Health
8
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
9
The Lullaby House

The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.

Youth Development
10
Crisis Center of West Texas

Crisis center of west texas' mission is to respond, shelter, and educate to end domestic and sexual violence in west texas.

—
11
Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas

People of faith responding to needs by serving, teaching, building community and preserving the dignity of individuals and families in Southeast Texas.

Human Services
12
Mary House Catholic Worker of Austin 083198

Provides support to critically ill or physically impaired homeless and indigent individuals in Austin by providing food, shelter, clothing, and other forms of assistance. Also serves as advocate for imprisoned men and women.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Inc of Central Texas; the most unlike its peers is Livingston Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREEN & WHITE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $248,750 · OtherGREEN & WHITE SCHOLARSHIP FUNDCENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH: $101,000 · OtherCENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCHACTS TWO MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $72,000 · OtherACTS TWO MINISTRIES INTERNATIONALLIVINGSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST: $63,000 · OtherBIG SANDY INDEPEDENT SCHOOL DISTRIC: $60,000 · OtherPOLK COUNTY MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $49,448 · Other+51 more: $678,647 · Other+51 moreWHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS: $40,000 · Human ServicesPOLK COUNTY CARES: $38,100 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF MARY: $12,500 · Human Services+2 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesGRACE PREGNANCY OUTREACH: $50,000 · Civil RightsSAAFE HOUSE: $39,000 · Health+1 more: $1,056 · HealthLIVINGSTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $29,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCHILDRENZ HAVEN: $20,000 · Crime & LegalPOLK COUNTY AREA GO TEXAN COMMITTEE: $6,800 · Education
Other$1,272,845Human Services$93,100Civil Rights$50,000Health$40,056Public Safety & Disaster$29,000Crime & Legal$20,000Education$6,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE PREGNANCY OUTREACH: $50,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetWHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSAAFE HOUSE: $39,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetPOLK COUNTY CARES: $38,100 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetLIVINGSTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $29,000 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetCHILDRENZ HAVEN: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHOUSE OF MARY: $12,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetCentral Texas Hospitality House: $12,500 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetPOLK COUNTY AREA GO TEXAN COMMITTEE: $6,800 over 3y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,056 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRACE PREGNANCY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds SAAFE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds POLK COUNTY CARES ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENZ HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF MARY ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Hospitality House ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Smith Family Foundation Fred M Smith Co-Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Smith Family Foundation Fred M Smith Co-Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Smith Family Foundation Fred M Smith Co-Trustee?

Find your warmest path to Smith Family Foundation Fred M Smith Co-Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Smith Family Foundation Fred M Smith Co-Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph