Skip to content

· Private foundation

Skipping Stone Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$178k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of Skipping Stone Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Hawaii Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
3
’18
2
’19
1
’20
0
’21
2
’22
0
’23
1
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$357kPhilanthropy$340kArts & Culture$68kYouth Development$6kEnvironment$5kHousing & Shelter$3kRecreation & Sports$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $178k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAWAI'I COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$178,315
WHATCOM COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIO$35,000
EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE$30,000
Individual grant recipient$2,575
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I$2,000
WESTERN WA UNIVERSITY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$421k · 7 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$421k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+7%

Still filing today

14%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WHATCOM COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIO
    6× · 2019–2025 · $275k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I
    2× · 2024–2025 · $52k
  • ES
    EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $43k

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION S PUGET SOUND
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE FORESTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -28%
  • WT
    WASHINGTON TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESE
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Whatcom Community College Foundation

The wcc foundation strengthens educational opportunities by providing student scholarships, supporting faculty and staff development, and assisting with key college initiatives.

Education
2
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
3
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture
4
Whatcom Land Trust

The mission of the Whatcom Land Trust is to preserve and protect wildlife habitat, scenic, agricultural and open space lands in Whatcom County for future generations by securing interests in land and promoting land stewardship.

Environment
5
Cowlitz Economic Development Council

Foster Growth in the Community

—
6
Washington Filmworks

To build and enhance the competitiveness of Washington State's film and associated creative industry. We accomplish this by marketing and managing the state's production incentive program, representing the state in national and…

Community Improvement
7
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
8
Invest in Washington Now Campaign

Advocate for tax policy in Washington State

—
9
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
10
Washington Wildlife & Recreation Coalition

Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.

—
11
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
12
Whatcom Mountain Bike Coalition

Whatcom Mountain Bike Coalition's (WMBC) mission is to preserve and enhance non-motorized trail access in Whatcom County through stewardship, education and advocacy.WMBC is a federal non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. We work with many…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whatcom Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Center for Responsible Forestry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHATCOM COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIO: $275,355 · OtherWHATCOM COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIOUNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I: $52,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'IEVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE: $42,570 · OtherEVERGREEN STATE COLLEGEWESTERN WA UNIVERSITY: $37,227 · OtherWESTERN WA UNIVERSITY+13 more: $38,815 · Other+13 moreHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $328,315 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE FORESTRY: $5,000 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE CONNECTIONS: $2,000 · EnvironmentALLIED ARTS OF WHATCOM COUNTY: $3,000 · Arts & CultureWHATCOM MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Arts & CultureOPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $2,488 · Human ServicesKULSHAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $1,030 · Housing & Shelter
Other$445,967Philanthropy$330,315Environment$7,000Arts & Culture$5,000Human Services$2,488Housing & Shelter$1,030

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $328,315 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE FORESTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSYLVIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $5,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF WHATCOM COUNTY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $2,488 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHATCOM MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUSTAINABLE CONNECTIONS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKULSHAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE FORESTRY ↗
  • Who funds SYLVIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED ARTS OF WHATCOM COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BELLINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds KULSHAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Whatcom Community FoundationWA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Whatcom Community Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · First Fed Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of Whatcom County · Mount Baker Foundation · Chuckanut Health Foundation · Mary H Storer Foundation · Riverstyx Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Skipping Stone Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Skipping Stone Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Skipping Stone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph