Skip to content

· Public charity

Shunpike

SHUNPIKE empowers artists through equitable access to vital expertise, opportunities and business services.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$123k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.9MHuman Services$1.0MHousing & Shelter$193kYouth Development$121kReligion$103kCommunity Improvement$44kHealth$33kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $887,519, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,070,952 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $183,433 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $683k
$14,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VASHON ARTIST RESIDENCY LLC$123,048
ADAPTIVE AND INCLUSIVE MOVEMENT INITIATIVE$114,455
ENJOY PRODUCTIONS INC$100,576
NORTHWEST FILM FORUM$87,383
PORK FILLED PRODUCTIONS$69,934
ROBEL AND MICAEL DBA UPNUP LLC$69,721
THALIA'S UMBRELLA$64,389
SEATTLE ARTIST LEAGUE LLC$53,225
DACHA THEATRE$26,897
BRYAN OHNO LTD$16,275
WASHINGTON CAPOEIRA CENTER LLC$14,890
SHATTERED GLASS PROJECT$14,694
THEATRE BATTERY$14,500
SOUTHEAST ASIAN COMEDY COLLECTIVE LLC$14,053
DEEPTI DESIGNS INC$13,312
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $214k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ADAPTIVE AND INCLUSIVE MOVEMENT INITIATIVE: $114k → 9%ADAPTIVE AND INCLUSIVE MOVEMENT INITIATIVE: $99k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 29 repeat orgs$830k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +422% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
37

Total granted

$2.7M
$593k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+422%
+13%

Still filing today

14%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $237k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ADAPTIVE AND INCLUSIVE MOVEMENT INITIATIVE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $214k · revenue +155% · 94% of their budget
  • NF
    NORTHWEST FILM FORUM
    2× · 2022–2024 · $131k · revenue +16%
  • WM
    WORLD MIND CREATION ACADEMY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $88k · revenue +422% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • BL
    Borealis Light Art Collective
    one grant, 2018 · $86k
  • BC
    BUILDING CHANGES
    one grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue +6%
  • SH
    South Hudson Music Projectgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $42k · revenue +46% · 39% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Washington Center for the Arts
Philanthropy
2
Pacific Northwest Music Project
Arts & Culture
3
Willapa Bay AiR
Arts & Culture
4
Spokane Interactive Arts

we're an arts non profit that serves underserved artists through our residency program

Arts & Culture
5
Washington Ensemble Theatre

Through collaborative artistic leadership, Washington Ensemble Theatre fearlessly creates audacious stories for adventurous Seattle audiences.

Arts & Culture
6
Seattle Artists

Musical and other cultural performances and music education for youth

—
7
18th & Union

18th & Union's mission is to sustain an affordable, inclusive, and intimate space that nurtures art and community. 18th & Union maintains a 48-seat performance space, including lobby, restrooms, storage, and theatrical lighting, sound, and…

Arts & Culture
8
Strawberry Theatre Workshop

Strawberry Theatre Workshop is committed to the idea that the theatre is the peoples place of aspiration and that any voice from the stage is translated exponentially into conversations at coffee shops bus stops classrooms and playfields.…

Arts & Culture
9
Future Arts

Our mission is to cultivate cross-pollination between technology, nature, and the arts. We connect, mentor, commission and develop showcasing opportunities for underserved new media artists.

Arts & Culture
10
Puget Sound Revels

Puget Sound Revels builds community through the arts using traditional song dance and story drawn from many cultures. Revels offers theater productions seasonal celebrations and educational opportunities for people of all ages races…

Arts & Culture
11
Seattle Metropolitan Chamber Orchestra

The Seattle Metropolitan Chamber Orchestra crafts performances that tell the story of the human experience in new ways, providing musical arts education and fulfillment to people of all walks of life. SMCO features music by composers of…

Arts & Culture
12
Theatre Puget Sound

TPS works to foster and advocate for a robust and equitable theatre community in the Puget Sound Region.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Shakespeare Festival; the most unlike its peers is Unleash the Brilliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Thalias Umbrella: $490,539 · OtherThalias UmbrellaWeApp: $303,589 · OtherWeAppVASHON ARTIST RESIDENCY LLC: $236,430 · OtherVASHON ARTIST RESIDENCY LLCPORK FILLED PRODUCTIONS: $140,638 · OtherROBEL AND MICAEL DBA UPNUP LLC: $124,650 · OtherANTHONY R BENTON DBA MUSICA DBA RAINIER AVENUE RADIO WORLD: $121,282 · OtherCOPIOUS LOVE: $109,809 · OtherENJOY PRODUCTIONS INC: $100,576 · Other+49 more: $1,256,146 · Other+49 moreNORTHWEST FILM FORUM: $130,804 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST F…South Hudson Music Project: $41,923 · Arts & CultureSouth Hudso…NCW Arts Alliance: $37,208 · Arts & CultureNCW Arts Al…Seattle Ladies Choir: $35,883 · Arts & CultureSeattle Lad…THE RHAPSODY PROJECT: $26,943 · Arts & CultureTHE RHAPSOD…DACHA THEATRE: $26,897 · Arts & CultureDACHA THEAT…SEATTLE JEWISH CHORALE: $20,994 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE JEW…+7 more: $50,665 · Arts & Culture+7 moreADAPTIVE AND INCLUSIVE MOVEMENT INITIATIVE: $213,588 · Human ServicesBUILDING CHANGES: $45,350 · HealthUnleash the Brilliance: $17,812 · Crime & LegalTACOMA NEIGHBORHOODS TOGETHER: $9,526 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT FOR KLICKITAT COUNTY: $8,161 · Community ImprovementWRITE253: $9,488 · PhilanthropyEVERGREEN SOCIAL IMPACT: $7,336 · Philanthropy
Other$2,883,659Arts & Culture$371,317Human Services$213,588Health$45,350Crime & Legal$17,812Community Improvement$17,687Philanthropy$16,824

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADAPTIVE AND INCLUSIVE MOVEMENT INITIATIVE: $213,588 over 2y, 94% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM: $130,804 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetWORLD MIND CREATION ACADEMY: $88,073 over 2y, 41% of budgetBUILDING CHANGES: $45,350 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSouth Hudson Music Project: $41,923 over 1y, 39% of budgetSeattle Ladies Choir: $35,883 over 1y, 62% of budgetTHE RHAPSODY PROJECT: $26,943 over 1y, 16% of budgetDACHA THEATRE: $26,897 over 1y, 26% of budgetEASTHUB: $18,500 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetUnleash the Brilliance: $17,812 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetTACOMA NEIGHBORHOODS TOGETHER: $9,526 over 1y, 13% of budgetSEATTLE SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $9,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT FOR KLICKITAT COUNTY: $8,161 over 1y, 11% of budgetArtist Trust: $8,023 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOSS WATERWAY SEAPORT: $7,933 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEVERGREEN SOCIAL IMPACT: $7,336 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $6,728 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARD HUGO HOUSE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSEA-KING MEDIA GROUP: $5,232 over 1y, 67% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADAPTIVE AND INCLUSIVE MOVEMENT INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST FILM FORUM ↗
  • Who funds WORLD MIND CREATION ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING CHANGES ↗
  • Who funds South Hudson Music Project ↗
  • Who funds NCW Arts Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Ladies Choir ↗
  • Who funds THE RHAPSODY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds DACHA THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE JEWISH CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds EASTHUB ↗
  • Who funds Unleash the Brilliance ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ArtsfundWA30× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Artsfund · Raynier Institute & Foundation · School's Out Washington · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shunpike funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shunpike. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shunpike?

    Find your warmest path to Shunpike through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shunpike’s filings →

    More from the funding graph