Skip to content

· Private foundation

Smickley Family Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Laurie J Smickley

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MHousing & Shelter$692kAnimals$150kHealth$58kReligion$55kCommunity Improvement$36kHuman Services$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$9k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$124k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DORDT UNIVERSITY$100,000
THE MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION$100,000
THE POTTER'S HOUSE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$15,000
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES$10,000
PROMISE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$10,000
COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%KATELYN'S FUND ORPHAN MINISTRY INC: $5k → 8%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 9 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$1.9M
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+38%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DORDT UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +66%
  • GS
    GREATER SIOUX COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +115%
  • TP
    The Potters House
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION (CROSS TRAINERS ACADEMY)
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • CT
    CROSS TRAINERS ACADEMY (THE MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION)
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
  • KF
    KATELYNS FUND ORPHAN MINISTRY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

—
2
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
3
Presbyterian Children's Homes & Services

Presbyterian children's homes and services provides a variety of christ-centered care and support to children and families in need.

Human Services
4
Gospel Care Collective

Provide resources for global orphan care

Human Services
5
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
6
Harvesters International Ministries

Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community

Religion
7
Gospel to Haiti Inc

Gth is a christian missions organization that operates in haiti. the organization focuses on the many needs of the haitian people. it operates one clinic and supports schools.

International
8
Dakota Christian School

The mission of dakota christian school is to assist parents by providing education based on a biblical worldview, thereby enabling children to grow in christian wisdom, to nurture godly character, and to serve christ as lord.

Education
9
World Servants Inc

The mission of world servants is to display gods love to the world through church partnerships and gospel-centered service. the vision of world servants is connect churches in the usa to churches around the world with a shared goal of…

Community Improvement
10
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
11
GlobalServant Ministries Inc

Offers counsel, formal & informal teaching served in a pastoral role, mentored groups,filled numerous speaking invitations, conducted discipling groups & provided spiritual, emotional and

Religion
12
Midwest University

Christian institution of higher learning dedicated to the exploration, discernment, sustentation, and dissemination of god's truth. midwest is committed to excellence in education encouraging students to comprehensively consider god's word…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Other Way Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Greater Sioux Community Health Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DORDT UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 · EducationDORDT UNIVERSITYThe Potters House: $56,000 · EducationMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION: $685,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSIONTHE MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION (CROSS TRAINERS ACADEMY): $75,000 · OtherTHE MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION (CROSS TRAINERS ACAD…CROSS TRAINERS ACADEMY (THE MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION): $75,000 · OtherCROSS TRAINERS ACADEMY (THE MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISS…COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH+2 more: $22,000 · OtherGREATER SIOUX COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $58,000 · HealthPARTNERS WORLDWIDE: $36,000 · InternationalGOSERV GLOBAL INC: $9,000 · Public Safety & DisasterKATELYNS FUND ORPHAN MINISTRY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $2,000 · Human Services
Education$1,056,000Other$907,000Health$58,000International$36,000Public Safety & Disaster$9,000Human Services$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER SIOUX COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $58,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetThe Potters House: $56,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS WORLDWIDE: $36,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGOSERV GLOBAL INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKATELYNS FUND ORPHAN MINISTRY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER SIOUX COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Potters House ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds GOSERV GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds KATELYNS FUND ORPHAN MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Smickley Family Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Laurie J Smickley funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Smickley Family Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Laurie J Smickley. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Smickley Family Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Laurie J Smickley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph