Skip to content

· Private foundation

Silver Star Brands Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$216kYouth Development$90kEducation$44kHousing & Shelter$39kArts & Culture$37kHuman Services$35kFood & Nutrition$17kRecreation & Sports$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$790k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OSHKOSH BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$5,550
BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS$5,000
PAINE ART CENTER & GARDENS INC$2,000
OSHKOSH CHAMBER FOUNDATION$1,500
NAMI OSHKOSH INC$500
FVTC FOUNDATION INC$500
DOWNTOWN OSHKOSH INC$350
OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER: $8k → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $5k → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $5k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER: $5k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER: $5k → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $5k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER: $5k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER: $2k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER: $750 → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER: $500 → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $150 → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $150 → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA 20TH ANNIV: $150 → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $150 → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA 20TH ANNIV: $150 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$499k · 32 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
30

Total granted

$499k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+51%

Still filing today

59%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +54%
  • FV
    FOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +28%
  • DAY BY DAY SHELTER INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $26k · revenue +175%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF NW GREAT LAKES
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oshkosh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.

—
2
Oshkosh Chamber of Commerce

To provide leadership and to serve and represent our members so their businesses and our communities will prosper.

—
3
Oshkosh Area Community Property Corporation

To support the mission and activities of the oshkosh area community foundation corporation.

Philanthropy
4
Greater Oshkosh Economic Development Corporation

To provide leadership, direction, coordination, and services to advance economic development in the greater oshkosh area.

Community Improvement
5
Oshkosh United Soccer Club

Soccer club that develops youth soccer players ages 6 through high school via training, league play, and tournaments.

Recreation & Sports
6
Oconomowoc Area Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
7
Oconto County Economic Development Corporation

Stimulate development of the local economy, provide support to existing and prospective employers, serve as a professional resource to local units of government and promote tourism opportunities within oconto county wisconsin.

Community Improvement
8
One Wisconsin Now Inc

To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.

—
9
Friends of Wisconsin State Parks Inc

To preserve, promote, protect, and enhance wisconsin state parks, forests, trails, and recreation areas.

Recreation & Sports
10
Oakwood Village University Woods Homes Inc

Oakwood is called to serve a thriving community where seniors live with dignity, connection, and purpose.

Health
11
Oshkosh Kids Foundation Inc

The purpose of the oshkosh kids foundation, under the guidance of the social workers and community service partners, is to give immediate support to homeless and struggling kids and families in the oshkosh area. the organization also…

Youth Development
12
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INC: $143,275 · OtherOSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INCUNITED WAY: $72,000 · OtherUNITED WAYFOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 · OtherFOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EAST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $17,250 · Other+47 more: $95,245 · Other+47 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC: $50,650 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…GIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS …+2 more: $900 · Youth DevelopmentDAY BY DAY SHELTER INC: $26,250 · Human ServicesDAY BY DAY…Oshkosh Community YMCA: $15,900 · Human ServicesOshkosh Co…CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTINE …PAINE ART CENTER & GARDENS INC: $14,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GRAND OSHKOSH INC: $8,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $16,500 · Food & NutritionHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC: $12,900 · Housing & ShelterUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationOSHKOSH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Education
Other$356,770Youth Development$57,550Human Services$50,150Arts & Culture$22,100Food & Nutrition$16,500Housing & Shelter$12,900Education$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INC: $143,275 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC: $50,650 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDAY BY DAY SHELTER INC: $26,250 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EAST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $17,250 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $16,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOshkosh Community YMCA: $15,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPAINE ART CENTER & GARDENS INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC: $12,900 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC: $9,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GRAND OSHKOSH INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNami Oshkosh Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetOSHKOSH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFriends of Oshkosh Parks Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetLIFE PROMOTIONS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERFEST INC: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIT OSHKOSH INC: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWRIGHTSTOWN AREA BASEBALL ASSOCIATI: $150 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC ↗
  • Who funds FOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DAY BY DAY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EAST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Oshkosh Community YMCA ↗
  • Who funds PAINE ART CENTER & GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GRAND OSHKOSH INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Nami Oshkosh Inc ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Oshkosh Parks Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oshkosh Area Community Foundation CorporationWI44.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Jek Foundation Inc · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Area United Way Inc · Otto Bremer Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Silver Star Brands Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Silver Star Brands Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Silver Star Brands Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Silver Star Brands Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Silver Star Brands’ filings →

    More from the funding graph