Skip to content

· Private foundation

Siriwan Singhasiri and Kenneth Lin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$10MInternational$5.0MYouth Development$1.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.0MSocial Science$1.0MPublic Benefit$500kPhilanthropy$450kAnimals$300kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $720k
  • $250k+10 grants · $5.8M
$250,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$185M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF$1,500,000
CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$750,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA$750,000
OAKLAND PROMISE$500,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$500,000
CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC$500,000
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION$500,000
MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC$250,000
HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL$250,000
SHE-CAN GLOBAL INC$250,000
OPPORTUNITY 180$150,000
TEACHAAPI$120,000
FULFILLMENT FUND LAS VEGAS$100,000
FIRST NV$100,000
KUKIO HOOMANA FUND$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA: $750k → 13%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA: $500k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CA
NC
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Siriwan Singhasiri and Kenneth Lin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Siriwan Singhasiri and Kenneth Lin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 13 repeat orgs$5.0M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$15M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+32%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3.6M · revenue +12%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +1%
  • OP
    OAKLAND PROMISE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +32%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue +134%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -16% · 39% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
2
Onegoal

Onegoal (the organization") is a nonprofit organization incorporated on june 13, 2003 to provide underserved students with the resources, support, and network to earn a postsecondary degree.

Youth Development
3
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
4
Equal Opportunity Schools

Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
7
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
8
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
9
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
10
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
11
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
12
Kipp Bay Area Schools

Together with families and communities, we create joyful, academically excellent schools that prepare students with the skills and confidence to pursue the paths they choose college, career, and beyond so they can lead fulfilling lives and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is Monterey Bay Aquarium Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3,600,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,884,500 · OtherCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION …MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC: $500,000 · OtherMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INCTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $500,000 · OtherTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATIONMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Other+6 more: $601,000 · Other+6 moreUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,500,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR…PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $1,000,000 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S R…HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $500,000 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATI…THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $1,400,000 · EducationTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC E…OAKLAND PROMISE: $1,250,000 · EducationOAKLAND PROMISESHE-CAN GLOBAL INC: $500,000 · EducationSHE-CAN GLOBAL INCOPPORTUNITY 180: $150,000 · EducationTEACHAAPI: $120,000 · Education+3 more: $165,000 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND G…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIR…EAST BAY ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $400,000 · Youth DevelopmentEAST BAY A…FIRST NV: $350,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIRST NVGen-One Inc: $75,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA INC: $1,250,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $1,000,000 · Public Safety & DisasterAIRBNBORG INC: $100,000 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $1,000,000 · Social Science
Other$7,385,500International$4,000,000Education$3,585,000Youth Development$1,835,000Human Services$1,250,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,110,000Social Science$1,000,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3,600,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,500,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,884,500 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $1,400,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetOAKLAND PROMISE: $1,250,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA INC: $1,250,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC: $500,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $500,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $500,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHE-CAN GLOBAL INC: $500,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetEAST BAY ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $400,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetFIRST NV: $350,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $225,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetKUKIO HOOMANA FUND: $200,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetOPPORTUNITY 180: $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTEACHAAPI: $120,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetPROJECT ALIANZA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetAIRBNBORG INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND LAS VEGAS: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetGen-One Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetREDWOOD DAY SCHOOL: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACADEMY OF FINANCE NEVADA: $25,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raiders Foundation NvNV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raiders Foundation Nv · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · The Boyd Family Foundation · The Mel & Ruth Wolzinger Foundation · Windsong Trust · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · United Way of Southern Nevada · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · United Way Worldwide · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Siriwan Singhasiri and Kenneth Lin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Siriwan Singhasiri and Kenneth Lin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Siriwan Singhasiri and Kenneth Lin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Siriwan Singhasiri and Kenneth Lin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Siriwan Singhasiri and Kenneth Lin’s filings →

More from the funding graph