Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Shine Together Inc

To create economic advancement for multiple generations, by partnering with young mothers to further their education, build life and career skills, and nuture their children's development.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$1.1MHuman Services$415kHealth$305k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $25,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $62,976 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $37,976 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARMONY AT HOME$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $529k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HARMONY AT HOME: $130k → 12%HARMONY AT HOME: $130k → 12%HARMONY AT HOME: $130k → 12%Harmony at Home: $80k → 12%HARMONY AT HOME: $34k → 12%HARMONY AT HOME: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 5 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+81%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HARMONY AT HOME
    6× · 2017–2024 · $529k · revenue +258%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $401k · revenue +20%
  • CLINICA SIERRA VISTA
    2× · 2017–2020 · $161k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • CY
    Community Youth Ministriesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $74k · revenue +279%
  • BB
    BRIGHTER BEGINNINGSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $44k · revenue +76%
  • LC
    LATINO COMMISSION ON ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue +81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
2
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
3
The Alliance for Community Wellness Dba La Familia Counseling Services

La Familia Counseling Service is an inclusive Latino community-based, multi-cultural organization committed to strengthening the emotional wellness of individuals and the preservation of families.

4
Chico Feminist Womens Health Center dba Womens Health Specialists

Womens Health Specialists vision is a world where women control their own bodies,reproduction, and sexuality. The center is dedicated to providing women-controlledhealth care for all women.

Health
5
Latino Leadership Council Inc

To advance the wellness and leadership capacity of Latino populations.

Health
6
Center for Human Development

Center for human development is a california non-profit corporation dedicated to creating opportunities for people to realize their full potential. chd operates a spectrum of services for at-risk youth, individuals, families and…

7
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
8
Community Agency for Resources Advocacy & Services

Resources and Community Advocacy. Serving low income youth and families in the community. Providing culturally competent and sensitivie programing based on based on the needs and resources available in Santa Clara County.

Human Services
9
Health Connected

Health Connected equips young people and trusted adults with knowledge and skills to thoughtfully navigate the intersections of relationships, bodies, and digital well-being.

Education
10
Active Community Health Center of Broward Inc

We are and Agency created on the fundamental value that strengthening one family at a time will transform our community as a whole. we believe that all people should have access to behavioral healt servicesa and to live a fulfilling life.…

11
California Youth Services

We provide education, counseling, and intervention programs to support individuals and families facing substance abuse, behavioral, and mental health challenges. Our mission is to empower youth and fimilies with the skills, resources, and…

Human Services
12
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brighter Beginnings and the most unlike its peers is Community Youth Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $401,141 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INCCLINICA SIERRA VISTA — $160,954 · HealthCLINICA SIERRA VISTABRIGHTER BEGINNINGS — $44,410 · HealthBRIGHTER BEGINNINGSLATINO COMMISSION ON ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE SERVICES — $33,272 · HealthHARMONY AT HOME — $528,991 · Human ServicesHARMONY AT HOMEFresno Barrios Unidos — $456,758 · Crime & LegalFresno Barrios UnidosCommunity Youth Ministries — $74,349 · Youth DevelopmentACT for Women and Girls — $71,666 · Education
Health$639,777Human Services$528,991Crime & Legal$456,758Youth Development$74,349Education$71,666

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARMONY AT HOME — $528,991 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetFresno Barrios Unidos — $456,758 over 2y, 17% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $401,141 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCLINICA SIERRA VISTA — $160,954 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACT for Women and Girls — $71,666 over 2y, 11% of budgetLATINO COMMISSION ON ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE SERVICES — $33,272 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program ManagementCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The California Endowment · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shine Together Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $5k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph