Skip to content

· Private foundation

Silver Lining Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$363k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$265kEducation$232kPublic Benefit$212kCommunity Improvement$146kEnvironment$84kFood & Nutrition$71kHealth$51kArts & Culture$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $226k
$2,600
Median grant
5
States reached
$408k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REACH DANE - RED ARROW$83,000
STARTINGBLOCK MADISON INC$75,000
TODAY NOT TOMORROW$68,268
COLLABORATIVE 523 INC$41,700
LAKE RIPLEY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT$19,000
ROOTED$15,000
CAMBRIDGE ARTS COUNCIL INC$12,500
ALDO LEOPOLD SCHOOL PARENT FACULTY$9,200
NORTHPORT COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER$9,048
THREE GAITS INC$7,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
LAKEVIEW ELEMENTARY PTO$2,600
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$2,500
MADISON NORTHSIDE PLANNING COUNCIL INC$2,500
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOUND GENERATIONS: $513 → 9%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $600 → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $600 → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $520 → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%DOYENNE GROUP: $500 → 10%YMCA OF DANE COUNTY: $300 → 10%MIDDLETON OUTREACH MINISTRY: $13k → 10%MIDDLETON OUTREACH MINISTRY: $8k → 10%MIDDLETON OUTREACH MINISTRY: $4k → 10%MIDDLETON OUTREACH MINISTRY: $1k → 10%MIDDLETON OUTREACH MINISTRY: $738 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
NV
PA
UT
DE
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 34 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
41

Total granted

$1.3M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
0%

Still filing today

41%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +74%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2025 · $11k · revenue +43%
  • CH
    CAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIO
    3× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +715%

Funded once

  • LJ
    LITTLE JOHN'S RESTAURANT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $45k · revenue -76%
  • SI
    SECTOR67 INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +40%
  • CA
    CABRIDGE ARTS COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
2
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
3
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
Wisconsin Technology Innovation Initiative Inc

Support, promote, and facilitate partnerships with and provide funding for innovative early-stage and startup companies to lessen the burdens of government by promoting economic development and creating sustaining jobs in wisconsin.

—
6
Downtown Madison Inc

Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.

—
7
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
8
Wisconsin Women's Business Initiative Corporation

Wwbic opens the doors of opportunity by providing any individuals who are interested in starting, strengthening, or expanding businesses with access to resources such as financial products and quality business and personal financial…

—
9
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
10
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
11
Chicago Blend Group Inc

Creating a more inclusive venture capital and entrepreneurial ecosystem.

Community Improvement
12
United Way of Dane County Inc

Unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Madison Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Vegas City Opera Formerly Sin City Opera. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
21/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REACH DANE - RED ARROW: $257,956 · OtherREACH DANE - RED ARROWGREATER MADISON RESOURCE CENTER: $212,044 · OtherGREATER MADISON RESOURCE CENTERTODAY NOT TOMORROW INC: $135,268 · OtherTODAY NOT TOMORROW INCNORTHPORT COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER: $98,716 · OtherNORTHPORT COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERMADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: $84,274 · OtherMADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICTREAP: $71,151 · OtherREAPCOLLABORATIVE 523 INC: $64,700 · OtherCOLLABORATIVE 523 INCLAKE RIPLEY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: $45,000 · OtherLITTLE JOHN'S RESTAURANT INC: $44,800 · Other+48 more: $180,949 · Other+48 moreSTARTINGBLOCK MADISON INC: $78,500 · Community ImprovementSECTOR67 INC: $7,500 · Community ImprovementWISCONSIN TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC: $5,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $2,500 · Community ImprovementROOTED WI INC: $39,000 · EnvironmentWAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC: $26,446 · Human ServicesIRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3,720 · Human Services+3 more: $1,313 · Human ServicesCAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIO: $10,000 · Arts & CultureORCHESTRA INC: $6,501 · Arts & CultureMake Music Alliance Inc: $2,500 · Arts & CultureVegas City Opera Formerly Sin City Opera: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCambridge-Deerfield Players Theater: $1,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $6,250 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 · HealthBleeding Disorders Alliance Illinois: $1,545 · HealthCHILD CANCER FUND INC: $518 · HealthGLOBAL BLOOD DISORDER FOUNDATION: $515 · HealthTHE HEMOPHILIA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $515 · Health+1 more: $374 · HealthTHREE GAITS INC: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsNORTHEAST SIDE SHERMAN YOUTH BASKETBALL: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,194,858Community Improvement$93,500Environment$39,000Human Services$31,479Arts & Culture$22,001Health$14,717Recreation & Sports$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTARTINGBLOCK MADISON INC: $78,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLITTLE JOHN'S RESTAURANT INC: $44,800 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetROOTED WI INC: $39,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetWAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC: $26,446 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIO: $10,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetSECTOR67 INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetORCHESTRA INC: $6,501 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $6,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPORCHLIGHT INC: $4,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST SIDE SHERMAN YOUTH BASKETBALL: $4,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetIRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3,720 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSCOUNSEL INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $3,250 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBIKES FOR KIDS WISCONSIN INC: $3,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMELLOWHOOD FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMake Music Alliance Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $1,971 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBleeding Disorders Alliance Illinois: $1,545 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD CANCER FUND INC: $518 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL BLOOD DISORDER FOUNDATION: $515 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HEMOPHILIA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $515 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUND GENERATIONS: $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDoyenne Group Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAYDM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBox of Balloons Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $374 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Dane County Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STARTINGBLOCK MADISON INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE JOHN'S RESTAURANT INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOTED WI INC ↗
  • Who funds WAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIO ↗
  • Who funds SECTOR67 INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE GAITS INC ↗
  • Who funds ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds PORCHLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST SIDE SHERMAN YOUTH BASKETBALL ↗
  • Who funds IRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSCOUNSEL INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BIKES FOR KIDS WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MELLOWHOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON NORTHSIDE PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madison Community FoundationWI41.5× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madison Community Foundation · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · The Evjue Foundation Inc · Trustage Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · Widen Family Foundation Inc · Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · First Business Charitable Foundation Inc · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Silver Lining Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Silver Lining Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Silver Lining Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Silver Lining Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Silver Lining’s filings →

    More from the funding graph