· Public charity
Shrm Foundation Inc
Mobilize and equip hr to lead positive social change so that all talent and workplaces can prosper and thrive.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $40,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $774,063 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $734,063 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROF IN HR ASSN (PIHRA) - CA | $10,000 |
| CHICAGO SHRM | $10,000 |
| SHRM-ATLANTA - GA | $10,000 |
| SHRM SAVANNAH INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA2× · 2017–2018 · $76k
- OUOhio University2× · 2017–2018 · $71k
- SUState University of Iowa2× · 2017–2018 · $61k
Funded once
- TTTHE TECH INTERACTIVEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +42%
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue +110%- VHVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUSone grant, 2018 · $28k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the oregon shrm (affiliate of the society for human resource management)is to promote the educational and professional development of our members and to promote other non-profit purposes of the society of human resource…
To provide opportunities for local & regional shrm chapters to network, share best practices, & provide development opportunities to their attendees acting as a conduit to the society for human resource management (national shrm) which…
To provide an active forum within a supportive environment for strengthening the role of human resource professionals as strategic business leaders and partners.
Metro milwaukee shrm is milwaukee's leading professional association for members of the human resource management profession. as one of the largest local affiliate chapters of the society for human resource management, metro milwaukee shrm…
The strategic management society, inc. (society) is a not-for-profit membership organization representing over 3,000 academics, business practitioners, and consultants from more than 80 different countries who are dedicated to the…
The louisiana shrm state council represents human resource professionals in the state of louisiana and is supported through the national society for human resource management (shrm).
The Society will lead in facilitating excellence in (multi-specialty) healthcare education, practice, and research through simulation modalities.
The mission of the society for range management is to promote the professional development and continuing education of members and the public and the stewardship of rangeland resources.
To support employers by providing a broad range of information, services, and training that enables them to successfully manage their most improtant assets, their people.
Humrro conducts high quality research on human resource issues, develops products, and provides services to develop and apply state-of-the-art science and technology to improve the performance of individuals and teams within public and…
To develop, define, and promote international best practices in research management, administration, knowledge transfer and growth of the research enterprise.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society for Human Resource Management and the most unlike its peers is The Tech Interactive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TECH INTERACTIVE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF HUMAN RESOURCE PROFESSIONALS ↗
- Who funds THE ILLINOIS STATE COUNCIL OF SHRM ↗
- Who funds PROFESSIONALS IN HUMAN RESOURCES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SIOP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR GLOBAL IMMIGRATION ↗
- Who funds Society for Human Resource Management SHRM-Atlanta INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE SHRM ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MGT PHILADELPHIA REGION CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds Greater Miami Society for Human Resource Management ↗
- Who funds SC SHRM STATE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds HR PEOPLE & STRATEGY INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Shrm Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.