Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Silas & Ruth Claypool Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$95kEducation$52kFood & Nutrition$34kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kCrime & Legal$24kHuman Services$23kArts & Culture$19kHealth$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$402k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PALESTINE CUSD 3$10,000
CRAWFORD COUNTY SADDLE CLUB$2,500
PALESTINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION$2,500
PALESTINE PRESERVATION PROJECT SOCI$2,500
OBLONG CHILDREN'S CHRISTIAN HOME$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OBLONG CHILDREN'S CHRISTIAN HOME: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$141k · 7 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
24

Total granted

$141k
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+22%

Still filing today

14%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionCommunity ImprovementEmploymentEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2019–2025 · $33k
  • PC
    Palestine CUSD#3
    3× · 2021–2025 · $30k
  • CC
    Crawford County Fair Association
    5× · 2019–2023 · $28k

Funded once

  • CC
    Crawford County Sheriff Department
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CO
    City of Robinson Parks Department
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CC
    CRAWFORD COUNTY KIDS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -59%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crawford County Farm Bureau

The mission of the Crawford County Farm Bureau is to provide social, educational and promotional activities, programs and services for its membership, that will further the local agricultural industry.

2
Community Food Pantry

Local Community Food Pantry

Food & Nutrition
3
Pratt County Foodbank Inc

County food bank to assist with food needs of limited income families

Food & Nutrition
4
Crawford County United Ministries Inc

To serve poor and needy individuals and families in Crawford County; to foster c cooperation and coordination among churches and religious organizations serving

Human Services
5
Crawford County Fair Assc

The Crawford County Fair Association intends to create a safe modern, convenient meeting place for all Crawford County citizens and visitor to the area. Our purpose is to provide building, shelters, seating, and open areas for recreational…

Arts & Culture
6
The Crawford County Fair Association Incorporated

The organization is ran and managed by a group of volunteers and is mandated to manage the county fairgrounds year-round as well as organize fund and implement the annual county fair in Crawford County KS. It is funded from local…

Recreation & Sports
7
Coal City Food Pantry

Provide food to people in need within the Coal City School District.

Food & Nutrition
8
New Vision Community Services

Food Pantry

Food & Nutrition
9
Crawford County Humane Society

Humane care and treatment of animals

Animals
10
Crawford County Development Association

To conduct activities toward economic development for all of Crawford County, Illinois.

Community Improvement
11
Community Food Pantry

To provide emergency food for indigent families in the surrounding counties.

Food & Nutrition
12
Clifton Community Food Pantry

To supply food to low income families

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crawford County Kids Association and the most unlike its peers is Palestine Community Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $33,136 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPalestine CUSD#3 — $30,000 · OtherPalestine CUSD#3Crawford County Fair Association — $27,625 · OtherCrawford County Fair AssociationCrawford County Sheriff's Office — $20,000 · OtherCrawford County Sheriff's OfficeCrawford County Sheriff Department — $10,000 · OtherCity of Robinson Parks Department — $10,000 · OtherCrawford County VFW Post 4549 — $10,000 · OtherRobinson CUSD #2 — $10,000 · OtherRobinson Soccer Club — $10,000 · OtherPalestine Public Library District — $9,225 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $8,955 · Other+15 more — $80,714 · Other+15 moreLawrence Crawford Association for Exceptional Citizens — $15,495 · EmploymentPALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHE ROBINSON AREA FOOD PANTRY — $3,225 · Food & NutritionCRAWFORD COUNTY KIDS ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · EducationCrawford County Heritage Foundation — $3,500 · Arts & CulturePalestine Development Association — $2,500 · Community ImprovementEMBARRAS RIVER BASIN AGENCY INC — $831 · Community ImprovementOBLONG CHILDREN'S CHRISTIAN HOME — $2,500 · Human ServicesCRAWFORD COUNTY SADDLE CLUB NFP — $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$259,655Employment$15,495Food & Nutrition$13,225Education$10,000Arts & Culture$3,500Community Improvement$3,331Human Services$2,500Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLawrence Crawford Association for Exceptional Citizens — $15,495 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY KIDS ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCrawford County Heritage Foundation — $3,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTHE ROBINSON AREA FOOD PANTRY — $3,225 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetOBLONG CHILDREN'S CHRISTIAN HOME — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPalestine Development Association — $2,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetEMBARRAS RIVER BASIN AGENCY INC — $831 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lawrence Crawford Association for Exceptional Citizens
  • Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY KIDS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Crawford County Heritage Foundation
  • Who funds THE ROBINSON AREA FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds OBLONG CHILDREN'S CHRISTIAN HOME
  • Who funds Palestine Development Association
  • Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY SADDLE CLUB NFP
  • Who funds EMBARRAS RIVER BASIN AGENCY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary Heath FoundationIL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary Heath Foundation · Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation · Eastern Illinois Foodbank · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Silas & Ruth Claypool Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Silas & Ruth Claypool Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Silas & Ruth Claypool Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph