Skip to content

· Private foundation

Silva Weiss Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$221k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$378kArts & Culture$323kPhilanthropy$304kHealth$135kCivil Rights$123kPublic Benefit$53kEmployment$42kEnvironment$33kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $155k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SILVERLAKE CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$40,000
VASSAR COLLEGE$25,000
PUEBLO NUEVO EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT GROUP$15,000
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
PROPUBLICA$10,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$10,000
WOMENS DONOR NETWORK$10,000
LHF$10,000
DKT INTERNATIONAL$10,000
REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES$5,000
ACCELERATE CHANGE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHIRLA$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AFIYA CENTER: $3k → 14%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $10k → 17%PATH: $5k → 14%PATH: $3k → 14%PATH: $3k → 14%PATH: $3k → 14%PATH: $1k → 14%PATH: $500 → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
CA
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 36 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
42

Total granted

$1.0M
$234k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+15%

Still filing today

69%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHealthEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    BRING ON THE MUSIC INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $228k · revenue +90%
  • PN
    PUEBLO NUEVO EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT G
    5× · 2019–2024 · $190k · revenue +41%
  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CN
    CAMINO NUEVO CHARTER ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $65k · revenue +56%
  • MF
    MUSICARES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -11%
  • VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
3
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
6
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
7
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
8
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
9
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc; the most unlike its peers is Unatti Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/66
Grantees still filing
40/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRING ON THE MUSIC INC: $227,500 · EducationBRING ON THE MUSIC INCPUEBLO NUEVO EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT G: $190,000 · EducationPUEBLO NUEVO EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT GCAMINO NUEVO CHARTER ACADEMY: $65,000 · EducationCAMINO NUEVO CHARTER ACADEMYOAKWOOD SCHOOL: $47,000 · EducationOAKWOOD SCHOOL+3 more: $16,000 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $80,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODVASSAR COLLEGE: $60,000 · OtherVASSAR COLLEGELHF: $50,000 · OtherLHFNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COALITION: $30,000 · OtherNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COAL…HILT FOUNDATION: $15,500 · OtherKCRW: $13,950 · OtherPATH: $14,000 · Other+44 more: $144,550 · Other+44 moreLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $197,500 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL FOUND…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWOMEN DONORS NETWORK: $10,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $7,200 · PhilanthropyTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $43,500 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER …COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $40,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION F…REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $30,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & I…THE COLLECTIVE EDUCATION FUND: $20,000 · Civil RightsTHE COLLECT…NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $5,000 · Civil Rights+3 more: $5,500 · Civil RightsMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC: $15,500 · Arts & CultureCLOCKSHOP: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $2,375 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $39,500 · HealthABORTION CARE NETWORK: $10,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $6,000 · HealthWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $5,000 · HealthTJ MARTELL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthCURE JM FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 · InternationalDKT INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · InternationalHIAS INC: $5,000 · InternationalUnatti Foundation: $3,250 · International
Education$545,500Other$408,000Philanthropy$254,700Civil Rights$149,000Arts & Culture$70,375Health$69,000International$33,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRING ON THE MUSIC INC: $227,500 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $197,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPUEBLO NUEVO EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT G: $190,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCAMINO NUEVO CHARTER ACADEMY: $65,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOAKWOOD SCHOOL: $47,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $43,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $39,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLECTIVE EDUCATION FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN DONORS NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDKT INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABORTION CARE NETWORK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget826LA: $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SKATEPARK PROJECT: $6,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHIAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGround Game Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUnatti Foundation: $3,250 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWest Fund: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetClinic Access Support Network: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGE COLLECTIVE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTJ MARTELL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNorth Bay Organizing Project: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEE INITIATIVE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE JM FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMALAMA KAUAI: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetProyecto Pastoral: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRING ON THE MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO NUEVO EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT G ↗
  • Who funds CAMINO NUEVO CHARTER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MUSICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLECTIVE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PABLOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN DONORS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DKT INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOS ANGELES CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ABORTION CARE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds 826LA ↗
  • Who funds THE SKATEPARK PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA32.4× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Liberty Hill Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Groundswell Fund · New Venture Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Silva Weiss Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Silva Weiss Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Silva Weiss Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Silva Weiss Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Silva Weiss Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph