Skip to content

· Private foundation

Simon Estes Foundation

PROVIDE MUSICAL SCHOLARSHIPS, PERFORMANCE EXPERIENCE, AND ERADICATE MALARIA.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$235kEducation$34kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$965k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DES MOINES METRO OPERA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $3k → 17%UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION: $200k → 14%DES MOINES METRO OPERA: $5k → 6%LUTHER COLLEGE: $900 → 10%DMACC FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%UNIVERISTY OF IOWA: $15k → 15%INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 16%BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $800 → 14%UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION (NOTHING BUT NETS): $35k → 14%ALBIA HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 10%UNIVERISTY OF IOWA: $2k → 15%DMACC FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%FOOD BANK OF IOWA: $10k → 10%DMACC FOUNDATION: $800 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$259k · 3 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +137% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$259k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+137%
+24%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $235k · revenue -16%
  • SU
    State University of Iowa
    2× · 2022–2024 · $17k
  • DF
    DMACC FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2022 · $7k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF IOWAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +42%
  • PS
    PEO SISTERHOOD INTERNATIONAL CHAPTER
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • MS
    MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
2
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
3
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
4
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
5
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
6
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
9
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
10
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
11
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
12
Upper Iowa University

Upper iowa university provides quality educational opportunities accessible through varied delivery methods to inspire success and empower lives.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Des Moines Metro Opera Inc; the most unlike its peers is Manhattan School of Music. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $235,000 · InternationalUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INCState University of Iowa: $16,800 · OtherState Uni…PEO SISTERHOOD INTERNATIONAL CHAPTER: $4,000 · OtherPEO SISTE…UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA: $1,800 · OtherUNIVERSIT…INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,600 · OtherINDIAN HI…+1 more: $800 · OtherFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $10,000 · Food & NutritionDMACC FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationLUTHER COLLEGE: $900 · EducationBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $800 · EducationDES MOINES METRO OPERA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
International$235,000Other$25,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Education$8,700Arts & Culture$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $235,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDMACC FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDES MOINES METRO OPERA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,600 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Simon Estes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Simon Estes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Simon Estes Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Simon Estes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Simon Estes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph