Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sherman Rotary Club Charitable and Scholarship Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$56kYouth Development$54kRecreation & Sports$27kFood & Nutrition$26kEmployment$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kHousing & Shelter$800
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$375k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARK PRIDE (SHERMAN PARKS AND RECREATION)$17,000
AUSTIN COLLEGE$5,500
FRIENDS OF SHERMAN PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$2,000
GRAYSON COLLEGE FDN$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$1,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT TYLER$1,000
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MEALS ON WHEELS: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$94k · 12 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
27

Total granted

$94k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+40%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $15k · revenue +24%
  • GG
    GRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $12k · revenue +205%
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +19%
  • SP
    SHERMAN PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
2
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
5
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
6
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
7
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
8
Biola University Inc

Biola university is a private christian university located in southern california. for over 116 years, biola has stood out as an institution grounded on biblically centered education, intentional spiritual development, and career…

Education
9
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
10
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
11
Southwestern University

Southwestern university, under the auspices of the united methodist church, is committed to undergraduate liberal arts education involving both the study of and participation in significant aspects of our cultural heritage, expressed…

Education
12
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin College; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF SHERMAN: $30,000 · OtherCITY OF SHERMANPARK PRIDE (SHERMAN PARKS AND RECREATION): $17,000 · OtherPARK PRIDE (SHERMAN PARKS AND RECREATION)SHERMAN PARKS AND RECREATION: $10,000 · OtherSHERMAN PARKS AND RECREATIONFRIENDS OF SHERMAN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $4,000 · Other+26 more: $33,700 · Other+26 moreAUSTIN COLLEGE: $15,500 · EducationAUSTIN COLLEGEGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDA…BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITYDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY+5 more: $5,000 · Education+5 moreMEALS ON WHEELS: $13,000 · Human ServicesGRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION: $11,500 · Food & NutritionSHERMAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropySHARE MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 · ReligionHOUSE OF ELI INC: $800 · Housing & Shelter
Other$94,700Education$42,500Human Services$13,000Food & Nutrition$11,500Philanthropy$1,000Religion$1,000Housing & Shelter$800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE: $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $13,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetGRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION: $11,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHERMAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOUSE OF ELI INC: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHERMAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Trinity University ↗
  • Who funds SHARE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF ELI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sherman Rotary Club Charitable and Scholarship Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sherman Rotary Club Charitable and Scholarship Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Southern Nazarene University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sherman Rotary Club Charitable and Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph