Skip to content
Shrm Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Shrm Foundation Inc

Mobilize and equip hr to lead positive social change so that all talent and workplaces can prosper and thrive.

$774k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$204kEducation$184kEmployment$135kCommunity Improvement$20k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $40,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $774,063 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $734,063 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO SHRM$10,000
PROF IN HR ASSN (PIHRA) - CA$10,000
SHRM SAVANNAH INC$10,000
SHRM-ATLANTA - GA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTH EASTERN UNIVERSITY: $28k → 16%PHILADELPHIA SHRM: $10k → 10%The Tech Interactive: $50k → 8%PROF IN HR ASSN (PIHRA) - CA: $10k → 14%SOUTH CAROLINA SHRM STATE COUNCIL: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $43k → 13%HR MIAMI: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $49k → 15%Michigan State University Online Program: $15k → 16%SHRM-ATLANTA - GA: $10k → 8%SIOP Foundation Inc: $15k → 12%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $61k → 22%WASHINGTON SHRM STATE COUNCIL: $10k → 9%NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $8k → 13%CHICAGO SHRM: $10k → 14%ILLINOIS SHRM STATE COUNCIL: $10k → 15%COUNCIL FOR GLOBAL IMMIGRATION: $12k → 9%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $28k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $33k → 11%PIHRA (ORANGE CO): $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $33k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $12k → 15%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $10k → 22%CHICAGO SHRM: $10k → 14%ILLINOIS SHRM STATE COUNCIL: $10k → 15%SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: $8k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $3k → 11%HR PEOPLE STRATEGY: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
MA
IA
OH
PA
CA
VA
MD
SC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$304k · 7 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
14

Total granted

$304k
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+42%

Still filing today

43%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’23’24
Community ImprovementEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $76k
  • OU
    Ohio University
    2× · 2017–2018 · $71k
  • SU
    State University of Iowa
    2× · 2017–2018 · $61k

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TECH INTERACTIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +42%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue +110%
  • VH
    VCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS
    one grant, 2018 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Shrm

The purpose of the oregon shrm (affiliate of the society for human resource management)is to promote the educational and professional development of our members and to promote other non-profit purposes of the society of human resource…

Community Improvement
2
National Human Resources Association Orange County Affiliate

To provide an active forum within a supportive environment for strengthening the role of human resource professionals as strategic business leaders and partners.

Community Improvement
3
Michigan Council of the Society for Human Resource Management

To provide opportunities for local & regional shrm chapters to network, share best practices, & provide development opportunities to their attendees acting as a conduit to the society for human resource management (national shrm) which…

Community Improvement
4
Metro Milwaukee Shrm Inc

Metro milwaukee shrm is milwaukee's leading professional association for members of the human resource management profession. as one of the largest local affiliate chapters of the society for human resource management, metro milwaukee shrm…

—
5
Strategic Management Society Inc

The strategic management society, inc. (society) is a not-for-profit membership organization representing over 3,000 academics, business practitioners, and consultants from more than 80 different countries who are dedicated to the…

Education
6
Louisiana Society for Human Resource Management Council

The louisiana shrm state council represents human resource professionals in the state of louisiana and is supported through the national society for human resource management (shrm).

—
7
Society for Simulation in Healthcare

The Society will lead in facilitating excellence in (multi-specialty) healthcare education, practice, and research through simulation modalities.

Health
8
Society of Research Administrators International

To develop, define, and promote international best practices in research management, administration, knowledge transfer and growth of the research enterprise.

Education
9
National Academy of Human Resources Foundation

In 1994 the national academy of human resources (nahr) foundation was established to further contribute to the profession of human resources by conducting outreach initiatives for the profession through various programs, projects and…

Social Science
10
Society for Range Management

The mission of the society for range management is to promote the professional development and continuing education of members and the public and the stewardship of rangeland resources.

Food & Nutrition
11
Society for College & University Planning

The society for college and university planning develops individual and organizational capacities to strengthen and transform institutions of higher education.

—
12
Career Services & Employer Alliance Inc

Mba graduate management career services

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society for Human Resource Management; the most unlike its peers is The Tech Interactive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $75,797 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDAOhio University: $71,315 · OtherOhio UniversityState University of Iowa: $60,978 · OtherState University of IowaUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $35,877 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS: $27,602 · OtherVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUSPROFESSIONALS IN HUMAN RESOURCES ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · Other+8 more: $75,783 · Other+8 moreSOCIETY OF HUMAN RESOURCE PROFESSIONALS: $20,000 · Community ImprovementSOCIETY OF HUM…THE ILLINOIS STATE COUNCIL OF SHRM: $20,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ILLINOIS S…WASHINGTON STATE SHRM: $10,000 · Community ImprovementWASHINGTON STA…SC SHRM STATE COUNCIL: $9,500 · Community ImprovementSC SHRM STATE …SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: $7,965 · Community ImprovementSOCIETY FOR HU…THE TECH INTERACTIVE: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TECH I…NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $27,815 · EducationSIOP FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Education
Other$382,352Community Improvement$67,465Arts & Culture$50,000Education$42,815

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TECH INTERACTIVE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $27,815 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF HUMAN RESOURCE PROFESSIONALS: $20,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHE ILLINOIS STATE COUNCIL OF SHRM: $20,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetPROFESSIONALS IN HUMAN RESOURCES ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSIOP FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR GLOBAL IMMIGRATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGreater Miami Society for Human Resource Management: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE SHRM: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSociety for Human Resource Management SHRM-Atlanta INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MGT PHILADELPHIA REGION CHAPTER: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSC SHRM STATE COUNCIL: $9,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetSOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: $7,965 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHR PEOPLE & STRATEGY INC: $5,390 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shrm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shrm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shrm’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home