Skip to content

· Private foundation

Skylight Foundation Inc the Siegfried Group

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$712k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.3MArts & Culture$902kHealth$525kFood & Nutrition$125kAnimals$115kHuman Services$30kScience & Tech$25kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $137k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
  • $250k+1 grant · $325k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONGAVA RESEARCH CENTRE$325,000
OPERA PHILADELPHIA$150,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FAO THE BARNES FOUNDATION$100,000
ARTISTYEAR$37,500
THE PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA$25,000
ST BARTHOLOMEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$25,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FAO CULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA$25,000
TIGER TOP CULTURAL AND ADVENTURE TOURS PVT LTD$14,000
CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 81% of grant dollars ($2.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 19% that went abroad ($579k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 19% of all-years giving ($579k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Namibia$450k · 2 grants
United Kingdom$115k · 2 grants
India$14k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 5 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +106% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+27%

Still filing today

40%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $362k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Arts & CulturePublic BenefitHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OR
    ONGAVA RESEARCH CENTRE
    3× · 2020–2025 · $440k
  • CT
    CULTURE TRUST OF PHILADELPHIA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $310k
  • PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2025 · $245k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • WS
    WOODSTOCK STREET FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.3M
  • OR
    ONGAVA RESEARCH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $125k
  • B
    BREASTCANCERORGgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue +183%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
2
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
3
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
4
The Philadelphia Orchestra and Kimmel Center Inc

Pokc was formed for charitable and educational purposes and is dedicated to the promotion of the arts.

Arts & Culture
5
Kimmel Center Inc

The kimmel center inc, d/b/a ensemble arts philly's mission is to share the transformative power of the performing arts and arts education with the widest possible audience.

Arts & Culture
6
Association for Public Art

The association for public art (apa, formerly the fairmount park art association) commissions, preserves, interprets and promotes public art in philadelphia. dedicated to creating a museum without walls that informs, engages and inspires…

Arts & Culture
7
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
8
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
9
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
10
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
11
New York City Opera

New york city opera was famously dubbed "the people's opera" by mayor fiorello laguardia at its founding in 1943. more than 80 years later, city opera continues its historic mission to inspire audiences with innovative and theatrically…

Arts & Culture
12
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philadelphia Orchestra Association; the most unlike its peers is Camp Sunshine At Sebago Lake Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOODSTOCK STREET FOUNDATION INC: $1,250,000 · OtherWOODSTOCK STREET FOUNDATION INCONGAVA RESEARCH CENTRE: $440,000 · OtherONGAVA RESEARCH CENTRECULTURE TRUST OF PHILADELPHIA: $310,000 · OtherCULTURE TRUST OF PHILADELPHIAONGAVA RESEARCH CENTER: $125,000 · OtherONGAVA RESEARCH CENTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FAO THE BARNES FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Other+5 more: $100,761 · OtherPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $245,391 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA ORCHES…OPERA PHILADELPHIA: $150,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA PHILADELPHIAWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $95,000 · Arts & CultureWOODMERE ART MUSEUMTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBREASTCANCERORG: $75,000 · HealthGreater Philadelphia Film Office: $50,000 · Public BenefitARTISTYEAR: $37,500 · EducationCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$2,325,761Arts & Culture$515,391Health$75,000Public Benefit$50,000Education$37,500Recreation & Sports$10,000Youth Development$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $245,391 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $150,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $95,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBREASTCANCERORG: $75,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetGreater Philadelphia Film Office: $50,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetARTISTYEAR: $37,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERA PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds WOODMERE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BREASTCANCERORG ↗
  • Who funds Greater Philadelphia Film Office ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTYEAR ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BROAD STREET MINISTRY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Skylight Foundation Inc the Siegfried Group funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Skylight Foundation Inc the Siegfried Group. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Skylight Foundation Inc the Siegfried Group?

    Find your warmest path to Skylight Foundation Inc the Siegfried Group through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Skylight Foundation Inc the Siegfried Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph