Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Smart Growth America

SMART GROWTH AMERICA envisions a country where no matter where you live, or who you are, you can enjoy living in a place that is healthy, prosperous, and resilient. Our mission is to empower communities through technical assistance, advocacy, and thought leadership to realize our vision of livable places, healthy people, and shared…

$356k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$355,649
Largest grant, FY2023
$355,649
Organizations funded a year
1 to 18
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$8.7M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Smart Growth America funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyCivil RightsPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20231$356k0%
FY20222$298k0%
FY20215$239k80%
FY20203$247k0%
FY201918$826k56%
FY201815$769k87%
FY20178$283kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Community Improvement$1.0MCivil Rights$811kEnvironment$520kPublic Benefit$365kPhilanthropy$151kPublic Safety & Disaster$68kEducation$65kArts & Culture$48kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
CA
KY
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Greater Greater Washington$811,237639%
FUSE Corps$350,00023%
Capital E$345,4552n/a
Alliance for a Just Society$225,00023%
Integral Group Consulting LLC$184,9731n/a
Global Philanthropy Partnership$144,82121%
Conservation Law Foundation Inc$133,00040%
Multiplier$125,00020%
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce$82,50013%
Walksandiego$80,00023%
Show all 35 grantees
All grantees of Smart Growth America by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Greater Greater Washington$811,237639%
FUSE Corps$350,00023%
Capital E$345,4552n/a
Alliance for a Just Society$225,00023%
Integral Group Consulting LLC$184,9731n/a
Global Philanthropy Partnership$144,82121%
Conservation Law Foundation Inc$133,00040%
Multiplier$125,00020%
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce$82,50013%
Walksandiego$80,00023%
Conexion Americas$70,80012%
National League of Cities Institute Inc$69,93021%
Community Partners$55,00020%
Apano Communities United Fund$55,0001n/a
City of Dothan Alabama$50,0002n/a
Urban Sustainability Directors Network$44,82111%
Metropolitan Area Planning Council$25,0001n/a
Jefferson Street United Merchants Partnership CDC$21,6751n/a
Conservation Minnesota$14,00011%
St Paul Transportation Management Organization$13,33312%
City of Arlington$10,0001n/a
Wiregrass Museum of Art Inc$10,00012%
City of Wenatchee$10,0001n/a
Faith in Indiana$10,0001n/a
Kheprw Institute dba KI NuMedia CCFI$10,0001n/a
Oasis Center Inc$8,32510%
City of Orlando Fl$8,0001n/a
Lexington Pal$8,0001n/a
City of Durham$8,0001n/a
City of South Bend$8,0001n/a
City of Huntsville$8,0001n/a
City of Pittsburgh$8,0001n/a
Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce Charitable Foundation$6,00011%
City of Airway Heights$3,6931n/a
Gehlorg Inc dba Gehl Institute$1,00012%

Where it is load-bearing

Smart Growth America supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 18 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreater Greater Washington: $811,237 over 6y, 39% of budgetFUSE Corps: $350,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetAlliance for a Just Society: $225,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetGlobal Philanthropy Partnership: $144,821 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetConservation Law Foundation Inc: $133,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMultiplier: $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMinneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce: $82,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetWalksandiego: $80,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetConexion Americas: $70,800 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNational League of Cities Institute Inc: $69,930 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Partners: $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUrban Sustainability Directors Network: $44,821 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetConservation Minnesota: $14,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSt Paul Transportation Management Organization: $13,333 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWiregrass Museum of Art Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetOasis Center Inc: $8,325 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSaint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce Charitable Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGehlorg Inc dba Gehl Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Energy FoundationCA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Energy Foundation · National Recreation and Park Association · The McKnight Foundation · United States Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · AARP · The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inc · Surdna Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Smart Growth America with peer funders

About Smart Growth America

How much does Smart Growth America give?
Smart Growth America reported 1 grants totaling $355,649 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 18 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Smart Growth America fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Community Improvement (33%), Civil Rights (26%), Environment (17%).
Who are Smart Growth America's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Greater Greater Washington ($811k), FUSE Corps ($350k), Capital E ($345k).
Does Smart Growth America fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Smart Growth America?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Energy Foundation, National Recreation and Park Association, The McKnight Foundation.
Where is Smart Growth America based?
Smart Growth America is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Smart Growth America’s filings →

More from the funding graph