Skip to content

· Private foundation

Silas Foundation Co Trust

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$59k
Granted FY2017
7
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

87% of Silas Foundation Co Trust’s FY2018 grant dollars went to Bank Of America Charitable Gift Fd, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Silas Foundation Co Trust named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $59k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
4
’18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Philanthropy$68kArts & Culture$60kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2017 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k6 grants · $9k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER$50,000
BARTLESVILLE REGIONAL UNITED WAY$5,000
CHILDREN'S MUSICAL THEATRE$2,000
OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE$1,000
CHEROKEE AREA BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$500
Westside Community Center$300
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BARTLESVILLE REGIONAL UNITED WAY: $5k → 14%GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA: $1k → 15%OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE: $2k → 16%CHILDREN'S MUSICAL THEATRE: $2k → 14%GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA: $100 → 15%OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE: $1k → 16%CHEROKEE AREA BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $500 → 14%CHEROKEE AREA BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

7%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5k · 3 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2017, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$5k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+0%

Still filing today

67%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +42%
  • GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • CA
    CHEROKEE AREA BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k

Funded once

  • PT
    PRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -219%
  • BR
    BARTLESVILLE REGIONAL UNITED WAY IN
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +0%
  • BS
    BARTLESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barnsdall Arts

Our mission is to provide quality art education and exhibitions that nurture creativity, acquisition of artistic skills, and aesthetic appreciation of art. Our outstanding programs build communtiy through access, engagement, excellence and…

Arts & Culture
2
Bartlesville Art Association

Our mission is to serve the community through education, skill development and promotion of the visual arts.

—
3
Ballet Oklahoma Inc

Okc ballet promotes the art of dance by supporting a professional company and its productions, operating a school of ballet for dance artists, children, and novice adults, and providing community engagement activities.

Arts & Culture
4
Baker Community Arts Association
Arts & Culture
5
Barrington Arts Alive

To provide opportunities for children and teens to experience the performing arts through programs offered at their local schools and in their community.

Arts & Culture
6
Broadway School of Music & the Arts

Community based lessons and classes for children and adults in music and the arts.

Arts & Culture
7
Batesville Area Arts Council Inc

to promote the arts by providing opportunities for artistic expression, education & enjoyment in Batesville and the surrounding area

—
8
American Baroque Opera Company

American baroque opera company operates in the state of texas for the primary purpose of furthering the appreciaton of music, particularly opera, for the general public. american baroque opera company performs select operas throughout the…

Arts & Culture
9
Beaufort Arts and Music Inc

To promote the arts, play a pivotal role in the cultural and economic advancement of the region, and inspire the community to engage in appreciation of arts and music at all levels.

Arts & Culture
10
Barnesville State Theater Company

To restore and preserve the state theater building.

Arts & Culture
11
Bardo La

The specific purposes for which this corporation is organized are to foster international exchange of arts and culture via traveling exhibitions and events; and to curate art exhibitions in the public shere both nationally and…

Arts & Culture
12
Bay Area Friends of the Fine Arts

Promotion and advancement of the arts including fostering of the public's interest in the arts and the development of artists and display of their art works of all types. formation and operation of an orchestra and a chorus to provide…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bartlesville Regional United Way in; the most unlike its peers is Westside Community Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $63,469 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FDBARTLESVILLE REGIONAL UNITED WAY IN: $5,000 · PhilanthropyBARTLESVILLE REGIONAL UNITED WAY INPRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INC: $50,000 · OtherPRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INCBARTLESVILLE CIVIC BALLET INC: $2,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S MUSICAL THEATRE: $2,000 · Other+2 more: $2,500 · OtherOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureBARTLESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureWESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $300 · Arts & CultureGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $1,100 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$68,469Other$56,500Arts & Culture$5,800Youth Development$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetBARTLESVILLE REGIONAL UNITED WAY IN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBARTLESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bartlesville Community FoundationOK15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bartlesville Community Foundation · K S Adams Foundation Co-Trust · Lyon Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Silas Foundation Co Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Silas Foundation Co Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Oklahoma Arts Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Silas’ filings →

More from the funding graph